Industrialisation, Urbanisation and the Environment Flashcards
(41 cards)
industrialisation
•refers to the transition whereby the methods of production change, w accompanying social and cultural change
industrialisation of the west
•br. fist country to industrialise (around 1750-1850) w other countries (france, usa) soon following
•ind. involved ‘total change’ involving all aspects of society - polanyi called it a ‘total transformation
•around 1.5% of uks pop work in agriculture
import substitution industrialisation (isi)
•1950s and 60s - third world countries tried isi (ind. strat to produce goods for their own domestic market, in comp. w imports from developed world) - usually involved state setting up industries and protecting them by putting high tariffs/complete bans on imported goods
•countries that attempted isi on large scale - mexico, india, brazil - india has own car industry, ambassador car for sale rather than export and protected from foreign competition
results of isi
•isi led to some develop. in latin amer, not widely successful - maj. problem was saving from dom. production of goods were balanced by costs of importing the necessary raw materials (hewitt, 2000)
why do neoliberals argue abt isi
•protection of ‘infant industries’ through tariffs on imports leads to inefficiency and lack of innovation and therefore isi couldn’t be successful in long term
export-orientated industrialisation (eoi)
•1970s - shift towards eoi (ind. strat based on production for export), had already been achieved by japan’s - produced goods cheaply and succeeded in marketing them in developed world
•eoi - south k, taiwan, singapore
what did the eoi counties become known as
•became known as ‘newly-industrialising countries’ (nics - those that seemed to make rapid progress in late 20th century) and ‘asian tigers’
•protected their industries in early stages of develop. states provided considerable support to companies
why is it a harder for other countries to industrialise
•success of japan and each subsequent state country seems to make it harder for other countries to succeed bcs the world market is always under the control of developed countries - few opportunities left tot exploit
•influence of neoliberal economics means that countries are under pressure to allow free trade rather than protest their infant industries
an example of eoi working better than isi
•north and south korea divided at end of ww2 - north follows isi, south eoi
•south k today many times wealthier than north and achtes much more highly on measures such as expectancy
agriculture as industry
•strength of most developing countries is agriculture, especially those in tropical zones having good conditions to grow crops to export to the west
•also been the main way of life for many, export of cash crops created during colonial period - great agr. v much like an industry in order to increase production and to meet standards required by western consumers
•production often controlled by tnc’s
green revolution
•started in 1960s - based on new high-yield varieties and enabled production and increased substantially
•scientific and tech. develop. that improved agr. yields, enabled more food to be produced in developing countries
•does require ever greater use of environmentally damaging fertilisers and pesticides
new opportunities for industry
•gl. opened up new opportunities for developing industries, notable global communication technology to process data/develop software for customers in rich countries
•many developing countries have taken up technologies e.g. mobile phone use in africa has grown quickly
technological leapfrogging
•refers to the use of a new technology when the prev. tech has not been used
•often older version of new tech was less efficient and more polluting and the newer version is more sustainable
•e.g. adoption of mobile phones w/o widespread use of land-line telephones
tourism
•international tourism a huge industry often seen as third largest industry in world - non-western destination have grown in popularity e.g. small west african nation of the gambia relies heavily on it
•range of diff strategies for developing ind. that can be adopted
what are the problems with the idea of a country having a development strategy
•can involve adopting the latest fashion whether or not it’s appropriate or likely to work
•usually adopted by an elite and its main purpose may even be to mine their own pockets
•any strategy will have diff outcomes for diff groups but those involved are not usually consulted - ind. needs factory workers who will have persuaded to leave agr. livelihood and move to city
what does moore (1967) argue
•there is no evidence to show that any population anywhere ever wanted ind.
•ind. favoured by members of emerging mc who saw opportunities for enrichment and to take power from rulers of pre-industrial society
•e.g. swing riots in 1830s britain bcs it would end trad. br. livelihood and destroy communities
how did polanyi describe the great transformation
•as a struggle between those who wanted to est. the market as the organising principle of society and those who wanted to protect themselves, land and livelihoods against new market forces
•ind. requires one generation to pay a heavy social and environmental price in order for their descendants to benefit
urbanisation
•the process by which a growing prop. of ppl live in towns and cities and the changes which accompany this process
•2007 - first time more than half worlds pop. living in cities
•urban pop. expected to grow nearly twice the rate of growth of pop. as a whole
•rural pop. expected to remain stable overall w some variations based on region
•occurs as a result of migration/smaller settlements growing until classified as cities
what do mt believe ant urbanisation
•look back to model of western develop. see growth of cities as an essential part of econ. growth - cities provide labour force concentrated in one place for factories and businesses, also imp. in promoting cultural change bcs removes ppl from countryside (trad ways strongest) and expose them to western values
•expect urb. to be essential part to econ. and cultural change leading to develop.
how is urbanisation different for developing countries today
•third world cities tend to be bigger and fewer - often a primate city (larger than any other cities in the country)
•urb. has not been accompanied by ind. - city dwellers often make a living from informal sector work rather than being formally employed
•poor in growing western cities in 19th century formed a proletariat, working in factories and workshops and often organised trade unions - fanon argues said that the v marginality made them potentially rev. - not widely shared for developing world bcs few strong political movements have arisen
what do dt argue
•colonialism has made it impossible for developing countries to follow in the footsteps of the developed world
•urb. in developing countries fundamentally diff bcs it’s not response to ind. - mangy est./her dramatically under colonial rule bcs they were used as administrative centres and as staging posts in exports of raw materials and cash crops - two tiered social system grew colonial and high ranking natives enjoying higher stan. if live.
•argue that characteristics have not changed under neo-colonialism as tnc’s have replaced colonial powers - cities play key role in keeping countries underdeveloped and using resources in unprod. ways
urban housing in developing countries
•no. of ppl in cities far exceeds no. of jobs available leaving many un/underemployed -poor usually have no access to regular housing so build their own and often in illegally occupied land and gov usually see them as problems so residents live under constant threat of homes being demolished
what is urb. housing like in developing countries
•temporary and low quality but over time more permanent feature created w residents acting together to arrange resources and amenities
•often viable solution to ppls problems - providing accommodation they can afford close to sources of income
•spontaneous settlements also offer new arrivals in city a foothold - can encourage self help and collective action
•access to water, sanitation, education, health and other resources limited, residents often unable to vote (no legal address) and vulnerable to exploitation
migration
•often explained using ‘push pull theory’ which focuses on rational decisions to move made by in. (push - disad. of rural life that push ppl to cities. pull - adv. if city life that attract ppl to move there)
•influx of large no. of ppl w/o steady incomes contributes to urban squalor