Trade and Aid Flashcards
(35 cards)
aid
•refers to economic, military, technical and financial assistance given or loaned to developing countries
•produced by voluntary agencies and ngos
•official development assistance (oda) - organisation for economic cooperation and develops. (oecd) comprise 25 developed countries - members have aid budgets - allocate parts of their resources to oda (1970, agreed to aim to allocate 0.7% of gni to oda - most don’t meet target)
•oda takes form of grants and soft loans to promote econ. develop. and welfare to developing countries
•two types - bilateral and multilateral
•covers grants and loans (have to be repaid) and also writing off of debt
bilateral aid
•involves only the donor and the recipient, usually gov to gov
•oda given given directly to a developing country
multilateral aid
•donors contribute to a shared fund form which aid is then given to recipients
tied aid
•often this - the aid must be used for a particular purpose specified by the donor
•donor country may also specify that the money be paid to one of its own companies to carry out a particular project
•bilateral aid is often tied
aid and conditionality
•may be subject to conditionality which is the setting of conditions on aid so that it will be withheld if those conditions aren’t met and will only be given if recipient country abides by certain conditions
•aid may be cancelled if recipient country fails to hold levtiona it reform economy
what is a recent development in aid
•the giving of aid by countries outside of oecd group of rich nations - cuba had a successful healthcare system and has sent doctors and other medical aid to developing countries
what occurred w aid due to the global economic downturn 2008
•oecd govs came under pressure to cut their oda spending, uk tory and lib dem coalition did not cut aid spending even tho public support for aid dropped (glennie et al 2012)
•under law passed 2013, uk gov has to spend at least 0.7% gni each year on aid
•br aid redirected towards greater support for private businesses and towards countries whose security was seen as important in preventing islamic terrorism from spreading
case against aid - neoliberal view
•aid is seen as teaching ppl to be dependant on handouts, taking away their own initiative and their ability to hemp themselves
•counties seen as poor bcs of their own failings and may even encourage them to
•third world counties then demand aid as a right and become trapped in a culture of dependancy
•view that it a project is viable, it should be able to attract investment so that aid in unnecessary
evidence of this view
•bauer (1995) - economist who popularised neolib view - argued that aid could not be necessary for development bcs northern countries did not receive aid when they were developing
•suggested that aid implied that developing woled was incapable of achieving what the west achieved
•says the term aid is misleading - implies smth pos. w a more neutral term being gov to gov subsidy - ‘aid’ allows gov to seem like they’re doing smth right - stated that the reality was that aid went to the govs not the ppl
aid being criticised from a developing perspective
•moyo (2010) argues that aid has been harmful to africa bcs it has created dependancy, fostered corruption and encouraged poor governance and has not led to develop.
•believes that aid should be phased out and replaced by encouragement and entrepreneurship and the market
case against aid - neo-marxist view
•aid is imperialism
•hayter - in book titled aid as imperialism - argues that aid is conditional - one way in which rich countries excercise power over poorer ones so is a form is imperialism
•regards the claim made by western govs that aid helps south as hypocritical - most aid doesn’t alleviate pov. bcs it isnt meant to - real purpose is to strengthen a system which damages the interests of the poor
•most doesn’t go to ppl or countries that need it but to those who are of strategic or other importance to the donor country
•creates jobs, exports market for donors, used to win pol. support - recipient country gets aid if it agrees to support donor
the middle ground - social democratic view
•aid can work but is often inappropriate or inefficient - not an objection to all aid but recognition that much aid it misdirected and abused and a desire to see it used well
the middle ground - social democratic view
•aid can work but is often inappropriate or inefficient - not an objection to all aid but recognition that much aid it misdirected and abused and a desire to see it used well
examples where aid has not contributed to development
•supports corrupt/undemocratic govs or where money is wasted via inefficiency
•aid used to strengthen armed forces (not helping ppl directly)
•projects that are innap. and do more harm than good
•projects that cause damage to the gov
the case for aid
•come main rly from mt - rich world could provide air in the form capital, expertise or tech as a helping hand to those who were behind the road to prosperity and mass consumption
•sachs (2005) argues for a big push of large-scale, focused and intergrated aid to lift developing countries out of pov
even though aid has not solved some issues, what are the positives abt it
•may not have solved world pov but have made things better than they would otherwise have been
•collier (2007) estimates that over past 30 yrs, aid has added 1 percentage point to the annual growth rate of counties of the ‘bottom billion’ - sig. as counties would’ve been poorer w/o aid
•aid may not have led to develop. but has stopped situations from getting worse
how has bauers view of aid been challenged
•challenged on ethical grounds
•argues that developing countries are responsible for own poverty however it is chance that leads to an in. being born in a developing country - not the in. fault for where they are born
•can be argued on the grounds of natural justice that giving aid is a moral imperative - with it is it helps improve life chances
does aid do more harm than good
•depends on type of aid that is offered
•aid that is small-scale, aware of local needs, controlled at a local level, usually given by and ngo can be v pos. however is not going to transform a country on its own
•aid in disaster/emergency can be vital although some has been misdirected and often been restricted to relief rather than est. foundations for a more secure future
the debt crisis - origins
•refers to the inability/refusal of indebted countries to pay interests on loans/to repay the original loan - hold back develop. by diverting money and resources
•has origins in 1970s when banks lent money to third world - mt led ppl to believe that if they were helped, poorer countries would quickly develop and begin to catch up w loans being seen as good business for banks and a contribution toward modernisation
•third world counties took the money believing that econ. growth would mean they could pay interest and eventually repay loan
•some lent money went to dictators, spent on arms and some brief develop.
the debt crisis - beginning
•recession in 1980s caused richer countries to reduced export markets it third world countries - still had to repay interest in their loans
•many countries went deeper and deeper into debt, borrowing even more money to pay off interest due on earlier loans
•when govs obliged to curtail their spendings, easier to cure health and ed. budgets than to reduce spending on arms and military
•debt then became huge obstacle to develop.
debt boomerang
•george (1991) - term to describe the ways in which the debt has a neg. effects in developed world - debt also creating problems for north and action on debt was in interest of north as well as being ethically desirable
•suggests that debt cancellation is actually in interests of those whole money is owed - not chastity or compassion but social and econ. sense
how was the debt burden reduced
•highly indebted poor countries initiative (hipc) - allowed debt to be written off provided the countries adopt imf and world bank approved econ. policies
what is the main argument for not cancelling the debts
•’moral hazard’ - used in insurance industry referring to when ppl are not held responsible for what goes wrong as a result of decisions they have made - cancelling debate rewards those countries that didn’t but use the money well
what is another argument on why not to cancel the debts completely
•banks would probably not loan money to the countries concerned in future
•much if the money is owed to world bank and int - debt cancellation would leave them w limited funds to promote develop.