Kohlberg 1968- The child as moral philosopher Flashcards
(23 cards)
Main features of the sample?
- 75 american boys
- At start: between 10-16
- At end: 22-28
- 12 year study
- Additional sample from great britian, canada, taiwan, mexico and turkey
Number of participants
75
age of participants at the start
10-16
age of participants at the end
22-28
Where was the additional sample from?
Great Britain, Mexico, Canada, Turkey, Taiwan
How long was the study?
12 years
Why were only boys used in the study and not girls?
- Easier to study due to females menstrual cycles which cause hormonal imbalances at different parts of their cycle
- could affect their morals
- removes any gender differences which may arise
Evaluate the sample
- little knowledge of the stages of moral development before the age of 10
- unable to generalize to females
- females morality may differ from males morality
- reduce gender differences
- main findings based on american boys
- little known about the participants from other countries and their findings
Why did he interview additional samples from other countries?
In order to gain cross-cultural comparison
What methodology was used?
Case study
features of the methodology used
- longitudinal study (12 years)
- in depth investigation
- descriptive analysis
Describe the methodology
- longitudinal study followed same boys for 12 years
- use of interviews to assess moral reasoning
Evaluate the use of interviews
- ability to ask follow up questions if needed
- as it includes children, they may be unable to complete other methods such as questionnaires
- more susceptible to researcher bias- body language etc.
evaluate the use of hypothetical moral dilemmas
- examines what they say they would do not actually what they would do
- not relevant to participant
- different dilemmas for different participants
- Different questions with children of different ages
4 issues with validity
- researcher bias
- use of hypothetical moral dilemmas
- investigator bias
- population validity
investigator bias
- when interpreting responses in interviews
researcher bias
- use of interviews
- social desirability bias
- kolhberg’s own cultural views impacting his perception of the participants responses
How was kohlbergs study unethical
worked with vulnerable individuals
How were the participants vulnerable
under 16
Possible ethical issues considering they were under 16
- valid consent
- risk of stress, humiliation, anxiety and pain
- confidentiality
- use of ethical guidelines
What were the stages of moral development which he identified?
1- pre- convectional
2- convectional
3- post-convectional
How regularly were they interviewed?
Every 3 years
androcentric
focused on men- more important than women