learning approach Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

what is the behaviourist approach

A

The behaviourist approach is an approach to explaining behaviour which suggests that
all behaviour is acquired and maintained through classical and operant conditioning. (born as tabula rasa -blank space)
Hence, only behaviour which can be objectively measured and observed is studied.
-Rejects introspection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

key theorists of the behavioural approach

A

The key theorists of the behaviorist approach include Pavlov,Skinner, and Watson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what do behaviourists believe when it comes to research

A

the basic laws of learning are the same across both non-humans and humans. so, non-human animals can replace humans in behaviourist experimental research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is classical conditioning

A

When a neutral stimulus is consistently paired with an unconditioned stimulus so that it eventually takes on the propertes of this stimulus and is able to produce a conditioned response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3 stages of classical conditioning

A

Before conditioning
During conditioning
After conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happens before conditioning

A

An UCS (like food) creates a reflex action like salivation. This action is called an unconditioned response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what happens during conditioning

A

UCS and NS are experienced close in time, this is called pairing. This effect is greatest when NS occurs just before UCS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what happens after conditioning

A

NS produces same response as UCS.

NS is now called Conditioned stimulus and the response called Conditioned response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what happens in extinction n how can it be a benefit

A

When the CS isn’t paired with the UCS for a while so the CS no longer produces the CR.

has survival value as ‘extinction’ may happen to make us forget a certain fear we have

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what’s spontaneous recovery

A

An extinct response that appears randomly without an explanation causing the CS to create a CR.demonstrates that extinction doesn’t mean a learned response is completely unlearned, but rather that it’s suppressed,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what’s stimulus generalisation

A

when slight changes in the conditioned stimulus, such as different pitches of the bell used in Pavlov’s experiment, still produces the same conditioned response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define Unconditioned stimulus (UCS)
Define Unconditioned Response (UCR)
Define Neutral stimulus (NS)
Define Conditioned Stimulus (CS)
Define COnditioned Response (CR)

A

Define Unconditioned stimulus -A stimulus that produces a response without any learning taking place
Define Unconditioned Response -An unlearned response to an unconditioned stimulus
Define Neutral stimulus -Does not produce target repsonse. It becomes conditioned stimulus after being paired with unconditioned stimulus.
Define Conditioned Stimulus -stimulus that produces target reponse after being paired with UCS
Define Conditioned Response -Response elicited by CS, i.e a new association has been learned so that the NS produces a CR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what’s an example of classical conditioning

A

pavlov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what’s pavlovs study

A

aim:To find out if a reflexive behaviour can be produced in new situations through learning.
iv:dogs natural reflex dv:no of drops of saliva the dogs produced
1.Before conditioning, the unconditioned stimulus (food) produced an unconditioned response (salivation).
2. During conditioning, the unconditioned stimulus was repeatedly paired with a neutral stimulus (a bell), to produce the same unconditioned response of salivation.
3. An association was made between the unconditioned stimulus and the neutral stimulus.
4. After conditioning, the neutral stimulus became the conditioned stimulus, producing the conditioned response of salivation.
5.Extinction was found when the CS, the bell, was presenetd without the UCS. The dog lost this response of salivating to the bell.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did pavlov conclude

A

Link is likely to be made in the brain between a UCS and a NS that occurs just before the UCS. This was called signalisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

classical conditioning strengths

A

real life application=Our understanding of CC has also led to the development of therapies which eliminate or reduce phobias through SD.

high internal validity=Pavlov implemented good controls to reduce the amount of extraneous variables that would affect the dogs.The dogs placed in a soundproof room so there’s no noise to distract the.tjis meant salivation was actually caused by the conditioned stimulus was actually due to the conditioning and not extraneous variables.

17
Q

classical conditioning weaknesses/behaviourist approach

A

It raises ethical issues as it might not take free will into account of dogs and ethical guidelines being breached where The dogs were subjected to procedures that may have caused them stress, such as being restrained and exposed to repetitive stimuli.

Limitations of classical conditioning explanations- relationships between the CS and UCS tend to be more difficult to establish for some species than for others. Seligman(1970) suggested that animals are prepared to learn associations that are significant for survival rather than those that are not significant to survival.

As the study was conducted on dogs it cannot be generalised to humans.
human have a very differently structure brain to dogs and other animalsHumans have larger cerebral cortex than dogs which allows for more complex emotions like conscious choice.butttt. Watson and Rayner’s lil albert study proves that its possible for CC to work on humans.

18
Q

what’s operant conditioning

A

A type of learning where behaviour is acquired and maintained based on its consequences. Reinforcement increases the likelihood of the observed behaviour being repeated, whilst punishment (an unpleasant consequence of behaviour) decreases this likelihood.

19
Q

what’s positive and negative reinforcement

A

Positive reinforcement occurs when we carry out a behaviour to receive a reward e.g. completing homework to receive praise from a teacher.
negative reinforcement occurs when we carry out behaviour to avoid negative consequences e.g. completing homework to avoid being given a detention

20
Q

how to test operant conditioning and mechanisms of reinforcement

A

in skinners box study-He found that when a rat placed in a special cage accidentally pressed a lever and was rewarded for this behaviour with food, it would press the lever consciously + learnt to repeat this action to inc their reward of food. cuz this behaviour became positively reinforced through gaining the reward. When the food pellet ceased to be given by the lever the rat would eventually stop pressing it as extinction of the behaviour occurred.Skinner experimented with this by providing unpleasant loud noises which the rat could switch off through the press of a lever. He found negative reinforcement also reinforced behaviour this way as rats would repeatedly press the lever to avoid unpleasant noises. He also found that when the lever led to punishments such as electric shocks being administered, they were less inclined to press it highlighting how punishment can stop a behaviour from occurring altogether. Aversive behaviours in humans are proposed to be negatively reinforced as we try to avoid unpleasant outcomes by engaging in particular behaviours while punishments cause some of our behaviours to cease completely.

21
Q

what’s another way behaviour can be learned other than reinforcement

A

punishment-A way of stopping behaviour

Can be positive: adding unpleasant stimulas A way of stopping behaviour

Can be positive: adding unpleasant stimulas
like a slap
Negative: taking a way something desirable being grounded

22
Q

strengths n weaknesses of operant conditioning n skinner

A

strength was it relied on the experimental method which allowed the use of controlled conditions through the skinner box. allowed causal relationships between 2 variables to be established as he could see how manipulation of the consequences of behaviour (IV) affected behaviour itself (DV). This also allowed accurate predictions on behaviour to be made too.
disadv= it has relied heavily on animals such as rats and pigeons. They are significantly different from humans and therefore the findings may lack external validity to real world situations for humans. This is because humans have free will and behaviour is not so easily determined by positive or negative reinforcement.

As it suggests that we do not have control over our own behaviour as we act merely on reinforcement which is deterministic. This raises ethical and legal issues especially if someone can argue they are not responsible for their own actions when committing crimes for example as they have no free will of their own which behavioural explanations discount completely.

a major weakness is it is difficult to generalise the findings to humans. This is because experiments such as skinner’s box are contrived and have no mundane realism when applied to daily scenarios humans face meaning we may not be able to draw the same conclusions outside the artificial setting of a laboratory.

23
Q

strengths n weaknesses of behaviourist approach

A

+ behaviourist approach makes use of highly scientific research methods.Strictly-controlled conditions reduce and control for confounding effects and EV’s, inc the reliability and internal validity of findings (as these are more likely to be replicated when research is conducted under the same conditions). By focusing on behaviour which is observable and can be measured, the behaviourist approach increases the scientific credibility of psychology.
+ Real-Life Applications = An inc understanding of classical + operant conditioning led to the development of treatments and therapies for serious mental disorders. so, behaviourist principles have had positive impacts on the lives of many.

+ it assumes all behaviour is learnt n can simply be unlearnt. This has led to real world applications through the training of sleep behaviour in babies to even dogs and obedience training.

  • Environmental determinism in the behaviorist approach argues all behaviours shaped by past reinforcement, so no room for free will. While this works for animal behavior, it doesn’t fully explain human behavior, which involves emotions, + and reasoning. Social learning theory accounts for these factors, making the behaviorist approach a limited explanation for human behavior.
  • behaviourist research by modern standards, seen as unethical. Skinner’s box caused physical harm to rats, breaching the BPS ethical guideline of protection from harm. in pavlovs,The dogs were subjected to procedures that may have caused stress, such as being restrained and exposed to repetitive stimuli.Watson and Rayner’s classical conditioning experiments on Little Albert failed to protect him from psychological harm, n not offering him the opportunity to withdraw. However, a cost-benefit analysis may show that the benefit of increased understanding of the different types of learning (classical and operant conditioning) outweigh the ethical costs.
24
Q

what is the social learning theory

A

Bandura’s social learning theory suggests learning occurs through classical and operant conditioning, and indirectly, through vicarious reinforcement. through the observation of other peoples actions (models) and the consequences they face, be they positive or negative.

25
what does the social learning theory suggest how learning works
An observer identifies themselves with a desirable role model. This role model displays or models a specific behaviour, which is imitated by the observer. The likelihood that the observed behaviour will be imitated is increased if the role model is seen to be ‘vicariously reinforced’ or rewarded. Therefore, the consequences of the observed behaviour are more important than observing the behaviour alone.
26
what does the model have to be
can be live models which carry out an attitude or behaviour the observer identifies with. this may be some1 in daily life or a symbolic model which may be someone from the media. usually model is attractive, high social status, of a similar age and same gender . They give eg of attitudes or behaviours which are observed and reproduced through a process known as imitation. Imitation of behaviour and attitudes is learnt much more quickly through models than conditioning.
27
3 key factors that determine whether a behaviour will be imitated.
1.The characteristics of model 2.The confidence observer has in own ability to copy models behaviour 3.The observed consequences of the behaviour in question
28
what is identification
The process by which an observer relates to/ associates themselves with a role model n aspires to become more like role model.key determinant of imitation
29
what's vicarious reinforcement
indirect learning occurring when observer sees their role model being rewarded for displaying a certain behaviour. The observer is then motivated to imitate this behaviour, to try receive the same reward.
30
what are the 4 meditational processes bandora documented and why are they significant.
Attention, Retention, Reproduction and Motivation. Behaviour must first grab attention of the individual, retention involves behaviour being remembered or mental representations of the behaviours used while reproduction involves the observer believing they have the ability to reproduce the behaviour themselves there must be motivation for observer to use the behaviour in a given situation where they see the rewards of its use outweighing the potential costs.. 1+2 = observation of behaviour and 3+4=actual imitation of behaviour .gap shows behaviours not instantly imitated n requires cognitive processes before.
31
supporting evidence of social learning theory
Bandura’s Bobo Doll Study - 36 boys and 36 girls were tested aged 3-6. There were three experimental groups, with the first being exposed to real-life aggressive models, a second group observing the same models displaying aggressive acts on film and a third group viewing an aggressive cartoon character. The researchers found that the children who’d observed an aggressive role model behaved more aggressively themselves towards the Bobo Children in non-aggressive group exhibited virtually no aggression towards the doll. This supports social learning theory and demonstrates how children may acquire aggressive acts by modeled behaviour by others. him n Walters then did another study to see why a child acts aggressively in absence of model.they showed three sets of kids diff endings to a movie 1- had rewards for aggression 2-had punishment for aggression 3 had no consq.group 1 showed more aggression,group 2 shoed a low level of agression in play group 3 were inbetween. supports SLT + idea of vicarious learning and reinforcement influencing learning and imitation of behaviour.
32
strengths of social learning theory
Acknowledges role of human cognition = cognitive processes may be considered as more complex than that of animals. SLT has the advantage over behaviorism because it acknowledges the role of mental processes, like the awareness and understanding people have of their own actions Therefore, SLT may be a better n more holistic explanation of human behaviour, compared to behaviourism. Banduras studyyyy and its strengths identification important for imitation is supported by fox et al which used virtual humans who looked alike to ppts and those who didn't look alike.those who observed models that looked alike2 themselves and engaged in exercise, after 24 hrs, researchers found these ppts more likely to engage in exercise behaviour themselves compared to participants who observed virtual models loitering that were diff to them. gives support for identification with the models being important for retention and imitation of behaviour
33
weaknesses of social learning theory
The problem with determining causality is figuring out if being exposed to certain behavior leads to imitation. The theory suggests that spending more time with deviant peers increases the chance of adopting their values. However, it's hard to prove cause and effect because the person might have already had similar attitudes before being exposed, which could explain why they were drawn to those peer groups.. so confounding variables like individual differences and personality are factors affecting results. Social learning theory explains behavior through external influences like peers, parents, and media. However, it doesn't fully consider genetic factors or personal traits like a person's internal locus of control. This makes it hard to say if behavior is caused by social learning alone or by a mix of external and internal factors. Social learning can't explain all behavior, especially when there's no clear role model, This is more evident when imitation revolves around psychopathic behaviours or abnormal behaviours which are limited to just one individual w no role model to learn from. so SLT as an explanation for all behaviours is not appropriate and biological explanations may be better suited in some cases involving mental disorders.
34
strengths n weaknesses of bandoras research
may lack internal validity, due to not entirely investigating the effect of aggressive role models because the Bobo doll is specifically designed to be hit. The study may also lack mundane realism because it may not represent how children would be aggressive in day-to-day situations, perhaps towards objects or people that are not meant to be struck. Therefore, participants may have deliberately acted more aggressively towards the doll in order to please the experimenter (the ‘Please-U effect’). This reduces the generalisability of the findings.Bandura’s Bobo Doll experiment ignores the biological differences between boys and girls = Social learning theory suggests that we learn from experience, and so ignores other biological or psychological factors, thus adopting environmental determinism. Bandura ignored boys, in relation to girls, exhibited significantly more aggression. This may be explained due to boys having higher levels of testosterone, Therefore, this suggests that SLT may not be a complete explanation for gender differences in behaviour, due to not accounting for the biological and hormonal differences between the sexes. it was a lab experiment so it has a high level of controls ensuring Eve's can be controlled. high validity due to standardised procedure eg all kids saw model for same amount of time ensuring only diff in results is diff in models