Lecture 4 Flashcards

1
Q

they observe the outcomes without intervening to affect them

A

observational studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the reseacher manipilates the exposure (usually drug) to compare it to the standard of care

A

experimental studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what kind of studies are ;
Cohort studies
case control studies
cross-sectional studies

A

observational studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

subjects are selected based on their exposure status

A

cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

__studies follow participants in time:

A

cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

compares disease prevalence in the exposed and unexposed

A

prospective cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

they begin with the exposure of interest and probe back for exposure information

A

retrospective cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

maintains temporal sequence (assesses exposure before outcome)

good for assessing rare exposures and rapidly fatal diseases

can study multiple diseases/outcomes from a given exposure

A

advantages of cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

can calculate incidence among exposed and unexposed

A

cohort advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

provides complete description of experience after exposure, including rate of progression and natural history of disease

A

cohort advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

expensive
inefficient for rare diseases
long followup

A

disadvantage of cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cohort study selection of exposed - source depends on

A

research question

ability to collect exposure or diseased info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

subjects are selected based on their diseased status

A

case-control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

theoretically should mimic cohort studies , diseased people are compared to non-diseased people

A

case-control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

in a case-control study, cases and controls should be different only on

A

their past exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

can demonstrate risk indicators and not risk factors due to the retrospective nature of the study design (temporality cannot be assessed)

A

case-control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the exposure has to be assessed retrospectively and the proportions of cases and controls who are exposed are unknown at the beginning of the study

A

case-control study

18
Q

cases and controls must have an equal

A

chance of being exposed

19
Q

efficient for rare diseases
relatively efficient in terms of time and money
can study diseases with long latency period
allow for the evaluation of multiple exposures that may increase risk for a specific disease

A

advantages of case-control studies

20
Q

not optimal for rare exposures, cannot directly compute incidence of disease in exposed and non-exposed persons
temporal relationship cannot be established with certainty
prone to errors in selection of cases/controls and in errors pertaining to the collection of information

A

disadvantages case-control studies

21
Q
case-control study: selection of \_\_; 
case (disease definition
diagnostic criteria
hospital based or population based
incident or prevalent cases
A

selection of cases

22
Q

case-control: selection of __;
would be cases if had the disease (similar to cases)
potential for bias and confounding

A

selection of controls

23
Q

selection of subjects based on neither exposure or disease status

A

cross-sectional studies

24
Q

most basic study design
“point-in-time” or snapshots information
subject selected without regards to exposure or disease status
does not need explained etiologic objectives

A

cross-sectional studies

25
Q

sampling and analytic methods provide for statistically valid inference to populations
exposure and disease are assessed at the individual level

A

advantages of cross-sectional studies

26
Q

temporality cannot be assessed

A

disadvantage of cross-sectional studies

27
Q

randomized clinical trial

community intervention trials

A

experimental studies

28
Q

principles of all experimental studies follow those from clinical trials
have a long history in clinical medicine
are sub-types of cohort studies in which exposure is randomly assigned by the investigator

A

randomized clinical trial

29
Q

the process by which each participant’s treatment is determined by some random mechanism

A

randomization feature of RCT

30
Q

the primary purpose of ___ is the minimizing of confounding

A

randomization

31
Q

why randomize in RCT

A

to create groups that are not determined by any other factor than by chance

32
Q

feature of RCT; the investigator and/or the participant do not know what arm the participant is in

A

blinding

33
Q

the participant does not know but investigator does know treatment assignment

A

single blinded

34
Q

neither the participant nor investigator know treatment assignment

A

double blindee

35
Q

what is the purpose of blinding

A

to remove bias or systematic error

36
Q

drawing different conclusions depending on their knowledge of which study arm particular participant is in

A

information bias

37
Q

study recruiters can be eager to recruit “sick persons” into experimental arm

A

selection bias

38
Q
key elements of\_\_\_;
selection of study population
allocation of treatment/intervention
study conduct and compliance 
follow-up and establishing outcomes
A

RCT

39
Q

considerations in experimental studies (3)

A

stopping rules, sample size, analysis and interpretation

40
Q

systematic complete summary of the literature

A

systematic review

41
Q

combined analysis of data from different studies following strict guidelines

A

meta-analysis