Lecture 4 Flashcards

1
Q

they observe the outcomes without intervening to affect them

A

observational studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the reseacher manipilates the exposure (usually drug) to compare it to the standard of care

A

experimental studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what kind of studies are ;
Cohort studies
case control studies
cross-sectional studies

A

observational studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

subjects are selected based on their exposure status

A

cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

__studies follow participants in time:

A

cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

compares disease prevalence in the exposed and unexposed

A

prospective cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

they begin with the exposure of interest and probe back for exposure information

A

retrospective cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

maintains temporal sequence (assesses exposure before outcome)

good for assessing rare exposures and rapidly fatal diseases

can study multiple diseases/outcomes from a given exposure

A

advantages of cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

can calculate incidence among exposed and unexposed

A

cohort advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

provides complete description of experience after exposure, including rate of progression and natural history of disease

A

cohort advantage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

expensive
inefficient for rare diseases
long followup

A

disadvantage of cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cohort study selection of exposed - source depends on

A

research question

ability to collect exposure or diseased info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

subjects are selected based on their diseased status

A

case-control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

theoretically should mimic cohort studies , diseased people are compared to non-diseased people

A

case-control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

in a case-control study, cases and controls should be different only on

A

their past exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

can demonstrate risk indicators and not risk factors due to the retrospective nature of the study design (temporality cannot be assessed)

A

case-control study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the exposure has to be assessed retrospectively and the proportions of cases and controls who are exposed are unknown at the beginning of the study

A

case-control study

18
Q

cases and controls must have an equal

A

chance of being exposed

19
Q

efficient for rare diseases
relatively efficient in terms of time and money
can study diseases with long latency period
allow for the evaluation of multiple exposures that may increase risk for a specific disease

A

advantages of case-control studies

20
Q

not optimal for rare exposures, cannot directly compute incidence of disease in exposed and non-exposed persons
temporal relationship cannot be established with certainty
prone to errors in selection of cases/controls and in errors pertaining to the collection of information

A

disadvantages case-control studies

21
Q
case-control study: selection of \_\_; 
case (disease definition
diagnostic criteria
hospital based or population based
incident or prevalent cases
A

selection of cases

22
Q

case-control: selection of __;
would be cases if had the disease (similar to cases)
potential for bias and confounding

A

selection of controls

23
Q

selection of subjects based on neither exposure or disease status

A

cross-sectional studies

24
Q

most basic study design
“point-in-time” or snapshots information
subject selected without regards to exposure or disease status
does not need explained etiologic objectives

A

cross-sectional studies

25
sampling and analytic methods provide for statistically valid inference to populations exposure and disease are assessed at the individual level
advantages of cross-sectional studies
26
temporality cannot be assessed
disadvantage of cross-sectional studies
27
randomized clinical trial | community intervention trials
experimental studies
28
principles of all experimental studies follow those from clinical trials have a long history in clinical medicine are sub-types of cohort studies in which exposure is randomly assigned by the investigator
randomized clinical trial
29
the process by which each participant's treatment is determined by some random mechanism
randomization feature of RCT
30
the primary purpose of ___ is the minimizing of confounding
randomization
31
why randomize in RCT
to create groups that are not determined by any other factor than by chance
32
feature of RCT; the investigator and/or the participant do not know what arm the participant is in
blinding
33
the participant does not know but investigator does know treatment assignment
single blinded
34
neither the participant nor investigator know treatment assignment
double blindee
35
what is the purpose of blinding
to remove bias or systematic error
36
drawing different conclusions depending on their knowledge of which study arm particular participant is in
information bias
37
study recruiters can be eager to recruit "sick persons" into experimental arm
selection bias
38
``` key elements of___; selection of study population allocation of treatment/intervention study conduct and compliance follow-up and establishing outcomes ```
RCT
39
considerations in experimental studies (3)
stopping rules, sample size, analysis and interpretation
40
systematic complete summary of the literature
systematic review
41
combined analysis of data from different studies following strict guidelines
meta-analysis