Lecture 5 Flashcards
(32 cards)
Purpose of analytic studies
To test hypotheses regarding, for example,
causes of disease;
methods for prevention of disease; the effects of treatments such as vaccines
experimental =
researcher actively intervenes
observational =
testing a predefined claim, no researcher intervention
replication
Responses vary among people. Replication allows us to separate out
true effects from chance effects.
do what you are doing to multiple people, increasing the number of samples
control
Provides context for evaluating the effect of interest.
need to be able to compare without doing it
What would have happened without the intervention or exposure of interest?
trying to compare the thing we are interested in with people who have no been exposed to the thing as you are unable to do it to the same group
placebo group is a type of control group
how easy/hard is causality to prove?
causality is very difficult to prove, especially impossible with a single study
Designing a study to evaluate the effectiveness of something?
make sure the exposure group and control group are similar and control for all other sources
Experimental studies
The researcher manipulates the conditions (intervenes in a natural process) and records the results.
The aim is to control all other factors to isolate the effects of the intervention.
Best way to study causation.
Randomisation can be used to ensure that effects of unmeasured factors are equalised across the intervention and control groups.
Experimental studies are common throughout science
Randomisation
Randomisation can be used to ensure that effects of unmeasured factors are equalised across the intervention and control groups.
ensure we are randomly allocating individuals to treatment and control group to ensure both groups are similar/comparable in number of each group in the treatment and the control group
What is the best way to study causation?
Doing a experimental study ]
Types of analytic study
Experimental
Observational
Observational studies
The investigator does not intervene, simply observes a naturally occurring process, and collects information.
The idea is to get as close as possible to the information that would have been obtained if the experimental study could have been done.
Still aiming to test a particular claim, get as close to an experimental without doing one. Cannot always complete an experimental study because of money, ethics, time etc.
Gold standard analytic study in research =
randomised control trials
what do you compare in an RCT?
compare the 2 rates of a variable in the two different groups
cohort study selection
participants are identified from population, questioned about variable, participants are effectively self selecting therefore the potential for confounding is a real danger (randomisation usually minimises this)
case control study selection
analytic
start with disease and look back in time/start with disease of interest then figure out the treatment background, recall bias as people may not remember
studies that are prospective
cohort study
randomised control trial
prone to loss to follow up
studies that are retrospective
case control study
experimental analytic studies ….
RCT
observational analytic studies …
cohort
case control
Randomised control trial
There are two important characteristics of a RCT:
1 Randomisation - or random allocation, is used to create two comparable groups, one who will have the placebo treatment and the other the experimental treatment. At the end of follow-up any difference between the groups can be attributed to the difference in treatment.
2 Control group - is used to isolate the effects of the intervention.
Blinding refers to not knowing whether the participant is in the intervention or the control group. Several people may be blinded to the allocation including the participants, the people caring for patients, the people measuring outcomes, the lead researcher.
researcher controls treatment and control group and assigns participants to them using randomisation
blinding
Blinding refers to not knowing whether the participant is in the intervention or the control group. Several people may be blinded to the allocation including the participants, the people caring for patients, the people measuring outcomes, the lead researcher.
single blinding =
only participants do not know, researchers know
double blinding =
researcher also doesn’t know as well as participant