lecture 6 Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

Analytic studies generally test

A

hypotheses regarding causal effects.
Did exposure cause disease?
Did the treatment cause an improvement?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aim in a research study is to

A

Our aim in a research study is to obtain a reliable estimate of the impact of the intervention or exposure on the outcome of interest.

isolate the exposure/intervention to obtain a reliable estimate `

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do you need in a hypothesis to make it specific enough?

A

Defined population
a quantity of the variable
a time frame

this gives us enough information for us to test it in a controlled environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Relative risk

A

ratio of the probability of an outcome in an exposed group to the probability of an outcome in an unexposed group.

measures the association between the exposure and the outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

RR = 1 means

A

no relationship - not protective/beneficial/harmful effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

null value of RR is

A

1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sources of error in analytic studies - For the estimate of RR from the study sample

A

Study design and conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Sources of error in analytic studies - for the true RR in the population

A

Inference ….

  • confounding
  • bias
  • chance (random variation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Confounding

A

Confounding is a distortion of the association between exposure and outcome caused by the presence of a third factor (one or more additional factors that is not measured).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Confounder

A

a variable which causes confounding/this distortion

also known as a lurking variable - can give illusion of an effect of something when there is not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

To be a confounder, a variable must be both

A

associated with the exposure (independent of outcome); and

associated with the outcome (independent of exposure);

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does a good study do?

A

Isolate effect, control everything else so that the thing that is being measured can just be associated with the treatment/exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happens to the causal pathway off there is a confounder present?

A

causal pathway (which shows the association) disappears if effect is caused by the confounder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When might we get confounding in an intervention study?

A

Poor selection of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bias types in an analytic study

A

selection bias and information bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Systematic error in analytic studies =

A

bias specifically selection bias and information bias

17
Q

Selection bias

A

poor selection of participants

Systematic error arising from the way participants are selected for inclusion in the study.

In an analytic study, selection bias occurs if the selection processes cause a systematic difference between the groups of participants selected for the study.

Prospective analytic studies rarely obtain participants through random sampling from a population. The issue of representativeness must be considered, but for analytic studies we consider it a generalisability issue rather than bias - ensure that when you draw your conclusion you look at your hypothesis to see how much you can hypothesise

18
Q

Why are cohort studies more susceptible to confounders?

A

due to selection bias

19
Q

Information bias

A

Systematic error arising from the way study information is obtained, interpreted and recorded.

In an analytic study, information bias is a particular problem if there are systematic differences in the information obtained from groups under comparison in the study.

Information bias may be introduced by the:
Observer
Study individual (respondent)
Instruments used to collect the data (e.g. badly-designed questionnaire) Missing measurements (e.g. from loss to follow-up in a prospective study)
20
Q

Non response and its relationship to information and selection bias

A

non-response to a measurement is generally considered information bias, whereas non-response to participation in the study can be considered a selection bias.

21
Q

Example of information bias

A

Interviewers different and have different levels of interviewing (some hard card, some only ask once and move on etc) therefore combat by randomising which interviewer gets assigned to each participant so the enthusiastic interviewer is interviewing roughly the same amount of participants in each group

22
Q

Example of selection bias

A

selection method is biased for some reason, something causes a systematic difference in who is assigned to each group

23
Q

Classification by purpose of study

A

Descriptive (describe things) vs. analytic (testing hypotheses).

24
Q

Classification by form of the design

A

Experimental (researcher intervenes) vs. observational (researcher observes).

25
3 most common analytic studies
RCT, cohort and case-control These classifications provide a useful framework for thinking about the strengths and weaknesses of different study designs, but they will not always work.
26
Randomised control trial
Analytic, experimental, prospective.
27
Cohort study
Analytic, observational, usually prospective.
28
Case-control study
Analytic, observational, retrospective.