Lecture 5 Flashcards

1
Q

environmental appraisals general defintion

A

personal impressions of place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

environmental appraisal 6 personal impressions

A
  1. descriptions
  2. evaluations
  3. judgments of beauty
  4. emotional reactions
  5. meanings
  6. risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

when we make evaluations and preferences about environments, we are asking what?

A

is it good? is it better?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

personal influences on evaluations and preferences are …

A

dependent on persons background (age, gender, culture)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

wilder landscapes preferred more by ___ __ & ____ prefer more rich vegetated/warmer scenes

A

young adults
women

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

are familiar landscapes more preferred?

A

NOT ALWAYS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

physical influences on evaluations and preferences - conclusions

A

rooms with windows more appealing

square over rectangle

higher than usual ceilings preferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

physical influences on evaluations and preferences - Berlynes collative properties - congruity and contrast

A

individual difference among observes more impactful in preference in scenes LOW TO MEDIUM in both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

physical influences on evaluations and preferences - Berlynes collative properties - complexity, coherence, novelty

A

most preferred is MODERATE COMPLEXITY

DEVELOPMENT

CONTRAST

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

physical influences on evaluations and preferences - Jack Nasar’s 3 relevant qualities

A
  1. formal qualities - complexity and order
  2. symbolic quality - style
  3. schemas - mental codification of experience - typicality = usual or unusual?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

pleasant building will show 3 things

A

orderliness

moderate complexity

familiar styles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

exciting building will show 3 things

A

low orderliness

complex

atypical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

physical influences on evaluations and preferences - prospect refuge theory

A

people prefer edges between open and closed areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

fractals

A

imperfect elements repeated in similar shapes but different sizes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Perceiver-Environment approach - Stephen and Rachel Kaplan

A

preference for settings from evolutionary past & in adaptive value offered

prefer sites allowing us to accomplish central human goals

base preference on whats important to us and consequences of choices (cognitive affordances)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Perceiver-Environment approach - Stephen and Rachel Kaplan - coherence

A

making sense immediately

ease with which scene cognitively organized

17
Q

Perceiver-Environment approach - Stephen and Rachel Kaplan - complexity

A

being involved immediately

capacity to keep indiv busy

18
Q

Perceiver-Environment approach - Stephen and Rachel Kaplan - legibility

A

promise of making sense in future

environment could be explored without getting lost

19
Q

Perceiver-Environment approach - Stephen and Rachel Kaplan - mystery

A

promise of future involvement

one could learn more, interact more, be further occupied in space if entered

20
Q

Perceiver-Environment approach - Stephen and Rachel Kaplan preference framework (conclusions)

A

preferred = more mystery

more complexity

more coherence

21
Q

the four main ___ ____ may not be entirely independent of each other

A

cognitive affordances

22
Q

aesthetic appraisals varies with….

A

culture

evolutionary

individual experience

beauty is in the eye of the beholder

23
Q

appraisals of ____, ____, and ____ feelings overlap

A

quality
beauty
pleasant

24
Q

Russell and Mehrabian Emotional response to settings: general

A

emotions, pleasure, arousal independent from on another

environmental & personality variables influence level of emotion experienced

resulting emotions influence desire to approach or avoid setting

25
Russell and Mehrabian Emotional response to settings - pleasure arousal hypothesis
indivs approach physical settings that are MODERATELY arousing, MAXIMALLY pleasurable
26
meanings - 4 processes
1. place attachment 2. ideological communication 3. personal communication 4. architectural purpose
27
place attachment defintion
richness of meaning that develops with great familiarity one's personal identity become inextricably bound with place
28
ideological communication
buildings reflect ideals and aspirations of those who construct them
29
code
certain stylistic elements signify/imply certain philosophies/values
30
personal communication
style and materials of buildings we live/work in "say" something about us
31
architectural purpose
the way function and form understood by everyday observers place meaning linked to planned activities
32
risk appraisal person based influences (6)
1. ethnic background 2. gender, educational level 3. perceived control 4. dispositional anxiety 5. distance from 6. degree of environ activism concern
33
risk appraisal: experts must cease dismissing laypersons appraisals as ____ and begin understanding what is behind their ___
irrational fears
34
___ helps to discern whether or not scene has prospect and refuge qualities
LIGHT
35
environmental assessments: appraisals v assessments
appraisal = person centered - emotion, meaning, concern, preference assessment = place centered - properties of setting, quality
36
environmental assessments: 4 paradigms
expert - eval by trainer observers psychophysical - power to predict judgments of environs lies in scene rather than observer cognitive - human processing of info from environ humanistic/experiential - assessment by active, sensitive observer (phenomenological approach)