Lecture 5: Counterterrorism and Military Technology Flashcards

1
Q

Has there been a recent rise in terrorism?

A

Depends on how you define terrorism: the recent increase in terrorism corresponds with civil wars

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which areas of the world see most terrorism?

A

The Middle East, Africa, and Asia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is terrorism as dangerous as it sounds?

A

Terrorism is very low on global causes of death; in fact, bathtubs are more dangerous to individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can the ANC in South Africa be viewed as both terrorists and freedom fighters?

A

Depends on who characterizes it as terrorism; they were terrorists to the apartheid government, but freedom fighters to supporters of South African liberation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the conceptual critique of terrorism by Tilly? 3 points

A
  1. The terms terror, terrorist, and terrorism are highly contested and used differently by different actors to serve their own interests
  2. they are used as a political tool to justify the use of force against certain groups and to delegitimize their grievances and demands
  3. labelling many things terrorism makes it hard to identify the process that creates it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Behavior-specific definition of terrorism - 3 points

A
  1. Terrorism as a carefully planned tactic of political violence in asymmetric warfare
  2. Usually indiscriminate violence directed at non-combatants
  3. To punsih past behavior and deter future behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Actor-specific definition of terrorism

A

Terrorism as a tactic of armed groups that operate underground, e.g. groups that lack territorial control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Working analytic definition of terrorism (and 3 points)

A

Communicative violence directed against non-combatants undertaken by a politically oriented group
1. Does not include a goal
2. Includes an audience and target
3. Can be carried out by a wide range of agents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 types of terrorism

A
  1. State terrorism (repression)
  2. Domestic terrorism (leftist vs. ethno-national)
  3. Transnational terrorism (post-1998, religion-political)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can IS be classified as a terrorists?

A

They have terrorist activities internationally and in main countries of operation, but they also had territorial control and engaged in other forms of political violence -> highlights that activities of a group are not only terrorism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 2 goals are terrorism ineffective in achieving?

A
  1. Outcome goals (e.g. victory)
  2. Communication of terrorists’ goals (come agree as unable to agree on political compromise)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What 3 goals are terrorism effective in achieving?

A
  1. Demonstrate illegitimacy of the state when they respond repressively
  2. Achieve unity and commitment within the organization
  3. Violence leads to social polarization and greater support for the organization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the main strategic aim of terrorism?

A

To turn their military weakness (low numbers, lack of weapons etc.) into a strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 causes of terrorism according to Crenshaw

A
  1. Situational factors: facilitating conditions (oppression, injustice) vs. specific triggers (e.g. unfair election)
  2. Strategic aims long-term and short-term (turn weakness into strength)
  3. Individual motivations such as high risk acceptance, in-group dynamics, and vengeance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Definition: Process of mobilization

A

Gradual growth of commitment and opposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

3 parts of the process of mobilization of terrorists (and =)

A
  1. Ideological indoctrination (common cause)
  2. In-group dynamics (isolation from regular society)
  3. Importance of political repression for moblization (revenge on repressors)

= process of escalation where context matters

17
Q

The process of mobilization is also a process of

A

Escalation

18
Q

Two types of counterterrorism measures

A
  1. Static defense: protect sites/systems/borders, making it harder to commit successful terrorist attacks
  2. Active defense/offense: limit groups’ ability to perpetrate attacks through intelligence (detect and disrupt), finances (stop state sponsors), and leaders (targeted killings)
19
Q

How is there a trade off between security and liberty?

A

For border security, you need to limit immigration which is important for economic/social reasons; for good intelligence you need surveillance etc.

20
Q

What does it mean to transfer risk

A

Minimize fatalities by transferring the risk to enemy combatants through technology like drones and stealth combers

21
Q

Definition: drone

A

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are remotely piloted or self-piloted aircraft that can carry cameras, sensors, communications equipment or other payloads

22
Q

When did the US use the first weaponized drone?

A

In Afghanistan in 2001

23
Q

3 Advantages of drones

A
  1. Better and timely intelligence (better and longer tracking of targets)
  2. Precise targeting
  3. Avoid capture or loss of manned vehicles and pilots (projecting power without vulnerability)
24
Q

Legal framework of drones

A

Clear in battle zones, but problematic in regions that are not at war with the country using drones

25
Q

5 Points about the US drone war in Pakistan

A
  1. Targeted “active terrorists” who seek to harm American targets
  2. CIA’s mission changed from watch and wait to capture or kill
  3. Followed principles of distinction and proportionality
  4. Limited transparency on strikes and consequences
  5. CIA had too much leeway
26
Q

4 advantages of leadership decapitation

A
  1. Targeting those responsible for leadership and guidance, creating confusion among followers and successors, diverting the organization from pursuing its goals
  2. Less risky than sending in ground troops
  3. No need to detain suspects
  4. Limited consequences for civilians compared to bombings
27
Q

Playstation mentality

A

Operators are distanced from the physical act of killing and the public from their human costs; killing becomes like playing playstation, no remorse or responsibility

28
Q

4 reasons why drone strikes are contested

A
  1. Moral considerations like civilian deaths and playstation mentality
  2. Strategic considerations such as inspiring others to join terrorist groups to get revenge after killings
  3. Ineffectiveness - only 2% of combatants killed were leaders of militant groups, and it prevents them from collecting information from captives
  4. Long-term strategic concerns, such as the opportunity of waging perpetual war that never ends
29
Q

Reading: Obama’s drone war - Trevor McCrisken

A

Obama adminsitration vowed to fight terrorism with greater effectiveness and morality than Bush, adhering to US values

But clear policy shift towards greater reliance on targeted killing by drone strikes. Advantages being no US soldiers killed, disrupting terrorist networks, and a decline in terrorist attacks

BUT raises extensive ethical, political, and legal questions. Success of counter-terrorism increasingly measured by number of suspects killed by drones which is problematic because 1) there is uncertainty about the accuracy of the reports, 2) the dead cannot prove their innocence, 3) terrorism suspects are assumed to be terrorists once they are dead, and 4) the lack of interrogation and trial prevents assessment of their role in terrorism

= immoral way that contradicts core values of US. Risking anger at US worldwide and damaging relations with allies

Use of drones could make the war costless in terms of US lives, leading to risk of perpetual war

30
Q

Reading: Confessions of a drone warrior - Michael Power

A

Personal account of operating drones for US military.

Drones offer tactical advantages: precision of targeting, monitoring suspects from a safe distance, minimizing harm to US personnel, cost-effective, disrupting terrorist networks

Questioning the morality of drones: emotionally draining for operators, human errors, operators making difficult split-second decisions, killing people with no consequences, generating hostility toward US, civilian casualties

Need for greater transparency and accountability in intelligence gathering, and policymakers should be careful when considering using drones