Lecture 7 - Language Processing Flashcards

1
Q

What influences the meaning of language?

A
  • Semantics: The meaning of words
  • Syntax: Sentence structure and thematic roles (who is doing what to whom)
  • Pragmatics: The influence of context on meaning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are key features of sentence processing?

A
  • Immediacy: Interpretation begins as soon as words are heard or read
  • Lexical ambiguity: Words with multiple meanings (e.g., “bank”)
  • Lexical ambiguity: Sentences with multiple possible structures or interpretations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Warren (1970) demonstrate in the Phoneme Restoration Effect? Any limitation?

A
  • Participants “heard” missing phonemes that were replaced by a cough, depending on context (e.g., eel –> wheel/meal/reel/peel)
  • Demonstrates top-down processing
  • Limitation: Retrospective design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do eye movements support sentence comprehension?

A
  • Reading: Eye fixations indicate processing load
  • Listening: Object fixation can show focus comprehension
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does context affect reading time? (Morris, 1994) Which principle does this support?

A
  • Fixation on the word “moustache” was shorter when preceded by “barber” vs. “person”
  • Supports the immediacy principle: interpretation starts immediately
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why do we interpret language immediately rather than wait for full sentences?

A
  • Working memory limitations
  • Processing speed efficiency
  • Example: Google’s autocomplete
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is lexical ambiguity (polysemy)?

A
  • Words like “bank” have multiple meanings (e.g., riverbank or financial institution)
  • Interpretation may involve:
  • Multiple access: All meanings activated
  • Selective access: Only contextually appropriate meaning activated
  • Meaning dominance: More frequent meanings accessed faster
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did Swinney (1979) study ambiguity and meaning activation? What did he find?

A
  • Swinney used cross-modal priming with the ambiguous word “bugs”
  • Participants responded fastest to semantically related probes (e.g., “ANT”)
  • Context filters inappropriate meanings quickly
  • Context filters inappropriate meaning quickly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the results of Swinney’s cross-modal priming study?

A
  • Immediate probe: Priming for both meanings
  • Late probe: Only context-relevant meaning retained
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was shown in Duffy, Morris & Rayner (1988)?

A
  • Readers fixate longer on ambiguous words when the meanings are equally frequent
  • Contextual dominance can influence ease of disambiguation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is syntactic ambiguity?

A
  • Sentences with more than one grammatical interpretation, e.g:
  • “Flying planes can be dangerous.”
  • “I saw the man with the telescope.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is parsing and thematic role assignment in syntax?

A
  • Parsing: Breaking down sentences into syntactic structure
  • Thematic roles:
  • Agent - Instigator
  • Theme - Thing being acted upon
  • Recipient - Receives the theme
  • Additional roles: Location, source, goal, time, instrument
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are phrase structure rules?

A
  • Rules specifying how words combine in a language
  • Native speakers have tactic knowledge of these rules
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is minimal attachment in sentence parsing? Evidence?

A
  • Minimal attachment: Prefer the simplest syntactic structure
  • Evidence from:
  • “The spy saw the cop with the binoculars.” –> Prefer attaching “with the binoculars” to “saw” (minimal)
  • Backtracking required if context forces different interpretation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was shown by Taraban & McClelland (1988)? (Include what they did)

A
  • Used sentences like “The couple admired the house with a garden” vs. “…with a friend”
  • Minimal vs. non-minimal attachment depending on plausibility
  • Trouble for strict minimal attachment - semantic plausibility matters
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the garden path model? Is there a debate?

A
  • Readers initially choose the simplest structure (minimal attachment)
  • If wrong, they must backtrack, creating a “garden path” effect
  • Debate: Is lexical constraint or minimal attachment more dominant?
17
Q

Give a summary of sentence processing principles

A
  • Immediacy of interpretation
  • Lexical ambiguity: Multiple meanings activated
  • Syntactic ambiguity: Sentence structure affects parsing
  • Context and meaning frequently both play a role in resolving ambiguity
18
Q

Name the three influences on language learning

A

Pragmatics, Semantics, Syntax

19
Q

What does the immediacy principle state? (short)

A

Words are integrated into meaning as soon as they are encountered

20
Q

What did Warren (1970) show in the phoneme restoration effect? (short)

A

Context determines what phoneme is heard

21
Q

What did Swinney’s (1979) study show about ambiguity? (short)

A

Multiple meanings are briefly activated

22
Q

In syntactic ambiguity, what is minimal attachment? (short)

A

Choosing the simplest syntactic structure