Lecture 9 - Behaviourism Flashcards

1
Q

Who are the people of Russian Objective Psychology?

A

Ivan Mikhailovich Sechenov 1829 – 1905

Ivan Petrovich Pavlov 1849 – 1936

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who is Ivan Mikhailovich?

A

Ivan Mikhailovich Sechenov 1829 – 1905

  • Studied with German physiologists including
    Müller & von Helmholtz (von helmholtz is studying the speed of reduction)
  • Argued thoughts did not cause behaviour;
    external stimulation did
  • Published Reflexes of the Brain (1863) evoking
    inhibition as an explanation for how
    behaviour could be both reflexive and
    controlled
  • Human development as the establishment of
    inhibitory control over reflexive behaviour

Inhibition
- he showed that stimuluating a frogs nerve csan cause the heart to go slower
- one of the things the nervous system does in inhibit things
- he proposes the idea of inhibition can explain behviour outside of things just being an instinct
- you can think about when you are a kid you sneexe and cough everywhere but when you get older
you inhibit this when it would be inappropriate

This is still not being called psychology this would be called physiolology at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who is Ivan Petrovich Pavlov?

A

Ivan Petrovich Pavlov 1849 – 1936

  • Studied physiology in St.
    Petersburg under a successor of
    Sechenov
  • Discovery of the conditioned
    reflex
  • Relationship to psychology
  • Punctual and perfectionistic at
    work, but romantic and absent-
    minded personally

he discovers the conditioned reflex
- he is a phsyioloigist and is working on digustion in living dogs
- these dohgs are given surgically channells so you can insert something and take
a sample of their fluids
- he gets the 1904 prize of physiolology

Ivan Petrovich Pavlov 1849 – 1936
* Unconditioned stimuli (US) and unconditioned reflexes (UR) – innate
* Conditioned stimuli (CS) and conditioned reflexes (CR)
* Extinction, spontaneous recovery
* Following Sechenev, believed that all
CNS activity was excitation or inhibition (in a cortical mosaic) and all
behaviour was caused by external
events
* Complex human behaviour as “signals
of signals”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who are the people of comparative psychology?

A

Edward Lee Thorndike 1874-1949

Margaret Floy Washburn 1871-1939

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who is Thorndike?

A

Edward Lee Thorndike 1874-1949

he completes the first psychology dissertation on non human animals

  • Studied with James (Harvard), Cattell (Columbia)
  • First psychology dissertation on non-human animals
  • Law of Effect (Found that overtime behaviours that were associated with the
    outcome that the animal wanted were repeated and the behaviours that
    were associated with the outcome the animal did not want die out )
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who is Margaret Floy Washburn?

A

Margaret Floy Washburn 1871-1939

  • Titchener’s first doctoral candidate; 1st woman to
    received a PhD psychology (1894)
  • Long career teaching at Vassar; APA president
  • The Animal Mind (1908), attempting to infer
    consciousness in animals by observing their sensory
    discrimination, space perception, movements, etc.
  • Advanced a motor theory of consciousness
  • Critical of behaviourism and supportive of Gestalt
    psychology (focused on conscious experience)

she makes the argument for a motor theory of consciousness
- she argues that animals perceive the world in terms of their possible
aions, this evokes a arrary of possible actions
- she argues that conciousness is different actions weighted out to different degress
and the one that wins is the one that is performed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the early behaviourist rumblings?

A

In the early 1900s, some functionalists drifted
towards the “behavioristic position”
“Psychology may be most satisfactorily defined as the
science of human behavior. Man may be treated as
objectively as any physical phenomenon. He may be
regarded only with reference to what he does. Viewed in
this way the end of our science is to understand human
action.” – W. Pillsbury, APA president 1910

this big trend is visisbale to the 1910 APA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who is John Watson?

A

John Watson 1878 - 1958

  • Studied in Chicago with Dewey, Angell, and Jacques
    Loeb, a physiologist who studied automatic behaviour
    (such as plants orienting to the sun)
  • Cared for lab rats as paid student work
  • Hired at Uchicago to teach animal and human
    psychology using Titchener’s laboratory manuals; later
    poached by Hopkins
  • Early work on maze learning in rats, tern migration
    with Karl Lashley

(1904 – 1913)
* 1913 lecture series at Columbia, “Psychology as a Behaviorist Views It”
* Responses:
* Too extreme: Angell, Calkins, Cattell, Washburn, Woodworth
* A technology of behavior but not a science: Titchener
* Sympathetic, but concerned it could become “a restrictive orthodoxy” Thorndike
* Little Albert with Rosalie Rayner, 1920
* Expulsion from JHU following discovery of affair
* Movement into advertising

many of the figures we have talked about thus far respond to this
- Thorndike thinks this idea is too restrictive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Psychology as the Behaviorist views it is a purely objective
experimental branch of natural science.
Its theoretical goal is the prediction and control of behavior.
Introspection forms no essential part of its methods […]
The Behaviorist, in his efforts to get a unitary scheme of animal
response, recognizes no dividing line between man and brute.
- John B. Watson, 1913 Psychological Review

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who is Edward Tolman?

A

Edward Tolman 1886 – 1956
* Argued that behaviour is purposive (goal-
directed) and shaped by cognitions
* Demonstration of cognitive maps and latent
learning in rats (1930s); both examples of
learning without reinforcement

argues that behaviour is goal directed and is supported by cognition
- does a lot of work with animals to show that there are these nternal cognitions
- shows that the animal does not produce the exact
sequence of beghaviours that were previously recinforced
- goes to the spacial location of the food -> shows that the animal has made a spacial representation of the food this would be a cognitive map

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who is Clark Hull?

A

Clark Hull 1884 – 1952
* Argued that behaviour follows testable,
quantifiable laws
* Intended to extend this even to social behaviour
* All learning requires reinforcement

Tolman disagrees quite a bit with Hull
- Hull produces complex equations that produce all behviour
- ppl can test these laws and see when they work and when they do not work
- does allow ppl to engage with the scientific process that is fruitfull for the field
- he in the 1930s argues that what they need to do is identify these laws that can layer
be connected to machines

Believed that thinking machines could be
constructed: “It should be a matter of no great difficulty to
construct parallel inanimate mechanisms, even from inorganic
materials, which will genuinely manifest the qualities of
intelligence, insight, and purpose, and which, insofar, will be truly
psychic.” (1930!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who is Burrhus Frederic Skinner?

A

Burrhus Frederic (BF) Skinner 1904-1990

  • Undergraduate life
  • Career at Minnesota, Indiana, Harvard
  • Materialist: consciousness as a non-physical
    entity does not exist
  • Believed that “mental events” are simply verbal
    labels for certain bodily processes:
  • “What is felt or introspectively observed is not some
    nonphysical world of consciousness, mind or mental
    life but the observer’s own body” – Skinner, 1974

Majors in English and did not take psychology courses
- Trouble marker in his undergraduate
- is unsucessful at trying to be a writer and goes back to school to take psychology courses

  • Studied operant behaviour, controlled by
    consequences (= RS psychology)
  • Reinforcement and punishment
  • Schedules of reinforcement
    (fixed/variable, ratio/interval)

and how this changes the likelihood that an animal will produce that behaviour in the future

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Comparison of Behaviourists

A

that behavior could be completely explained in terms of events external to the
organism.
For Watson, environmental events elicit either learned or unlearned responses; for Skinner, the environment selects behavior via reinforcement contingencies. For both, what goes on within the organism is relatively unimportant.
In contrast, Hull exempli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who is Marian and Keller Breland?

A

Marian and Keller Breland

  • Students of Skinner
    (30s, 40s)
  • Applied operant
    conditioning to
    animal training
  • Animal Behavior
    Enterprises 40s-50s
  • IQ Zoo 1955

They take his discoveries about operant conditioning in animals and take animal training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Discuss:

Where do you see the language and principles of behaviourism still
used today?
e.g., reinforce, punish, extinguish, shaping, habituation…

Skinner wrote a utopian novel based on his principles of operant
conditioning, Walden II. Critics argued that his ideas took away freedom and
dignity from human beings.
He argued back, in another book Beyond Freedom and Dignity, that:
The bad do bad because the bad is rewarded. The good do good because the
good is rewarded. There is no true freedom or dignity. Right now, our
reinforcers for good and bad behavior are chaotic and out of our control –
it’s a matter of having good or bad luck with your “choice” of parents,
teachers, peers, and other influences. Let’s instead take control, as a society,
and design our culture in such a way that good gets rewarded and bad gets
extinguished!

Some might argue that Behaviourism narrowed the field of psychology
in ways that limited its development for decades.
Others might argue that Behaviourism’s break with philosophy,
introspection, and consciousness as a focus of study, was why
psychology was able to progress as a science in the 20th century.
Which argument do you favour? What evidence supports your
position? What evidence might be applied against it?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly