Lesson 8 & 9- Causality Assessment Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

What is causality assessment? What is causality assessment?

A

A method to determine the extent of the relationship between a drug and a suspected adverse reaction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define ADR (Adverse Drug Reaction).

A

An unintended, harmful effect attributable to a drug at normal doses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define AE (Adverse Event).

A

An undesirable occurrence during drug treatment, not necessarily causally linked to the drug.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List the basic criteria for causality assessment.

A
  1. Temporal relationship.
  2. Dechallenge (improvement after stopping the drug).
  3. Rechallenge (recurrence upon re-exposure).
  4. Biological plausibility.
  5. Exclusion of other causes (diseases, drugs).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is temporal relationship?

A

The event occurs within a plausible timeframe after drug administration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is dechallenge?

A

Recurrence of the adverse event after restarting the drug.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is rechallenge?

A

Recurrence of the adverse event after restarting the drug.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What defines a “Certain” causality per WHO-UMC?

A
  • Clear causal evidence.
  • Positive dechallenge and rechallenge.
  • Other causes ruled out.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What defines “Probable” causality per WHO-UMC?

A
  • Likely causal relationship.
  • Positive dechallenge.
  • Other causes unlikely.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What defines “Possible” causality per WHO-UMC?

A
  • Temporal relationship exists.
  • Other causes may contribute.
  • Insufficient evidence for higher causality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What defines “Unlikely” causality per WHO-UMC?

A
  • Little evidence of causality.
  • Alternative explanation exists.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What Naranjo score indicates a “Definite” ADR?

A

≥9.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What Naranjo score indicates a “Probable” ADR?

A

5–8.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What Naranjo score indicates a “Possible” ADR?

A

1–4.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which Naranjo question assesses rechallenge?

A

“Did the adverse event reappear when the drug was readministered?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is biological plausibility addressed in the Naranjo scale?

A

Alternative causes?
Previous conclusive reports?

17
Q

A patient develops dizziness 45 minutes after taking an antihypertensive. Symptoms resolve on stopping the drug and recur on rechallenge. What is the causality?

A

Certain (WHO-UMC).

18
Q

A patient develops synovitis after IV pamidronate. Symptoms resolve on stopping the drug. Other medications include letrozole. What is the causality?

A

Possible (concomitant drugs may contribute).

19
Q

A patient’s arthritis worsens after pamidronate. No improvement on dechallenge. What is the causality?

A

Unlikely (negative dechallenge).

20
Q

List challenges in causality assessment.

A
  • Polypharmacy.
  • Underlying diseases mimicking ADRs.
  • Incomplete information.
  • Variability in clinical responses.
21
Q

How does WHO-UMC differ from Naranjo?

A
  • WHO-UMC: Qualitative, uses categories (Certain/Probable/Possible).
  • Naranjo: Quantitative, uses a scoring system (0–13).
22
Q

What is global introspection?

A

Expert judgment-based causality assessment (subjective).

23
Q

What is the maximum possible score on the Naranjo scale?

A

13 (though scores ≥9 indicate “Definite” ADR).

24
Q

How is Question 5 in the Naranjo scale scored?

A
  • Yes (alternative causes exist): -1
  • No (no alternative causes): +2
25
When is a case labeled **"Unclassifiable"** per WHO-UMC?
When insufficient information (e.g., missing dechallenge data, unclear timeline) prevents a causality judgment.
26
What is a limitation of **probabilistic methods** (e.g., Bayesian analysis) in causality assessment?
Requires extensive data and specialized skills, making it impractical for routine use.
27
Why was the **aggravated arthritis case** (negative dechallenge) deemed **"Unlikely"**?
No improvement after stopping the drug (negative dechallenge) and alternative explanations (e.g., disease progression).