machiavelli the prince Flashcards
(20 cards)
style
- Has not “prettified the book or padded it out with pompous or pretentious words.”
- No “irrelevant flourishes”
aimsof the prince
- “controversial” “code of conduct”
- “republics and kingdoms which bear no resemblance to experience and never existed in reality.”
- “imagined republics’ < “effectual truth”
predestination in the prince
- “luck” gives people the “initial opportunity”; “without this opportunity their talent would have gone begging- need to act w virtu
- Medici house “fine qualities and fortune, favoured by God and the Church”
look to religion for suport- prince
- “country is praying to God to send someone to save her”
fotrune the prince
hardly worth making an effort” – “leaned a bit that way myself”
* “luck decides the half of what we do”
statecraft- type sofstate prince
- Dialectical: the commons “are eager not to be ordered around or oppressed.” While the Nobles are “eager to oppress the common people and order them around”
brutality and nec
- “pamper or destroy”
- “if you harm them a little they’ll hit back”
- “destroy” a free republic when conquering it
- “much safer to be feared than loved” – Hannibal vs Scipio
borgia
borgia
beheading of Remirro de Orco “propose him as a model” for rulership; his cruelty was in fact “much more compassionate” than the actions of the Florentines “whose reluctance to be thought cruel led to disaster at Pistoia.”
limits to barabarism
above all else, must guard against being despised and hated’
leads to inevitable downsfal as did with
- you’ll always have to be wielding the knife and you’ll never be able to count on your subjects.”
- antoninus and pertinax and commodus
antoninus
committed very many deeds of unexampled barbarity’, so that ‘he became greatly hated by everyone’ and ‘was killed by a centurion in the midst of his own troops’ (67–8).
partinax and comodus delcine
hated as well as despised, as a result of which they were both assassinated (66, 68).
florentine histories - why written
- Previous histories “wholly” inadequate, especially in the neglect of the importance of “tumults”.
- Panegyric to the Medici
florentine histories obejctivity
- “never sought to cloak a dishonourable deed with a spurious defence”
- “no one who fairly judges my works will reproach of me as a flatterer.”
flroentine histories subverive to his patronage
- perverse behaviour” of the previous government rather than their own attributes - reason for the Medici’s rise to power.
- Focus on Cosimo’s rise
cosimo rise
emphasises the importance of his wealth; also focuses on the “private” and “partisan” methods which he used – contrasting against the more honourable “public” methods of Neri Capponi.
fortune fh
- likens fortuen to a wheel undergoing revolutions
- tempting fortune
- ‘worldy things are not allowed by nature to stand still
fh- human nature
- “men are always more given to covet what they cannot have”
- “the more authority men get, the worst use they make of it”
fh on corruption of the state
‘young men of Florence alienated from the values of the past, spent excessive amounts of money on clothes, banquets and lascivious pleasures’
medici excessive use f wealth holds hem accountable for this
why no liberty called for before
‘for the ears of the people had been stopped by the prosperity and bounty of the Medici nd liberty was no longe known in florence’