tacitus context Flashcards
(17 cards)
tacitus influenced by writers
sallust
Livy
cicero
thucydides
seneca he younger
Pliny the younger
pliny the younger
Pliny and Tacitus were friends and peers, both rising through the senatorial ranks in the late 1st century CE.
Much of what we know about their relationship comes from Pliny’s Letters, especially:
Letter 6.16 and 6.20, where Pliny describes the eruption of Vesuvius for Tacitus.
Letter 7.33, in which Pliny praises Tacitus’s skill and encourages him to continue writing., eaders will think his history was lived rather than written
sallust impact
86-35bce
Tacitus’s brevitas (concise style), moralistic tone, and focus on the decline of Roman virtue echo Sallust’s Catiline and Jugurtha. Both authors are concerned with corruption and moral decay in Roman public life
sallust simlariteis tactus
Dense, pointed Latin; dramatic portrayals of historical figures; interest in psychology and motives.
sallust diff tacitus
allust wrote about the late Republic, Tacitus about the early Empire, but both frame history as a moral decline.
Livy tacitus
59bce-17ce
ivy’s monumental Ab Urbe Condita provided Tacitus with a long Republican and early Imperial precedent. Tacitus is less idealistic than Livy but shares an interest in Rome’s moral foundations.
Similarities: Use of exempla to convey moral lessons; interest in Roman character.
Livy diff
Livy was more optimistic and patriotic; Tacitus more cynical and focused on decline under the Principate.
cicero
106-43bce
Though not a historian, Cicero’s political writings and speeches influenced Tacitus’s vocabulary, rhetoric, and conception of liberty and the senatorial role.
Notable influence: Tacitus’s concern for libertas and senatorial dignity reflects Cicero’s Republican ideals.
Rhetorical influence: Dialogic structure in the Dialogus de Oratoribus mimics Ciceronian philosophical dialogues.
Thucydides
460-400bce
Tacitus admired Thucydides’ analytical approach, tragic tone, and focus on power and human nature. He models aspects of his Annals and Histories on Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War.
Similarities: Pessimistic view of politics; focus on internal conflict, speeches, and analysis of character.
seneca he younger
4bce-65ce
As a Stoic philosopher and political figure under Nero, Seneca influenced Tacitus’s tone and moral critique of imperial excess.
Overlap: Both critique tyranny and highlight the corruption of power.
diff tacitus and seneca the younger
Tacitus is less doctrinally Stoic, but uses Stoic martyrdoms (e.g., Thrasea Paetus) to critique imperial repression.
how classists and historians matus diffy look at taci- classists
- look at tacitus literary artist, moralist stylist, emphasising reading of his rhetoric and language
- compared to Livy sallust Thucydides and seneca for style and moralism
how classists and historians vary view of tacitus- historians
- source of roman history politics and society under empire
- debating how limited or ideologically shaped he is but ultimately extracting historical truth
- comparing Suetonius Josephus and inscriptions for cross checking facts
literary context tacitus
- tands in dialogue with Roman historians like Sallust and Livy, and with Greek models like Thucydides and Herodotus.
- lso reflects the Silver Age of Latin literature—marked by brevity, epigrammatic style, irony, and moral cynicism.
phil and ethical context for tacitus
Stoicism was influential among Roman elites, and Tacitus admired figures like Thrasea Paetus and Helvidius Priscus, who resisted imperial tyranny.
He does not write as a philosopher, but his ethical concern with virtue, liberty, and corruption aligns with Stoic and Ciceronian values.
His work often implicitly contrasts Stoic endurance with moral compromise under despotic rulers.
who did tacitus write for
- sneators and magistrates- fellow members, understood ref to political fear
- educated roman readers- men trained in rhetoric, philosophy and history, appreciated dense allusive latin, classical models and stylistic innovations
- future genertaion- importance of memory and truth, moral warning to future
- leaders/emeror- texts suggest indiret dialogue imperial power
why did tacitus write
range of reasons- exhonerate own guilt, preserve history for posterity, family respect
- overall though political act- act of defiance, warning, recording deifnance