Tacitus- style and intro Flashcards

(93 cards)

1
Q

tacitus who was he

A
  • Roman senator, orator and lawyer
  • Bron in ad55
  • Public career spanning rule of vesparin to trajan
  • Part of literary circle – pliny lots of letters, seutonis (biogrspher- lievs of ceasars) – knew each other and corresponded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

tacitus relationshio senator

A
  • Quindecemvi, gives the funeral oration for Lucius Rufus in AD 97.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

polubius historian

A

the reciprocal benefits of history and politics. History helps one to “bear with dignity the vicissitudes of fortune.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

aims as a senatorial historian - tacitus

A

trying to teach - because few people have the good sense to distinguish what is honourable from what is bad, or what is expedient from what is harmful
or rebellious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

tacitus rebellious as senatorial historian

A

indvid acting against ov that ‘imagined’ ‘it could silence the voice of freedom’ and ‘mens knowledge of the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

senatorail historians

A
  • Cato, Pollio, Pictor, Caesar, Ammianus, Sallust.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

sallust

A

disatrously worng
whilts livy the exception
perhaps in reltaionto political leanings and methodologies as person, sallust much more moralising

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sallust view on leaders

A

Sallust may have used history to justify Caesar’s actions and criticize the optimates.
His portrayal of figures like Catiline or Jugurtha is often seen as crafted to support a political narrative rather than truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

tacitus is self- interested as a historian

A

quinitilian
fsmily piety
describes himself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

quintillian on tacitus

A

preserve a memory for posterity and enhance the memory of its author.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

agricola family piety

A

o Agricola 1- ‘famous men have from time immemorial had their life stories told’ ‘our generaton..ha mot quite abandoned the pratcice’
o The task of recording it never failed to attract the men of genius- self congratulating?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

quote perhaps talkig about himself- self interested

A

great men even under bad emperors”, but has no time for men who “have become famous by an ostentatious death with no benefit to the Commonwealth.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

politicla guilt- tacitus

A

melllor
background
other historians
danger of principate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

politicla guilt tacitus mellor

A

the guilt of an unwilling collaborator or merely the shame of a survivor?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

tacitus quotes own time- politicla guilt

A
  • Histories 1.1: career “started by Vespasian, enhanced by Titus, carried further by Domitian.”
    o Acknowledges why people conformed and stayed quite
  • Nerva and Trajan “blessed and happy age” when you can “think what you want and say what you think.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

other historians politicla guilt

A

sallust equally hypocritical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

political gult- teaching toll

A
  • Writing to his own time: Cremutius Cordus = Hermogenes of Tarsus under Domitian.
  • Highlight the dangers of the principate- eg Domitian (Agricola) and tib (annals) esp pertinent tacitus- historical genre under threat w bok burnings at comitium and forum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

tacitus self aware

A

what may be interesting to reader
despite dire period still find good examples
whilst livy talks about big issues
sallust
cicero
thucydiedes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

tacitus aware what writing percieved

A

anals iv- aware what writing ‘may seem unimportant and trivial
o Whilst other historians may teoll of ‘great wars’ or ‘the storming of cities’
o ‘my task is circumscribed and inglorious’
o Not much to write abnout in period – ‘peace was wholly unbroken, or only slightly disturbed’.. ‘the emperor was uninterested in expanding the empire’ ‘there was dismal misery in the capital’
o Themes therefore- ‘curel orders, unremitting accusations, treacherous freindships’ ‘distruction fo innocent men and the rempetitive resons for their desth’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

tacitus despite dire period

A

histories 1 3
‘yet the age was not so barren in nonoblequalities, as not also to exhibit examples of vritue’
o ‘illustrious men driven to the last necessity and enduring it with fortutde’
o ‘there were closing scnes that equaled famous deaths of antiquity’- still is dramatic and exciting
o Annals iii 55- ‘our epoch too has produced moral and inyellectual achievements fit for our descendents to copy’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

livy- tacitus seld aware

A

o History of rome- humble- ‘whetyher I am likely to acmplish anything worthy of labour..i do not know
o Commemorate the deeds of ythe foremost people of the world
o Perhaps less objective?- it is the privilege of antiquity to mingle divine things with human, and so to add dignity to the beginning of cities
o Purpose of study of history – ‘behold the lessons of every kind of experience’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

sallust- self aware

A

seemingly frustrated by critic and perception of writing
o ‘most readers consider that whatever errors you mention with censure, are mentioned trhough aleolence and envy
o Equally if write of ‘great virtue and glory of eminent men’- ‘all beyond his conception he rgards as fictious and increadible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

ciccro- self aware

A

de legibus- character of atticus persuading cicero to writ ehistory of rome- in orde rthst the land which you have saved you may also glorify, for our national lit is deficient in history
o This branch of lit is closer thsn any other to roatory
o De oratore- history ‘sheds light upon reality//guidance to human existance’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

thucydides self aware- historicla method

A

history of the peloponnesan war- ‘events of the war’ ‘made it a principle not to write down the first story that came my way ‘ ‘eyewitneses whose reports I have checked with as much thoroughness as possible ‘
o

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
challenge for thucydides historian
Although ‘not that the truth was easy to discover’ as each eyewitness ‘speaking out of partiality for one sie of the other or else form imperfect memories o Is objective as possible o Legacy – ‘my work is not a piece of wirting designed to meet the taste of an immediate public, but was done to last forever’
26
hist o n tacitus hist methods
syme woodman
27
syme tacitus method
assidous archival historian
28
woodman hist method
anachronistic and point t o the flaws ins ysme arguments
29
tacitus use of documentary reports
memoirs of younegr agrippina 4.53 letter by tiberius 6,6.1= Suetonius
30
* Memoirs of the younger Agrippina 4.53
Tacitus refers to these lost memoirs, likely written by Agrippina the Younger, as a source. They would’ve been personal, politically charged, and insider in tone. This shows Tacitus used private, possibly biased documents alongside public records. Raises questions about how critically he read his sources.
31
* Letter by Tiberius 6.6.1 = Suetonius
Tacitus quotes a Tiberian letter, which also appears in Suetonius, suggesting they both accessed official archives or collections of imperial correspondence. This strengthens the idea that Tacitus used archival material. But it's debated how carefully he did so (see below).
32
debate over if tacitus was an archival historian
Syme and D.R. Walker: Argue that Tacitus was a serious, archival researcher, drawing on records like the Acta Senatus and Acta Diurna. A.J. Woodman: Challenges this,
33
syme and qalker
a serious, archival researcher, drawing on records like the Acta Senatus and Acta Diurna.
34
woodman on tacitus archival hist
emphasizing that Tacitus was more of a literary artist than a forensic historian — he shaped material for dramatic and moral effect.
35
evidence of tacitus use of archival resources
nnals 3.3.2: Mentions the diurna in the context of Germanicus’ funeral. Annals 13.57: Mentions German salt production, possibly sourced from bureaucratic records. but senatus not mentioned until later
36
archival resources available
acta senatus acta diurnaac
37
acta senatus
officla senate records
38
acta diurna
public gazette like a daily bulletin of events decrees and gossop
39
senatus not mentioed until later
book 15 delay raises doubts. If Tacitus was truly using these from early on, why the silence for 14 books? It suggests either: He didn’t rely on them early, Or he used them selectively or indirectly.
40
evidence tacitus missing what was in the archives
Tacitus claims he doesn’t know the family background of Seius Quadratus, but that information is in the Acta Senatus. Suggests he either didn’t consult them thoroughly or preferred other sources.
41
symes evidence for tacitus weakness
Seneca in Tacitus' account refers to Agrippa retiring in 23 BC, but official records show Agrippa was: Tribune in 18 BC Governor in 17 BC This is a factual error that Tacitus could’ve avoided by cross-checking records — Syme uses it as an example of Tacitus accepting received narrative over documents.
42
tacitus archival in relation to other historians at tiem
more so than earlier historians like livy or cato the elder relied more on oral trad, family lore and annalistic sources
43
syme susopicions on sources used
Common Source for Tacitus, Dio, Suetonius Ronald Syme speculates they may have drawn from a shared (now lost) source, possibly an imperial archive or contemporary historian. Explains overlapping content between them.
44
marsh v syme on aristcoratic oral trad
tacitus heay detail oral aristocratic trad syme- disacrees too good of. historian
45
syme disaggree with marsh
denies Tacitus would let personal or oral sources override historical rigour.
46
marsh on tacitus
Tacitus includes vivid details like someone’s “grim face” (e.g. during the Cordus trial) or Sejanus reacting to a joke — material not likely from archives. Marsh argues these come from oral aristocratic tradition: family stories passed down, especially where Tacitus knew the family. arsh is more convincing in showing Tacitus is more sympathetic and more detailed when writing about families he knew — suggesting emotional proximity influenced his narrative.
47
historigoarphical views on tacitus as a monarchist
bossier mommsen kraus
48
hist- bossier on tacitus
argued monarchist from biographical perspective
49
mommsen- hist veiws on Tacitus
Tacitus is a monarchist… out of despair” for human nature. *
50
textual evidence tacitus is a monarchist
1.2.2: “the rivalries of factions, the avarice of magistrates and the impotence of laws”
51
syme on tacitus a monarchist
- oligarchy was the ‘supreme, central and endurinh theme in roman history ‘ - Oligarchy was the conc of power in a small group fo men ‘about 20 or 30 men’ who held ‘a monopoly of office and power’ and were ‘drawn from a doze dominant families ‘
52
reception of tacitus - popularity when
- Popular late renaissance period- wit hpolitical histories being written at the time o But alsoe read as a cynic and stylist oo
53
tacitus objective quote
without rancour or bias” (Ann) and “without partiality or hatred” (Hist)
54
hist views on tacitus objectivity
reid lord
55
redi tacitus objectivity
(1921): Highly critical. Argues Tacitus is not objective, especially in Agricola, and that his hatred of Domitian distorts the historical picture.
56
lord tacitus objectivity
ushes back on Reid, suggesting that Tacitus’ literary artistry is crucial to how he communicates themes like tyranny, virtue, and memory. Defends the use of oral history and rumour as legitimate sources of cultural memory — Tacitus carefully selects what to include and actively condemns trivial gossip in the Annals. Implies that the rhetorical choices Tacitus makes are not necessarily deceptive, but part of a deeper truth-telling strategy about the moral and emotional realities of tyranny.
57
domitian in agricola- objectivuity
yme and Mellor both argue that the Domitian figure in Agricola is a stylised construct, a tyrannical foil built to elevate Agricola’s silent resistance. Tacitus may exaggerate or invent elements to fit a dramatic and moral framework, not a strictly factual one.
58
examples where domitian could be a construct
40.2: Domitian tries to test Agricola with a bribe – Dorey calls this “sheer fabrication.” 43.2: Domitian tries to poison Agricola – again highly suspect, more literary than evidentiary.
59
tacitus among other historians contemp objectivity
sallust pliny the younger mellor
60
sallust on objectivity tacitus
quoted by Tacitus as being “free from ambition, fear, or partisan politics” — an ideal Tacitus seems to emulate, but which modern critics doubt he lives up to.
61
pliny the younger- comparative historiography
Praises Tacitus for “atypical precision”, which reveals ancient conceptions of bias: careful presentation and moral clarity were valued more than strict neutrality.
62
mellor - tacitus historiography
bias” in antiquity wasn’t about ideology, but personal motives like grievance, fear, or flattery. Tacitus’ personal connection to Agricola might explain his partiality, but it wouldn’t be seen as discrediting in ancient eyes.
63
authors licence though
may adapt to show message Tiberius public voice mellor Boudicca speech aristides
64
aristides tacitus
second-century rhetorician Aristides famously said historians like Tacitus stood “between orators and poets.” Perfect summary of Tacitus: he borrows the moral urgency of oratory and the tragic tone of epic, crafting narratives that are emotionally and politically charged, not strictly factual.
65
Boudicca speech licence
Highly stylised and unlikely to be verbatim — Tacitus wasn’t there, and no Roman would have recorded it. Shows his tendency to construct speeches that reflect his ideological themes (e.g. freedom vs. oppression). Like Sallust and Thucydides, Tacitus uses speeches to dramatize conflict, not to report dialogue.
66
mellor tacitus
- exaggerate tyranny under Tiberius, fewer than 100 people were executed in 23 years — yet Tacitus presents it as a reign of terror. This shows how Tacitus exaggerates for moral and literary effect, using phrases like “continual slaughter” not to document statistics, but to capture the atmosphere of fear. His tyranny is as much psychological and rhetorical as physical.
67
nero Tacitus licence
Annals 15.36) Nero cancels his visit citing “the public interest,” but Tacitus implies it was politically calculated, not sincere. Reinforces Tacitus’ theme of political theatre and dishonesty in imperial discourse. The "public voice" is just that — a voice, not the truth.
68
tacitus Tiberius
More contrived than he was really thought to feel” – Tiberius Tacitus uses this phrase to describe the disjunction between political performance and inner reality — a hallmark of his portrait of Tiberius. It illustrates his belief that in imperial Rome, language is hollowed out, and public speech is a performance masking private motivations. This deep suspicion of official language permeates the Annals, and explains Tacitus' cynicism about imperial institutions.
69
didactic
- intended to teacht
70
tacitus as a didactic historian
Livy cato
71
Livy on value of history
aims the “fruitful advantage to be derived from the study of the past” lies in: Seeing examples of virtue to imitate. Learning from vice to avoid. History is a moral classroom — not just about facts, but about moulding character. Tacitus, though more cynical, still follows this tradition — especially in Agricola, where moral judgment and exemplarity are central.
72
Cato the elder- didactic
mocked historians who focused on things like: “How often grain was costly; how often darkness or something else blocked the light of the moon or the sun.” He preferred to write moral and political history, not annalistic trivia. This aligns with the Roman suspicion of pedantic or meaningless detail in favour of virtue, action, and utility.
73
tactistu irony- sillier to cato
Annals 4.33): - Tacitus ironically says that such “petty trifles” have now become the most “apposite” to record. - Because under tyranny, truth is suppressed, and historians are forced to write between the lines. -What was once mocked becomes meaningful — a critique of imperial censorship and the decay of open political life. - Shows Tacitus' layered irony: he shares the old Roman values but acknowledges they’re now unworkable.
74
ecomiastic history
praise of great men agricola cicero
75
agricola- escomiatic
rologue: Tacitus justifies his writing as a way to: “Record for posterity the deeds and characters of famous men… and great and outstanding excellence.” - echoes the tradition of funerary praise (laudatio) and biography as moral instruction. - The Agricola is a hybrid of biography, eulogy, and history — a deeply Roman genre mix.
76
cicero on history
history is the elaboration of achievements — a way to immortalise virtue. Orators and historians both aim to preserve the memory of Rome’s greatness, especially in individuals. This is encomiastic and didactic: telling stories not just to inform, but to inspire and instruct.
77
cicero on the orator
- not say anything false - chronological - topographical descriptions - slow and regular fluency
78
annalistic structure and style
- tacitus and the form of republican history - ceremonial republic, hollowed constitution - literary and functional effects of structure - cicero and oigns o fannalsitic gsrto
79
cicero and origins of annalistic history
De Oratore II.52, Cicero describes early Roman history as a: “Compilation of annals” These records were originally: Kept by the pontifex maximus, Built around the annual turnover of magistrates, Creating a natural structure: each year, a new chapter in Roman life.
80
tacitus and form of republican history
nnalistic Structure as Political Commentary The Annals are structured year-by-year, with each book opening by naming the consuls, e.g. Annals 4.1: “In the consulate of Gaius Asinius and Gaius Antistius Vetus…” This reflects the old Roman practice of marking time by magistrates, rooted in the Annales Maximi—records kept by the pontifex maximus from the early Republic.
81
why does tacitus use annalistic structure
itualistic performance that highlights the facade of continuity. Ann. 1.7.3: He even refers to consular dating as happening “as though in the old Republic.” This creates a powerful ironic contrast: the form of Republican freedom vs. the reality of imperial domination.
82
ceremonial republic, hollowed constitution
acitus’ use of archaic language and Republican forms mimics the historical dignity of Sallust and Livy, but in a darker key: It recalls civic tradition, but what it really reveals is how far Rome has fallen. These “republican signals” are now empty pageantry — a regime pretending to be a Republic, while functioning as monarchy.
83
literary and functional effects of the structure
foreshadowing chronological restraint and resistance
84
literary and functional effects- foreshadows
igid yearly format, Tacitus can build suspense, letting events unfold gradually across time. E.g. the death of Germanicus and rise of Sejanus are developed across multiple books with ominous undertones.
85
chronological restraint and resistance- tacitus annal
chafes at the structure he’s imposed: “If I had not proposed to record each event under its own year, I should have liked to anticipate and recount immediately…” (Ann. 4.32) This signals how the form becomes part of the message — he is forced to obey the chronology, just as Roman senators were forced to obey imperial performance.
86
tacitus style as moral commentary
writers licence and artistic invention woodman juxtaposition. as political tool fratricide loss of moral compass sparing use of speeches
87
88
annals 2.63- critic invention
claims to have the original speech of Tiberius but crafts his own version—emphasizing tone, irony, and judgement rather than simply reproducing.
89
Arminius and flavus 2.9-10
ictionalised dialogue between Arminius and Flavus (Ann. 2.9–10) across the river shows how Tacitus uses dramatic staging for thematic weight—not literal accuracy.
90
woodman tacitus style of writing
irregular syntaxx obsession w variation
91
woodman irregular syntax
eflective of political anxiety and psychological tension: Ann. 1.44.5: Sentence begins with “if”, is broken midway by “but”, leaving the logic disjointed—mirroring the instability of the times
92
juxtaposition as political tool
mutiny v senate virtue in unexpected places civil war as internal collapse
93