tacitus- themes Flashcards

(89 cards)

1
Q

tacitus themes

A

fortune
fate
propehcies
religion
liberty and loss
sympathy evoed
tacitus republican?
corruption legal system
senate
tyranny
aristocratic noble families

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

aristocratic noble famliies

A

o Rome adoption useful mechanism which looked to consolidate power in a smal group
o
o Noble families have earmarked power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

example how noble families earmark power

A

o Augustus adopted Agrippa sons gaius and Lucias casear and had ‘consulshops reserved for them’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

noble families preordainpower

A

Tib adopted by augusts given ‘civil and military authjirty ‘ and ‘the powers of the truben’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

fortune

A

o Tiberius had learnt “how exposed to the caprices of fortune was the task of universal rule.”
predictions
claudius accession
sejenus rise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

sejanus rise

A

attributed to “heaven’s wrath against Rome”
- - “Suddenly fortune deranged everything; the emperor became a cruel tyrant, as well as an abettor of cruelty in others. Of this the cause and origin was Ælius Sejanus…” Yet, Sejanus’ rise is a sign of “heaven’s wrath against Rome.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

signs fortune

A

o 8 eagles in the battle between Germanicus and Arminius; a lunar eclipse cows the Pannonia mutiny.
o Apollo at Claros, “prophesised to (Germanicus), in dark hints, as oracles usually do, an early doom.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

claudius acession

A

similar to sejenus and fortune similarly personified
Claudius is ‘the princeps-to-be that Fortune was keeping in hiding.’

    • Clearly, the very last man marked out for empire by public opinion,
    • whom fortune was holding in reserve as the emperor of the future. – a warning to readers to expect the unexpected.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

fate

A

griffin
not a causal force
but can be a reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

griffin fate

A

 Griffin: divine intervention the most common causation:
- H4.78 Romans’ unlikely victory against the Gauls and the Germans.
-A12.43 famine relief comes quickly.
-A14.5 the starry night and calm see allows Agrippina’s murderer to be detected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

romans unlikely victory agianst the gaul

A

Tacitus describes the suppression of the Batavian revolt (69–70 CE) led by Civilis and supported by various Germanic and Gallic tribes. The Romans, under the command of Petillius Cerialis, secure an unexpected victory despite the strength and unity of the rebels.

Expanded Commentary:

“Unlikely victory”: Tacitus highlights the chaos of the Year of the Four Emperors (69 CE), during which Roman military strength was divided. That the Romans manage to defeat the combined Germanic and Gallic forces is seen as improbable — a testament to Roman military resilience but also luck.
Rhetorical tone: Tacitus may be emphasizing how fragile imperial control had become and yet how it paradoxically endured.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

famine relief comes quickly

A

Annals XII.43, Tacitus recounts a famine that breaks out in Rome. Emperor Claudius is commended for his swift and effective response to the crisis, ordering grain shipments and keeping the peace.

Expanded Commentary:

Rare praise: Tacitus, typically scathing about emperors, offers Claudius rare credit here. This moment of competence contrasts with the more frequent failures of imperial governance elsewhere in the Annals.
Political messaging: This scene helps Tacitus explore themes of good governance versus tyranny. Efficient logistical action by Claudius stands in relief against the courtly intrigue and moral decay that dominate his reign.
but might be ironic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

shoudl fate be doubted

A

never gives us any reason to doubt that fatum should be taken seriously as a causative force. All three of these examples are given in propria persona with no obvious irony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

fate is a reason thouh

A

Varus, however, succumbed to his fate and the sword of Arminius” – in this case it is causal over- dermination in which we are offered both. Here, given it is not an or, he explicitly cites fate as a reason.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

prophecies

A

germanics and appolo at claros
Curtis Rufus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

germanicus and apollo at claros

A

Germanicus’ deathbed complaint that he is not ‘giving in to fate’ (2.71.1) should perhaps be seen in this light.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

curtius rufus

A

the spectre of a woman prophesises he will return to Africa as a Consul. Tacitus recognises the psychological effect of the prophesy in contributing to its own fulfilment, and he is aided by human factors (generosity and supp of the Princeps), but come to fruition it does.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

otehr historians on fate

A

appian, l ivy,plutarch and polybius importance of fate as a historical actor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

livy fortunes

A

reports prodigies at the end of the narrative year, which tends to strip them of clear causal force and reduces them to official status.
 - Fortune however takes a prominent role: Machiavelli Disc, Livy thinks Fortune the cause of the greatness of the Roman Empire.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

religion

A
  • sympathy for rites and rituals for past - good thing
  • his own past
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

taciitus sympathetic to rites and rituals of past

A

chimes with his nostalgia for the republic and the uncorrupted people: ‘All rites are repetitive, and repetition automatically implies continuity with the past.’ (Connerton).

pax deorum: rituals had to be performed consistently in order to keep Rome on good terms with her gods and ensure her survival. – Tacitus subscribes to this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

tacitus experience rleigion

A
  • priestly responsibilities and cult practice has been attributed to his position as a quindecemvir, acquired under Domitian.
  • : magistrates were also priests. He was also praetor which also had involvement in maintaining the traditional form of the associated rituals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

liberty and loss

A

loss independent thought
parallels coudl be made with imperialism and empire - involkes sympaty
loss of history
some optimism
helvidius priscus trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

loss indpent thought

A

 Tacitus first book annals- none of the ‘old sound morality’ lfet and ‘alll looked up to the comadns of a soverign
 Lack independent thought extended to the wide public, due to few being ‘left who had seen the republic ‘

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
annals loss liberty
Annals 3.52- if return to republic owuldnt be able to cope- anarchy and disorder- as people wont learn what is right and wrong without being told explicity
26
paralelesl of liberty w imeprialism
 Britons- sgricola- ‘roken to obedience’  And above
27
loss of history
- book burnings other historians cremitus cordus
28
public bok burnings
of the ‘eulogies written by rusticus and sencio on paetus and priscus’ * Threat to pursuit of history esp concerneing as raises issue factually inccorect collective memory- rela pribem under a principate rather a republic- lack of idcussion and accountability * Forum- freedom of speech arena * ‘they fancied.. that in that fire the voice of the roman people, the freedom of the senate and the conscience of human race were perishing ‘
29
other historians loss of history
 Historian described the reigns of principates ‘during their lifetimes in fictitious terms’- feared what happen to them
30
cremitus cordus
forced into suiscide due to his overly positive perspective on tyrannicides- cassius and brutus
31
some optimism
 Tacitus stays quiet about nerva and trajan- iff to critic and give ‘oppp fro free speech and thought
32
helvidius priscus trial
 Juxtaposes Lepidus (defending Priscus) and Tiberius. Priscus is a poet who made an impudent remark.  Priscus is executed, showing the bankruptcy of Tiberius’ claims to justice and moderation.
33
imperialism and libebrty0 invokes sympathy
- boudica speach britain disease calgacus speech gauls
34
boudicca speech
Boudicca speech and the anonymous speech preceding it are powerful.  - Agricola 21: “the simple natives call it civilisation, when in reality it was part of their enslavement.
35
starry night predestination
occurs during the dramatic and infamous murder plot against Agrippina the Younger, Nero’s mother. Nero arranges for her to be killed in a staged shipwreck off the coast of Baiae. However, the calm sea and clear night expose the plan when the mechanism fails.
36
boudicca speec hsignif
acitus’ double rhetoric: He sets up an opposition between the disciplined, honour-bound Roman military ideal and Boudicca’s appeal to justice, honour, and ancestral liberty. Boudicca’s speech: She speaks in the voice of a woman, a mother, and a queen wronged by Roman power — referencing the rape of her daughters and the plundering of Britain. Powerful contrast: The Roman speaker emphasizes order and discipline, while Boudicca invokes freedom and outrage. The speeches reflect Tacitus’ ambivalence about empire: civilised power vs righteous rebellion.
37
roman attitude to liebrty
Tacitus reports Agricola himself as having said: it “would be advantageous even with regard to Britain, if Roman arms were everywhere and liberty were, so to speak, removed from sight.” (24.3)
38
calagus speech
Agr. 30–32) – "They make a desolation and call it peace" Ciceronian rhetoric: Tacitus’ rebel Calgacus speaks in polished, Roman oratory — a literary irony that raises questions about where true Roman values now reside. Moral inversion: Rome, the supposed bringer of peace, is the true aggressor, destroying to rule.
39
gauls liberty
The Gauls are said to have lost their courage when they lost their freedom (11.4); in the short account of Boudica’s revolt, the Britons discuss the evils of slavery (15.1) and they seek inspiration from German successes in this regard (15.3) ecurring idea: that liberty nourishes virtue, while empire breeds decadence and decline. This is true not only of the conquered — but of the conquerors. liberty lacking= lack confidence
40
disease semantic field
 Batomsky and Levan. Levan considers the semantic field of disease which lingers around imperialism: “regained consciousness”, “remedies”, “pure contagion of mastery”, “unimpaired and unconquered.” 
41
tacitus republican
- historical context cicero \tacitus moerig the loss of republican ideas not republic observations and qyotes
42
tacitus historicla context republic
republic wasn’t a democracy, closest had was tribune of plebs who rep peole of rome
43
cicero republic
 Cicero- republic is thing belongs to people- cohesion between orme and citizens  Whilst everyone must be in agreement what right and wht is just – most not actively involved in politics
44
tacitus quotes on republic
o Notes how the nobles “preferred the safety of the present to the dangerous past.” o “deranged by violence, intrigue and finally corruption.” o the rivalries of factions, the avarice of magistrates, the impotence of laws”
45
why nobles prefer present
comfortable succumbed to it chose submission because it was easier than risking their lives for liberty. Periodisation: This is a key line for understanding the post-Republic transition. The Republic = “dangerous”; the Empire = “safe” (but also morally dead). Useful theme: The complicity of the nobility in tyranny. Freedom wasn’t just lost; it was relinquished.
46
collapse of imperial institutions
Breakdown of Republican norms: Factions (factio) suggest elite self-interest and political tribalism. Avarice of magistrates = greed hollowed out magistracies as public service. Laws had no power = legal forms remained but lost moral and civic force. Modern feel: This sounds eerily like a critique of modern political collapse — very quotable for essay openings or conclusions.
47
corruption legal system
libo drusus trial piso trial luxury
48
libo drusus trial context
Libo Drusus, a young nobleman, is accused of treason (maiestas) under Tiberius. The charges include consulting fortune-tellers, asking whether he would be wealthy enough to pave the Via Appia with silver, and writing fantastical omens. His “confession” is extracted under duress, and he commits suicide before sentencing. His property is seized and distributed among his accusers.
49
libo drusus trial quotes
nmoved countenance” ❞ (2.28) Tacitus describes Libo at the Senate with a passive expression — possibly from fear, perhaps from resignation. This moment becomes symbolic of the powerlessness of the individual under imperial power. acussers get his property =ourts become tools for personal enrichment and political elimination.
50
libbo trial tacitus opinon
* Tacitus heavily insinuates that he was not guilty; Marsh argues that he was.
51
piso trial context
Piso is accused of poisoning Germanicus, popular general and heir of Tiberius. His trial becomes a test of the Senate’s independence and the credibility of the Principate. - rumour that assinated not killed himself
52
senate attitude at piso trial
without pity, without anger… closed against any emotional appeal.” silenced, degraded elite under emperors.
53
rumour of piso
did not commit suicide but was assassinated so he could not implicate Tiberius in the death of Germanicus
54
augustus leadership
bribery loss of history corruption
55
augutsu bribery
e won over the soldiers with gifts” ❞ Tacitus on Augustus' rise — not with the people’s will, but through military bribery. This exposes the hollow foundation of the principate — built on manipulation, force, and appeasement of armed power, not civic legitimacy.
56
lack of colectve memory
he boldest spirits had fallen in battle... how few men were left who had seen the republic.” ❞ Part of Tacitus’ opening moral landscape. He paints the rise of Augustus not as necessary reform, but as the product of exhaustion, war, and loss.
57
augustus corruption
the higher a man’s rank, the more eager his hypocrisy.” ypocrisy becomes a social survival strategy, especially in public life (e.g., the Senate, the courts). Related figures: L. Piso (Ann. 3.10), Sejanus’ supporters (Ann. 4–6), or the flattery around Nero.
58
luxury as facet of corruption
pannonia mutiny parthoa embpus senators justify luxyr
59
pannonia mutiny
'craving luxury and ideleness Context: Germanicus is trying to restore order after soldiers in Pannonia mutiny, demanding better pay, less service time, and more privileges. Tacitus inserts this line as commentary on the soldiers’ moral state — they’re no longer motivated by duty (disciplina) or glory (virtus), but by comfort and ease.
60
parthain envoys
o 2.2 even the Parthian envoys are corrupted by Rome’s decadence. – given valuable gfifts= yet soon replaced by ashamed feeling of nat humiliation at having accepted from another world a king tained wit henemey customs
61
senators on own luxyry
self-righteously justify their luxury at 2.33.- ‘the only criterion of moderation or excess is the owners means’ , ‘senators and knights have special property qualifications..because their precedence in station rank and honours warrants special provision for their menatla dn physical well being
62
power t osenate
- power appears shared - senate silence and hortalus subsidy - tib and senate function - laissex- fiare? - provincial wives
63
power appears shared senate
Annals 1.11: “The consuls, the chiefs of the Senate, and the wisest experts on contemporary affairs were consulted.” - Tiberius presents himself as reviving Republican collegiality — consultation with the Senate, no divine honours, etc. - Tacitus uses this to frame Tiberius as disingenuous: power is centralised, but cloaked in the rhetoric of shared governance - predetermmed or guided by fear
63
recetion of tib speech
“The majority received his speech in silence” ❞ Tiberius delivers a speech against granting financial aid to the descendants of Hortensius. When this speech receives only nervous silence, he reverses course and offers 200,000 sesterces to each of Hortalus’ sons.
64
senate silence eval
ven when Tiberius opens debate, senators dare not respond — creating a culture of performative agreement. His reversal might seem like responsiveness, but Tacitus presents it as a sign of: Frustration at the Senate’s passivity Or a tactical display of generosity to reaffirm control Either way, it’s a parody of consultation.
65
functions within senate
Public and private business transacted within the Senate, enabling freedom of discussion among chief members.” ❞ (Annals 1.14) This claim early in the Annals sounds promising — a return to senatorial government. But the reality is grim: freedom of discussion is slowly replaced with obedient silence, especially after the maiestas trials begin to accelerate. Tacitus’ irony: the form of liberty survives, while its substance is gone.
66
tib steps back
– laissex-faire not intervening I grain crisis and rejecteinhg name ‘father of his county’- paradox of an indivd who helped to manufacgture an atmosphere of fear in rome * Removing himself fomr grain crisis and empire- opp expanding further * Yet- self preservation rather than opp discussion and coop?
67
denate on provincial wife
o Contrast republican and principate controlled rome in quality of senatorial discussion – on debate over govenors taking wives w them to provinces  Shutdown of debate by drusus limited discussion on issue pertaining to relaxation of military integrity  Marshall 2014 p 89- decline of senatorial integrity- giving up on debate allowing dursus halt it
68
declien of senate
- sycophans - tib attitude towards them - tib actions histories
69
seante sycophantic
pisa asking tiv in senate ‘will you vote first or last’ as concerned about voting against tib  Presents as children unsure what to think
69
tib attitude towards senate
exclaimed ‘men fit to be slaves’ – himself slave owner and thus had ability to do as wished not a vestige of the old, sound morality” remained as they “plunged into slavery”
69
tib actins
 Tiberius does not even need to justify the murder of Agrippa Posthumous.
69
gallus attitude towards senate
 Asinius Gallus: “single mind”
70
tyranny
opening lines domitian reign of terror shift of power sharing power removal of opps facilitated trials
70
histories senate
Book Four of the Histories, Regulus attacks the senate mercilessly, stating that the entire senate could be overturned by one voice (Hist. 4.42.4
70
tyrnany opening lines
rome from the beginning was ruled by kings’annals 1 1 opening lines  ‘power under the title of preceps
70
domitian reign of terro
* Saw ‘senate house under siege ‘ * Individ now simply watching for ‘imperial commands ‘ * Tacitus presents Agricola lucky due before * ‘maurius and rusticus’ suffering whilst * ‘we senators lef helvidius to prison’ – helvidius being phil and thus conflicting w Domitian repression of individ thougt and the arts
71
guilt tyranny
o Exhonerate guilt shared action * ‘stained ‘ ‘w senecios innocent blood ‘ o Innocent highlights awareness senator action not orally justified or acceptable 'we senators lef hlebidius to prison'
72
tyranny shift of power
 Away from oligarcy seen ‘when the senate was in power’ to one of fear wich ‘virtually been transformed into an autocracy * Virtually hesitance s
73
sharing pwoer/oligarchy
sejanus
74
removal of opp
agriocla germanicu clemens
75
facilitated tyranny
 Domitian reign of terror  Annals- ‘upper class survivors’ finding that ‘slavish obedience was the way to succeed’, those able to have a voice chose to conform in order to ebenfit themsleevs
76
tyrnany trials
libo drusus pirso priscus
77
change between roman republic and principate
o Pillars of republican life- damaged – freedom of speech, cb on ruler diminish  Freedom of speech * Decline of power of senate o Brutal repression opp figures o Quashing romes civil liberties o Thus in works – esp Agricola, tacitus mourns loss of republic
78
aristocratic/noble fmailies/tryanny
o Rome adoption useful mechanism which looked to consolidate power in a smal group o Tib adopted by augusts given ‘civil and military authjirty ‘ and ‘the powers of the truben’ o Augustus adopted Agrippa sons gaius and Lucias casear and had ‘consulshops reserved for them’ o Noble families have earmarked power
79
aristocrac families contemp historians
sallust livy
80
sallust- contemp historians
conspiracy of catiline pointing to ‘the narrowness of the oligarchic clique which monopolises power’- largely dictated by ‘birth’ resulting in corruption of country
81
livy corruption small families
raises issue of ‘supreme exec posts’ oly open yto patricians ‘
82