MAPPA and Potentially Dangerous Offenders Flashcards
(21 cards)
What does MAPPA stand for
Multi-agency public protection arrangements
What is the purpose of MAPPA
Manage risk of most serious sexual, violent and terrorist offenders
Reduce re-offending behaviour to protect the public from serious harm
What is the MAPPA population
93,436
The responsibilites of MAPPA
Identify all relevant offenders
Complete comprehensive risk assessments
Devise, implement and review robust risk assessment plans
Focus available resources to best protect the public from serious harm
Lead Agency
Probation service - 18+
The YOT - children
Mental health/learning disabilisty services
The Police
Responsible authorities in MAPPA
Probation service
Police Force
Prison Service
What is the purpose of the Duty to Co-operate
co-ordinate the involvement of different agencies in assessing and managing risk
MAPPA category 1
registered sex offenders
MAPPA category 2
Violent and other sex offenders
MAPPA Category 3
Other dangerous offenders who require active multi-agency management
MAPPA category 4
Terrorist or terrorist risk offender
How many MAPPA Levels are there
3
MAPPA Level 1
Multi-agency support with information sharing for risk management
MAPPA Level 2
Formal multi-agency meetings, active involvement from more than one agency in managing individual
MAPPA Level 3
Formal multi-agency meetings with senior representation for few who pose highest risk
what does CPPC stand for?
Critical public protection case
What is effective mappa practice
accurate identification
communication and partnership between agencies
protective integration
professional curiosity
defensible decisions
Definition of Risk of Serious Harm
The risk of serious harm is the likelihood of a life-threatening and/or traumatic event. Recovery can be expected to be difficult or impossible
Risk of Serious Harm Summary
Who is at risk?
what is nature of risk
what is level of risk
what is likely to increase/decrease risk
Challenges in risk assessment
access and availability of information
assessor bias
Conflict and assimilation of agency core values and priorities
4 pillars of risk management
supervision, monitoring and control, interventions and treatment, victim safety