Minority Influence Flashcards

(81 cards)

1
Q

Minority influence refers to…

A

situations where one person or a small group of people (i.e. a minority) influences the beliefs and behaviour of other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is minority influence distinct from conformity?

A

Conformity is when the majority is doing the influencing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conformity is sometimes called…

A

majority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

True/False: In minority influence and conformity the people being influenced may just be one person, a small group or a large group of people

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Minority influence is most likely to lead to what type of conformity?

A

Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Internalisation

A

Both public behaviour and private beliefs are changed in the process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the name of Moscovici’s study?

A

‘Blue slide, green slide’ study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

True/False: Moscovici studied majority influence

A

False: Minority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In his study, Moscovici asked a group of how many people to view a set of 36 blue-coloured slides?

A

six

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In Moscovici’s study, what were the group of six people asked to do?

A

View a set of 36 blue-coloured slides that varied in intensity and then state whether the slides were blue or green

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In Moscovici’s study, participants were asked to view a set of how many blue-coloured slides that varied in intensity?

A

36

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In the first two groups in Moscovici’s study there were how many confederates?

A

2

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In Moscovici’s study, what did the confederates do in the first group?

A

Consistently said that the slides were green

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In Moscovici’s study, true participants gave the same wrong answer (green) on 8.42% of the trials under which condition?

A

Group 1 - two confederates consistently said that the slides were green

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In Moscovici’s study, why did participants say the slides were green on 8.42% of the trials when there were two confederates?

A

They agreed with the confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In Moscovici’s study, true participants gave the same wrong answer (green) on what percentage of the trials when there were two confederates who consistently said the slides were green?

A

8.42%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

In Moscovici’s study, what was the difference between the confederates in the first group and second group?

A

The first group were a consistent minority and said the same wrong answer, whereas the second group were an inconsistent minority and said blue 1/3 of times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The second group in Moscovici’s study were exposed to a consistent/inconsistent minority

A

inconsistent minority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

In Moscovici’s study, the second condition included confederates saying ‘blue’ __% of the time

A

33

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

When confederates in Moscovici’s study said blue 33% of the time and were an inconsistent minority, what did agreement with the answer ‘green’ fall to?

A

1.25%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

In Moscovici’s study, true participants gave the same wrong answer (green) on 1.25% of the trials under which condition?

A

Group 2 - two confederates inconsistently said that the slides were green 2/3 of the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What was different about the third group in Moscovici’s study?

A

There were no confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What was the effect of having no confederates in Moscovici’s study compared to the groups with confederates?

A

Participants got the answer wrong on just 0.25% of the trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What did Moscovici’s study alongside other research draw attention to?

A

Three main processes in minority influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What are the three main processes in minority influence?
Consistency, commitment and flexibility
26
Why must minorities be consistent in their views?
Over time, this consistency increases the amount of interest from other people
27
Synchronic consistency
Agreement between people in the minority group - everyone is saying the same thing
28
If there is agreement between people in a minority group and everyone is saying the same thing, what is this called?
Synchronic consistency
29
Diachronic consistency
Consistency over time - the minority have been saying the same thing for a long duration of time
30
If a minority have been consistent in what they are saying over a long time, what is this called?
Diachronic consistency
31
A consistent majority makes other people start to...
rethink their own views
32
'Maybe they've got a point if they all think this way?' is an example of a majority making other people start to rethink their own views through what?
Synchronic consistency
33
'Maybe they've got a point if they have kept saying it?' is an example of a majority making other people start to rethink their own views through what?
Diachronic consistency
34
Give an example of research evidence demonstrating the importance of consistency
Moscovici et al.'s blue/green slide study
35
What did Moscovici et al.'s blue/green slide study show about consistency?
A consistent minority opinion had a greater effect on changing the views of other people than an inconsistent opinion
36
What did Wood et al. do in relation to Moscovici's minority influence study?
Carried out a meta-analysis of almost 100 similar studies
37
What did Wood et al. find when carrying out a meta-analysis of almost 100 similar studies to Moscovici's?
Minorities who were seen as being consistent were most influential
38
The fact that Wood et al. found that minorities who were seen as being consistent were most influential suggests that...
presenting a consistent view is a minimum requirement for a minority trying to influence majority
39
One weakness of Moscovici et al.'s blue/green slide study is that it was just as __________ as Asch's line judgement task
artificial
40
The criticism that Moscovici et al.'s blue/green slide study is artificial means that research is therefore...
far removed from how minorities attempt to change the behaviour of majorities in real life
41
In cases such as jury decision-making and political campaigning, the outcomes are vastly more/less important than demonstrated in Moscovici's study
more
42
In jury decision-making and political campaigning the outcomes are vastly more important than Moscovici's blue/green slide study. This means findings of minority influence studies are...
lacking in external validity and are limited in what they can tell us about how minority influence works in real-world situations
43
The criticism that Moscovici et al.'s blue/green slide study is artificial means that research is therefore lacking in what type of validity?
external
44
What is the difference between Moscovici et al.'s study and cases such as jury decision-making and political campaigning?
The outcomes of jury decision-making and political campaigning are vastly more important - sometimes literally a matter of life or death
45
Some minorities engage in quite extreme activities to draw attention to and show __________ to their views
commitment
46
When minorities engage in extreme activities to draw attention to their views, what does carrying out extreme activities with some risk show?
Greater commitment
47
If a minority engage in extreme activities that present risk to show greater commitment to their cause or views, the majority group are likely to pay more/less _________
more attention
48
'Wow, she must really believe in what she's saying so perhaps I ought to consider her view' is an example of what?
A minority showing commitment - augmentation principle
49
Augmentation principle
A committed minority showing their commitment for example through risking themselves for their cause having an effect on the majority - the majority value the importance of the cause as the minority are risking their lives for it.
50
What did Nemeth argue in relation to minority influence?
Consistency is not the only important factor in minority influence because it can be off-putting
51
Why did Nemeth argue that consistency is not the only important factor in minority influence?
It can be off-putting
52
Nemeth argued that someone who is extremely consistent, who simply repeats the same old arguments and behaviours again may be seen as...
rigid, unbending and dogmatic
53
Nemeth argued that consistency on its own is unlikely to gain many...
converts to the minority position
54
Nemeth argued that members of the minority ned to be prepared to do what?
Adapt their point of view and accept reasonable and valid counterarguments
55
Nemeth argued that the key to minority influence is to strike a balance between what?
Consistency and flexibility
56
Consistency, commitment and flexibility all make people think about what?
The minority's view or cause
57
Hearing something you already agree with usually/doesn't usually make you stop and think
doesn't usually
58
If you hear something new, you may think more deeply about it, especially if the source of the other view is...
consistent, committed and flexible
59
If you hear something new, you may think more deeply about it. It is this deeper processing which is important in...
the process of conversion to a different, minority viewpoint
60
The more that increasing numbers of people switch from the majority position to the minority position, the faster the rate of...
conversion
61
If someone switches from the majority position to the minority position, they have become what?
converted
62
Snowball effect
Over time increasing numbers of people switching from the majority position to the minority position. Gradually the minodity view has become the majority view and change has occurred
63
If the minority view gradually becomes the majority view and change occurs, what is this called?
The snowball effect
64
Who carried out research and found evidence showing that a change in the majority's position does involve deeper processing of the minority's ideas?
Martin et al.
65
What did Martin et al. do?
Present a message supporting a particular viewpoint and measured participants' agreement
66
Martin et al. presented a message supporting a particular viewpoint and measured what?
Participant's agreement
67
In Martin et al.'s study, what was the difference between the two groups?
One group of participants heard a minority group agree with the initial view, while another group heard a majority group agree with it
68
After participants in Martin et al.'s study had heard the minority or majority group agree with the initial view, they were finally exposed to...
a conflicting view
69
After participants in Martin et al.'s study had heard the minority or majority group agree with the initial view, they were finally exposed to a conflicting view and...
attitudes were measured again
70
What did Martin et al. find?
People were less willing to change their opinions if they had listened to a minority group than if they had listened to a majority group
71
Martin et al. found that people were less willing to change their opinions if they had listened to which type of group compared to the other?
Minority
72
Martin et al.'s findings suggest that...
the minority message had been more deeply processed and had a more enduring effect, supporting the central argument about how minority works
73
Martin et al.'s findings support the central argument about...
how minority works
74
Martin et al.'s research makes clear distinctions between,,,
the majority and the minority
75
The fact that Martin et al.'s experiment was done in a controlled way is a strength/weakness of minority influence research
strength
76
One criticism of Martin et al.'s study is that real-world social influence situations are much more ___________
complicated
77
Minorities/majorities usually have a lot more power and status that majorities/minorities
Majorities, minorities
78
Why do minorities have to be very committed to their causes?
They have to be because they often face very hostile opposition
79
Factors such as majorities having a lot more power and being hostile towards minorities are usually present/absent in minority influence research
absent
80
How are factors such as majorities having a lot more power and being hostile towards minorities usually absent in minority influence research?
The minority is simply the smallest group
81
Why is the absence of factors such as majorities having a lot more power and being hostile towards minorities a limitation of Martin et al.'s findings?
Martin et al.'s findings are very limited about what they can tell us about minority influence in real-world situations