Module 4 - Wittgenstein's Attack on the Referential Theory of Meaning Flashcards
(35 cards)
(…) as meaning is merely secondary to (…) as meaning
Sense; referent
(…) was a philosophical movement which aimed to eliminate of all (…)
Positivism; metaphysics
Traditional metaphysical (…) are generally not found in the language (or discourse) of (…)
terms; science
The opposition between (…) and (…) is one of the outstanding dialects in philosophy
science; religion
The (…) theorists, in general, take the side of science in this dialectic
referential
Wittgenstein commenced his attack against the referential theory of meaning by presenting two erstwhile singular names (…) and (…)
Excalibur; Mr. N.N.
The weakness of Wittgenstein’s attack is that the two erstwhile singular names by which he commenced the attack against the referential theory of meaning are both of them in (…) failure
referential
The two alleged singular names (…) and (…) do not have respective (…) to start with
Excalibur; Mr. N.N.; referents
In his objectlevel attack against the referential theory of meaning, Wittgenstein confronts the reader with the problem of (…) reference to past objects
contemporaneous
In his metalevel attack against the referential theory of meaning, Wittgenstein confronts the reader with the alleged (… …) of alluding to (…) being broken to pieces and the alleged (… …) of alluding to (…) being dead
singular name; meaning; singular name; meaning
Sense (i.e. descriptive meaningfulness) of a linguistic expression is ultimately vacuous or empty unless there is something,, a referent object, which the linguistic expression describes
TRUE
Reference (i.e. referential meaningfulness) of an erstwhile singular name is not attained unless the alleged singular name has a referent object
TRUE
The term ‘flying horse’ has sense
FALSE
The term ‘flying horse’ has a referent
FALSE
An alleged name is ultimately not a name unless it has a definitive referent
TRUE
All erstwhile (alleged) names have definitive referents
FALSE
Wittgenstein’s counterexample ‘Excalibur’ has a definitive referent
FALSE
Wittgenstein’s counterexample ‘Mr. N.N.’ has a definitive referent
FALSE
That according to the referential theory of meaning referent objects are meanings is Wittgenstein’s original discovery
TRUE
However, Wittgenstein finds it absurd to talk of referent objects as meanings
TRUE
That referent objects are meanings is the ultimate essential consequence of the referential theory of meaning
TRUE
Wittgenstein does not consider his discovery of this consequence absurd
TRUE
Contemporaneous reference to past objects is very much possible
FALSE
Contemporaneous reference to present objects is very much doable
TRUE