Module 7 - On Definitions Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

A (…) is a horse with a single tusk on its forehead

A

unicorn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The word (…) means a horse with a single tusk on its forehead

A

‘unicorn’
*notice the ‘…’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A (…) is a geometrical figure which is both a square and a circle

A

square-circle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The word (…) means geometrical figure which is both a square and a circle

A

‘square-circle’
*notice the ‘…’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In a (…) definition, it is so to say a thing which is defined

A

real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In a (…) definition, it is a word or a linguistic expression which is defined; hence, such a definition is said to be (…)

A

nominal; nominal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(…) and (…) are the two essential elements of a definition

A

Definiendum; definiens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The linguistic expression ‘a horse with a single tusk on its forehead’ has (…) meaning but no (…) meaning

A

intentional; extensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Similarly, the linguistic expression ‘a geometrical figure which is both a square and a circle’ has (…) meaning but no (…) meaning

A

intensional; extensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

For a realist, it is (…) meaning, not (…) meaning, which culminates meaningfulness

A

extensional; intensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ordinary-language thinkers understand (…) meaning more easily than (…) meaning

A

intensional; extensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Logical (critical) thinkers distinguish sharply between (…) versus (…) meaning

A

extensional; intensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The word (…) is the supreme example of a word which lacks both (…) and (…) meanings but has a use as a term

A

‘nothing’; extensional; intensional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The French philosopher Rene Descartes is famous for his method of (… …)

A

methodic doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The philosophic problem of negative existensials must be deemed a stumbling block of both (…) and (…)

A

religion; science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

With the problem of negative existensials unsolved, the atheist thesis that God does not exist cannot be proven True; accordingly (… …) has no motivation to solve the problem

A

ordinary religious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

But the same problem unsolved makes it impossible from the great Saint (…) to deny the existence of Lucifer (the Devil) which is presumably part of what he wanted to deny in arguing the evil does not exist

A

Augustine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Vulcan does not exist, but even as this believed in (…), it cannot be proven True dues to the philosophic problem of negative existentials

A

mythology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

In (…), the problem of negative existentials has to be solved independently of both science and religion

A

philosophy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

A decisive solution to the problem of negative existentials would constitute a tremendous advance in pure (…)

A

philosophical analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

In a definition, the definiens is the meaning of the definiendum

21
Q

Any definition is specifically intended to be persuasive

22
Q

You are the extensional meaning of your name

23
Q

You are the intensional meaning of your name

24
The scientific emphasizes the distinction between reality and fiction; the religious de-emphasizes such distinction
TRUE
25
The typical religious would agree with Meinong and Wittgenstein
TRUE
26
Any (supposed) subject of any sentence exists
FALSE
27
Religion believes that both God and the Devil exist
TRUE
28
Science believes that neither God nor the Devil exists
TRUE
29
Like a typical religious, the otherwise excellent doubter Descartes believed both God and the Devil
TRUE
30
Saint Augustine was correct in arguing that evil does not exist
FALSE
31
Saint Augustine successfully solved the problem of evil, the heaviest problem of philosophy of religion, by denying the existence of evil
FALSE
32
For the religion, suffering purifies the soul
TRUE
33
Hence, for the religious, any person must be willing to suffer
TRUE
34
Some people believe they can be happy by being ignorant
TRUE
35
Science addresses the problem of pain (as an evil) by denying a la Augustine the existence of evil (which of course includes pain)
TRUE
36
The definition ‘A unicorn is a horse with a single tusk on its forehead’ is a real definition
TRUE
37
In contrast, the definition “The word ‘unicorn’ means a horse with a single tusk on its forehead” is a nominal definition
TRUE
38
Unicorns are not real, i.e. unicorns do not exist
TRUE
39
It is clearly correct to say ‘A unicorn is really a horse with a single tusk on its forehead’ following the so-called real definition of the definiendum ‘unicorn’
TRUE
40
The word ‘unicorn’ extensionally means a horse with a single tusk on its forehead
TRUE
41
The word ‘unicorn’ intensionally means the same as ‘horse with a single tusk on its forehead’
FALSE
42
The word ‘nothing’ which is undeniably both extensionally and intensionally meaningless must be deemed incapable of any real definition
TRUE
43
You can do ostensive definition of the term ‘nothing’
FALSE
44
The word ‘nothing’ can be provided only a nominal definition
TRUE
45
The previous exercise item comprises the point of Ockham why he says that non-existents can be given only nominal definition
TRUE
46
The word ‘nothing’ means an x which is not itself (i.e. x≠x) or an x which does not exist [i.e. ~(∃y)(x=y)]
TRUE
47
In symbolic logic, the word ‘nothing’ is signified by the denied existential quantifier
TRUE
48
In symbolic logic, the expression ‘s is nothing’ is equivalent to either the expression ‘x is not itself’ (i.e. x≠x) or the expression ‘x does not exist’ [i.e. ~(∃y)(x=y)]
TRUE
49
So finally, a nothing is a non-existent and a non-existent is a nothing
TRUE