New Readings Flashcards
(74 cards)
Why did Syrians initially not want union with Iraq?
Iraq was closely linked to the British, they felt they would be regarded as sympathisers of imperialists and against Arab unity.
Why did Nasser initially rejected union with Syria?
Felt that Syria needed to find internal unity first and that another 5 years was needed.
Result of the UAR elections in Syria
Ba’th were largely defeated, won 250 of 9,445 seats. Were defeated by conservative coalitions who capitalised on issues of unity with Egypt.
Qasim’s leadership style and relationship with Nasser.
Unconventional, didn’t co-operate with Arab unity or pay Nasser respect. Made himself open enemy of Nasser’s regime. Showed signs of mass appeal and threatened Egyptian-Syrian union.
Why were the Ba’th not associated from seccession with the UAR?
They had left before the secession and played no clear role. Was a split in the party, some who blamed Nasser and others who were still allied with him.
1963 Iraqi coup
Oeverthrew Qasim and brought Ba’th to power, was celebrated by the Egyptians. Nasser now eager to co-operate with Iraqi regime.
1963 unity talks
Talks aiming to develop a three way, Syrian-Egyptian-Iraqi union, personal discussions between Nasser and leading Ba’thists on failure of 1958-61 union.
Nasser’s relationship with Ba’th in 1963
Was sceptical of them because of their breakaway from UAR. Would not unite at their convenience, felt it was their role to come to him, he wanted to wait until they had clear leadership.
Nasser’s proposal of the formation of new union.
Would initially just be Egypt and Syria for trial period, then Iraq to join as third partner.
Why could Syria and Iraq not unite without Egypt?
Egypt regarded as focal point of Arab nationalism.
Nasser’s worry about union with Iraq and Syria
That he would be outnumbered by two Ba’th forces and would lose all control.
How did Syrian-Iraqi-Egyptian negotiations end?
With agreement to postpone implementation of unity for over two years.
Why was union never going to happen.
Nasser had claimed he would unite with Syria but not with the Ba’th, this was unacceptable to the Syrians.
Arab states feuding in 1963.
Syria with Egypt, Iraq, Jordan and Morocco.
Egypt with Syria, Saudi Arabia, Jordan.
Algeria with Morocco and Tunisia.
Only Arab League countries with good relations with everyone in 1963
Kuwait, Sudan and Libya
The blocs of Arab League quarrels
Revolutionary regimes (Egypt, Algeria, Iraq, Yemen and Syria) against conservative/moderates.
Era of Arab reconciliation
From 1963-66, positive developments like co-ordinated policy towards Israel, negotiations around Yemen and decline in inter-Arab name calling.
Kerr’s view of Arab position on Israel
When the Arabs are in a co-operative mood opposition to Israel tends to find expression in agreement to avoid action on Palestine but when they quarrel it becomes subject of dispute.
Challenge of the PLO to Jordan and Egypt
If it amounted to anything would challenge Jordanian sovereignty. Nasser wanted to preserve detente with Jordan but also wanted to be seen as champion of Palestine.
Events leading to Suez
- War of liberation in the canal zone that was ended by 1954 treaty
- Refusal of revolutionary regime to enter foreign pacts except the Arab League
- Rejection by Nasser of unjust solution to Arab-Israeli conflict
- 1955 Czech arms deal (Kerr holds was the main cause)
- Nationalisation of Suez Canal Company
- Triple aggression of Britain, France and Israel.
Suez’s affects on Arab relations with great powers.
Confirmed, magnified and strengthened existing trends.
How many Kurds were exiled in Syria from 1961-2011?
Roughly 150,000
What role did Absolute Arabism play in Syria?
Led to a view that Syria was in a constant state of war with the ‘zionist enemy’. Any form of internal opposition framed as attempt to emasculate nation or collude with the enemy. It allows political opponents to be cast as unpatriotic, deprived them of protections.
What affect did Assad placing his family members in leading positions have on Syrian society?
Led to decline in academic freedom, independent political and cultural activities and the rule of law.