Numbers Flashcards

1
Q

What abilities are involved in numerical competence?

A
  1. Relative numerosity discrimination
    1. Concept of absolute number
    2. Ability to count
    3. Ability to do Arithmetic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Emmerton, Lohmann & Niemann (1997)

A

trained pigeons to discriminate between “few” (1/2 items) and “many (6/7 items)

cannot tell if its light and dark discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Relative numerosity discrimination

A

Ability to discriminate between sets of items on the basis of the relative number of items that they contain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Concept of absolute number

A

understanding that 4 bananas and 4 elephants have something in common…
… i.e. number is not intrinsically related to what you are counting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Matsuzawa (1985)

A

trained a chimp called Ai to select one of six response keys (labelled 1-6) when shown arrays of red pencils, with 1-6 pencils per array. She achieved more than 90% accuracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Problems and solution to Matsuzawa (1985)

A
  • But this is not necessarily the same as counting…
  • Animals could be learning about specific perceptual pattern
    • Perceptual matching
      ○ .. although Ai could transfer her ability to arrays of items other than pencils

Matsuzawa argued no: Ai could transfer her ability to arrays of different types of item

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Meck and Church (1983): Serial presentation

A
  • Rats trained with two signals, of 2 or 8 pulses of white noise.
  • 2 pulses –> reward for responding on the left lever
  • 8 pulses –> reward for responding on the right lever:
  • Solved task; but were animals responding on basis of total time, rather than number of pulses?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Davis & Bradford (1986)

A
  • Access to a plank with food pellets on it
  • Experimenter nearby talking to rat
  • Each rat had designated number of pellets to eat – if he ate more the experimenter shouted “No!” or clapped loudly.
  • When they ate the right number or fewer than the target they were rewarded by “praise and petting” (and also a little more food)
  • got it right even when no longer rewarded for correct responses
    transferred to sunflower seeds
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Meck and Church (1983) follow up

A
  • To investigate this, they devised a test in which both stimuli lasted 4 seconds
  • If the animals were responding on the basis of stimulus duration, this is impossible; but they continued to respond correctly.
  • Rats also tested with pulses of light – and continued to respond appropriately
  • This is more evidence against perceptual matching
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gelman & Gallistel (1978)

A

argued that counting involves mapping numerosity (the number in the display – e.g. two items) onto a label that represents that numerosity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The process of counting involves three principles:
according to German & Gallistel (1978)

A

i) one-to-one principle: each item is assigned only one numeron

ii) stable-order principle: numerons must always be assigned in the same order

iii) cardinal principle: the final numeron assigned applies to the whole display

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Representation of number in chimp? Biro & Matsuzawa 2000

A

Ai trained to touch arabic numerals in ascending order

  • Or is it just rote learning of a particular stimulus-response sequence… – no requirement to know anything about the quantitative relation between numbers?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Brannon & Terrace, 2000

A
  • Chimps (Benedict, Rosencrantz & MacDuff) trained to order
  • arrays of 1-4 items in ascending, descending, or random order
  • They could learn ascending and descending orders, but not the arbitrary order 1-3-2-4
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Maths in the chimpanzee? Boysen & Berntson, 1989

A
  • A chimp called Sheba was trained to label arrays with counters, and then with arabic numerals:

In the final test a number of oranges were hidden in the lab, in any of three hiding places. Sheba had to find all the oranges, and then pick the arabic numeral that represented the sum of all the oranges that were hidden. After 12 training sessions (of around 20 trials per session) she was performing at about 85% correct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(Boysen & Bertson,1995)

A

chimp A was given a choice between two amounts of candy. Whichever chimp A chose was given to a second chimp, B, and chimp A got to eat the unchosen one.
- In chimp A’s interest to choose the smaller quantity, so it could eat the larger quantity. Completely unable to solve this task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

give an example of absolute number discrimination?

A

understanding that 4 and 5 are different things

17
Q

do animals have the ability to do relative numerosity discrimination, according to Emmerton, Lohmann & Riemann (1997)?

A

yes - pigeons able to discriminate between “few” (1/2 items) and “many” (6/7 items)

18
Q

what is a criticism of Emmerton, Lohmann & Riemann (1997) study into relative numerosity discrimination?

A

are the pigeons responding on the feature of the display (light = few, dark = many) and ignoring the number?

19
Q

in Emmerton, Lohmann & Riemann (1997) study into relative numerosity discrimination, when the spots were switched to light colours and the keys to dark colours, did this influence how the pigeons responded?

A

no - pigeons still responded the same as they had before, must be responding on the basis of the number of dots on the keys = must discriminate many vs few arrays

20
Q

do animals show a concept of an absolute number, according to Koehler?

A

yes - Jakob the raven could choose a pot with 5 spots from an array, even when size of spots varied 50-fold

21
Q

did Meck & Church (1983) provide evidence for or against perceptual matching?

A

against

22
Q

how many subjects were there in Brannon & Terrace (2000) study into the representation of number in the chimpanzee?

A

only 3 - not very reliable

23
Q

one-to-one principle

A

each item is only assigned one numeron

24
Q

stable-order principle

A

numerons must always be assigned in the same order

25
Q

cardinal principle

A

the final numeron assigned applies to the whole display i.e 5 means 5 numbers displayed if other 2 principles followed