performing with others

Question 1

part a- smith and smoll

Answer 1

effectiveness of cet on 34 little league baseball coaches, USA
field experiment
rang up and asked if wanted take part, all went to training session given verbal instructions, and a brochure to take with
all told to give praise, positive reinforcement and visual instructions
then observed after 2 week, all told improve postive reinforcement to 25%

boys in experimental condition enjoyed playing more, rated more coaches higher and rated relationship with teammates higher
improve from previous year in self esteem from control group, but decline in control

Question 2

issue with methodology

Answer 2

p1- ethnocentrism/ pop validtity
define
low pop validity, limited practical apps of cet may not work in collectivist culture, kids continue to not enjoy sport etc
BUT
minimise risk of individual diffs
so control ev
means more science, infer cause and effect etc., increased funding etc

p2-ecological
define
studying real leaders and how they acted
true representation of behaviour, generalide
more useful etc
BUT
low internal validity
observation
high risk of SDB

Question 3

performing with others section c

Answer 3

team sports awards
based on tuckmans research into development of group cohesion e.g adjourning

make cet compulsory
smith and smoll

Question 4

nature nurture smith and smoll

Answer 4

nurture- smith and smoll, training is environment
useful
but
determinism

nature- stogdill, characterisitcs of leader within you like decisiveness of judgement, speech fluency and interpersonal skills
scientific
but
reductionist

Question 5

stogdill

Answer 5

review of leadership
observed behaviour in group situatuins
found decisiveness of judgement, speech fluency and interpersonal skills were important as stable leadership qualties

Question 6

free will determinism performing withvothers

Answer 6

free will- choose to attend cet to improve performance
ethical
but
unscientific

determinism- stogdill , predetermined by persoanlity
useful
but
determinism

Question 7

reductionism holism performing with other

Answer 7

reductionism- smith and smoll
scientific
but
incomplete

holism- tuckmans development of group cohesion
includes forming, storming, norming, performing and adjouring
useful
but
determinism

Question 8

ethnocentrism performing with others

Answer 8

yes- smith and smoll westernised, america
low pop
but
no individual differences

no- stogdill, innate qualties
universal, so useful

yes- smith and smoll, westernised sport baseball

Question 9

ethics performing with others

Answer 9

smith and smoll- kids in control group will perform worse, so unethical
deters future pps
but
for greater good, useful

stogdill-ethical, pps was debriefed
improves reputation of psych as a science

smith and smoll- ethical through r2w
means can be replicated

Question 10

science performing with others

Answer 10

smith and smoll- standardised, all told improve pr to 25% etc
can replicated in other cultures, longitduinal etc

stogdill- subjective as was an observation
lowers internal validity, decreases chance of inter rater

smith and smoll- natural environment so low control
high ecological
but
less control over situational factors

Question 11

usefulness performing with others

Answer 11

smith and smoll- practical applications,
encourage cet, natural environment more realisitc
but
less control, lower internal validity

stogdill- less useful reductionist only considers nature
practical apps dont consider situational facotrs
but
scientific