Professional Practice Flashcards
includes research designs, sampling methods, EBP levels of evidence, ICF international classification, epidemiology, and standardized testing (59 cards)
norm-referenced
- always standardized
- compare individual performance to group standard
- compare persons that are same age, grade, etc.
- assess individual performance to the “norm”
criterion-referenced
- may or may not be standardized
- determines individual mastery of particular skills
- identify what a client can or cannot do
- no group performance comparison
standardized testing
standard set of procedures for administering/scoring (usually norm-referenced)
standard “z” score
how many standard deviations raw score is from the mean
percentile rank
percent of people scoring at or below a certain score
null hypothesis
no statistical difference/relationship between groups among variables
raw scores
actual scores earned
standard deviation
extent to which scores deviate from the mean or average score
validity
degree that an assessment measures what is supposed to measure
face
test looks like it assesses what it says it does
content
actual content assesses what it says it does
construct
measures a predetermined theoretical construct
criterion
established by external criteria
concurrent
degree to which new test correlates with an estimated test of known validity
predictive
accuracy in which a test predicts future performance on related task
reliability
consistency and stability in varying contexts
test-retest
stability across multiple administrations with same group
split-half
internal consistency of a test
rater reliability
intra-rater (same person), inter-rater (different person)
alternate form
multiple forms of test provide same results
between-subject designs
performances of separate groups of subjects are measured and comparisons are then made between the 2 groups
between-subject designs: subject randomization
each subject has equal probability of being assigned to either the experimental or control group
between-subject designs: subject matching
experimenter purposely attempts to match members of 2 groups based on all extraneous variables relevant to the experiment
within-subject designs
- performance of same group is compared in different conditions and/or in different situations
- sequencing effect may occur