Program Planning and Evaluation Flashcards
(27 cards)
Needs assessment
process of identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing the needs of a priority population
Features of a needs assessment
preset list of questions to be answered
predetermined sample of the number and types of people to answer the questions chosen in advance
data collected by personal interview, phone, written response, or existing data
results that are tabulated, summarized, distributed, discussed, ad used
How does the program planning process start?
with a needs assessment
When is a needs assessment not needed?
when there is absolutely no doubt what the most important needs in the group or community are; when it is urgent to act right now without delay, when a recent assessment has already been done and it is clear needs have not changed; and or when you feel the community would see an assessment as redundant or wasteful
vision
communicates what your organization believes are the most ideal conditions for your community
mission
describes what the group is going to do and why
obejectives
should answer the questions of who, what, ho much, and by when
Generalized Model
assess needs and capacities
goals and objectives
develop interventions
implement interventions
evaluate results
Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP)
Build CHI foundation
Tell community story
continuously improve the community
Intervention mapping steps
develop logic model
develop program outcomes and objectives
doing program design
producing the program
developing a program implementation plan
develop an evaluation plan
Strategy
a general plan of action that may encompass several activities and considers the characteristics of the priority population
method
systematic approach or procedures used by presenters, health educators, or speakers to share information, objectives, and lesson materials or can refer to a specific part of an intervention, lesson, or presentation
Examples of challenges to program implementation
funding, fidelity of implementation, staffing issues, communication problems, low participation
fidelity of implementation
the program is implemented as originally intended and according to the plan
SWOT analysis
Analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in order to identify existing community strengths or assets, identify weaknesses, and plan for opportunities and potential threats
Outcome evaluation
helps determine the costs and benefits of a program and can be the basis for choices when resources are limited; measures the long term effects of the intervention
Types of evaluation
formative
process
summative
Formative evaluation
assesses the context in which a program is developed and can include needs assessment or the development of components of a program. Encompasses research conducted that contributes to the design of the program. Program components or materials may be pilot tested.
Process evaluation
measures and describes the implementation of a program. Critical for understanding how and why a program works or does not work and can provide feedback on implementation, content, methods, participant, practitioner, and partner response
Summative evaluation
occurs after components of the program have been implemented and assesses the short term and long term intended consequences and effects of the program
Impact evaluation
examines the more immediate effects of the intervention such as changes in participant knowledge, attitudes, beliefs or behaviors
Empowerment evaluation
places community involvement and continuous learning at the forefront. It fosters self determination and the use of the evaluation for program improvement but there are concerns about maintaining standards of rigor and objectivity
developmental evaluation
accounts for the complexities and uncertainties related to program redesign or replication and the broader systems and circumstances surrounding programs
Breakthrough series model
used to structure and implement multisite or multiprogram learning collaboratives in which teams focus on shared goals but conduct small tests of change (plan, do, study, act cycles) in their respective programs to identify changes that are promising for scale up