PSY2001 S2 W3 Reducing Prejudice & Discimmination Flashcards
What is the Tri-component definitions of Prejudice?
Cognitive (belief about a group), Affective (strong feelings [usually negative] about a group), Conative (intentions to behave in certain ways towards the group)
What are the different types or levels of discrimination?
Indidividual and Institutional or Structural
What is Allport’s Contact Hypothesis?
1954
Under certain conditions, contact between groups will reduce prejudice
What are conditions promoting prejudice-reduction?
Equal status (in the interaction), Common goals, Intergroup cooperation, Institutional support (from authorities, laws, social norms).
Direct contact involves face-to-face interaction between members of different groups
Does direct intergroup contact reduce prejudice?
Empirical example
Meta-analysis: demonstrated that direct contact does reduce prejudice and greater reduction in prejudice are seen under the conditions specified by Allport, but these conditions are not essential for prejudice for prejudice reduction
Pettigrew & Tropp’s 2006
What are issues and critiques with Allport Contact hypothesis?
Allport didn’t clearly explain the potential mechanism involved in reducing prejudice in the contact hypothesis (how contact reduces prejudice)
What are mechanisms underlying how direct contact works?
Pettigrew & Tropp’s 2008 meta-analysis
- Reducing intergroup xiety ( anxiety about intergroup contact)
- Increasing empathy and perspective taking
- Increasing knowledge about the outgroup (though this was the weakest mediator)
Direct contact isn’t always possible or appropriate
What is an example of when direct contact isn’t always possible?
Northern Ireland, 1969 peace walls were built to separate catholic/Republican and protestant/loyalist communities in northern Ireland in order to reduce severe intergroup conflict and violence.
In 2022/2023: 92% of children in northern Ireland attend segregated schools
What indirect (not face-to-face) intergroup contact intervention were developed?
Vicarious contact, extended contact, imagined contact
What interventions are popular?
A third of all prejudice reduction studies evaluate interventions based on second-hand and imagined contact with outgroups
Paluck et al. 2020
What is vicarious contact?
observation of an interaction between ingroup and outgroup members
Can vicarious intergroup contact reduce prejudice?
Yes
Vittrup & Holden, 2011
Vezzali et al. 2015
What is extended contact?
knowing that ingroup members have contact with outgroup members
Can extended intergroup contact reduce prejudice?
Yes
Wright et al. 1997
Zhou et al. 2019
What did Vezzali et al. 2015 found on vicarious intergroup contact?
Exposure to passages from harry potter books, depicting intergroup friendship and intergroup prejudice predicted improved attitudes toward immigrants in children who identified more with harry potter
What did Vittrup & Holden (2011) found on vicarious intergroup contact?
Children exposed to racially diverse TV shows showed more positive outgroup attitudes than children not exposed to these shows.
What did Wright et al. 1997 found on extended intergroup contact?
White, Asian and African American undergraduate students who reported knowing more ingroup members with at least one outgroup friend reported less prejudice towards outgroups.
What did Zhou et al. 2019 found on extended intergroup contact?
Meta-analysis supports that there is a positive relationship between extended contact and intergroup attitudes
What is included in the mechanisms thought to drive the effects of extended contact on prejudice reduction ?
Reducing intergroup anxiety
Increasing empathy
Creating cognitive ‘overlap’ between the self and outgroup members
Changing perceptions of social norms
What are issues with extending vicarious contact ?
Can’t easily extended contact as an intervention. Difficult to deliberately manipulate whether someone frm your ingroups has outgroup friend, though vicarious contact is a little easier to manipulate.
What is imagined contact?
mental simulation of a social interaction with a member or members of an outgroup category
What is the basic experimental method for imagined contact?
1) Imagery Task: Imagine contact vs control
2) measure of prejudice: imagined intergroup contact can reduce pejudice
What mechanism underlie how imagined contact works?
Reduce intercrop anxiety
Increased trust in the outgroup
What studies showed that imagined intergroup contact can reduce
West et al. 2011: PPTs who imagined positive interaction with individual with schizophrenia, reported more positive attitudes than PTT who imagined positive interaction with someone without schizophrenia.
Miles & Crisp, 2014: meta-analysis supports effectiveness of imagined contact in promoting more positive attitudes, emotions, intentions and behaviours to a range of different groups