psychopanthology ao3 Flashcards
psychology paper 1 (33 cards)
failure to function adequately (label non standard lifestyles)
- may label non standard living as abnormal
- eg base jumpers have high mortality so risk to their life but its just their life choice
- or new age travellers dont work/no permanent home could be seen as not living adequately
- may label people wrong leading to restricted choice/ freedom
failure to function adequately (subjective criteria)
- idea of unconventional behaviour etc is all subjective
- psychiatrists may believe someone fits into criteria but others may disagree
- shows diagnosing is inconsistent and not reliable for case
- could lead to inaccurate diagnosis based on subjective ideas of whats normal and whats not
deviation from ideal mental health (imposed etic)
- definition was based off individualistic/western cultures
- other cultures independence not so important
- so if apply definition to other cultures it becomes imposed etic holding them to a standard thats not relevant to them
- leads to making inaccurate judgements of people from other cultures
deviation from ideal mental health (comprehensive criteria)
- it covers a range of criterias that we may seek help for
- means we can meaningfully discuss our mental health with a range of professionals
- eg psychiatrists look at symptoms or humanist looks at self actualisation
- allows us to assess ourselves and talk to different professionals but also acsess whats best for our MH
statistical infrequency (real life application)
- is used by psychiatrists eg less then 2% of population have IQ 70> this can be used to diagnose patients with IDD
- this is a positive as shows SIF is used in real life and not just a theoretical model
- can be used to identify severity of someones disorder and what help they need
- strength as important part of clinical treatments used by psychiatrists
statistical infrequency (ends of distrubution judged the same)
- SIF judges both ends as abnormal which may not be the case
- eg having a high IQ is very rare but isnt seen as abnormal but rather desirable and a good thing
- opposite for other end where intervention is required
- may misjudge people from ends as abnormal etc when isnt the case for everyone
- thats why it is not used alone when making diagnosis
deviation from social norms (it is useful)
- can be used in clinical pratice eg to find characteristics for antisocial personality disorder
- look at culturally abnormal behaviour like aggression etc
- compare to what the norm would do which wouldnt show aggression therefore these behaviours deviate
- shows definition holds value in psychiatry
deviation from social norms (imposed etic)
- social norms vary between cultures so it is culturally relative
- eg hearing voices in african cultures seen as normal talking to dead but in western cultures sign of SZ
- if we apply definition to other cultures becomes imposed etic
- issue as could lead to inaccurate judgement of someone esp those living in cultures where theyre not from
behavioural approach to explaining phobias/2 process model (practical application)
- approach has been used to develop therapies (SD and flooding)
- based of principle that if avoidance of phobic stimulus is prevented reinforcement cant occur so reducing fear
- SD and flooding have been effective therapies eg researchers found people less scared of spiders when going through SD than relaxation techniques
- therefore supports idea learn phobias via 2 process model as we can reverse learn successfully using it
behaviourist appraoch to explaining phobias/2 process model (environmentally reductionist)
- takes complex idea of explaining phobias to just learning from environment
- misses out other important factors
- take interactionist approach instead eg combine with cognitive
- strength as one factor can be studied can establish cause and effect and treat = adds to scientific credibility of approach in explaining
behaviourist approach to explaining phobias/2 process model (environmentally determinist)
- suggests learning will lead to phobia and that we have no free will in whether we develop phobia or not
- pessimistic view on behaviour
- strength as determinism aligns with science and adds scientific credibility
- because determinism establishes cause and effect which is a feature of science
behavioural approach to treating phobias - systematic desensitisation (it is effective)
- research support for it being effective researchers followed up 42 patients who has fear of spiders after 3 SD senssions
- had control group asw
- in both 3 and 33 months SD had less fear of spiders shows it is effective in both short and long term
- further backed up by comparing to control group and found high results
- adds scientific credibility to approach in treating phobias
behavioural approach to treating phobias - systematic densensitisation (accepted by patients)
- patients prefer SD over flooding as less traumatic experience and reflected by low refusal and drop out rates = positive
- shows patients more likley to finish and start SD which benefits NHS as not wasting money and it is actually helping people
- allows more people to get back to work so positive economic implications
behavioural approach to treating phobias - systematic densensitisation (environmental reductionist)
- takes complex idea of treating patientss with phobia to just counterconditioning
- misses out other important factors that should be treated eg cognitions like irrational thoughts
- take interactionist approach instead combine with cognitive so treat both behaviour and cognition
behavioural approach to treating phobias - flooding (cost effective)
- less sessions required and quicker alternative than SD
- so less money required to fund flooding so less strain on nhs and more money can be used in other sectors
- also as quick alternative means help more people and get them back into work so has positive implications on economy
behavioural apparoach to treating phobias - flooding (traumatic)
- one issue patients prefer SD over flooding as it is less traumatic
- not unethical as full consent given but high rates of dropping out treatment showing weakness
- also money spent has not been effective so nhs loses money and less people go back to work so negative implications on economy
behavioural approach to treating phobias - flooding (environmentally reductionist)
- takes complex idea of treating patientscogn with phobia to just counterconditioning
- misses out other important factors that should be treated eg cognitions like irrational thoughts
- take interactionist approach instead combine with cognitive so treat both behaviour and cognition
cognitive approach to explaining depression - becks negative triad (research support)
- researchers did study on 65 women on cognitive vulnerability and depression before and after pregnancy
- found women with high cognitive vulnerability more likley to develop post natal depression shows link
- gynocentric study and only pregnant women difficult to generalise if we generalise on men leads to beta bias
cognitive appraoch to explaining depression - becks negative triad (practical application)
- has practical application through CBT
- CBT basis is to challenge the negative triad and has been found to be effective in treating depression
- supports becks triad because we can change cognition to treat depression therefore showing cognition is an explanation of depression in the first place
cognitive approach to explaining depression - becks negative triad (cant explain all aspects of depression)
- doesnt explain all aspects of depression only basic symptoms but depression is very complex disorder
- cant explain symptoms like deep anger or hallucinations etc
- eg someone thinking that theyre a zombie
- so triad is limited
cognitive approach to explaining depression - ellis ABC model (partial explanation for depression)
- assumes that all depression start with an activating event
- doesnt provide explanation for endogenous depression (starts with an event hard to find)
- therefore model provides explanation for reactive depression but not other forms so it is limited
cognitive approach to explaining depression - ellis ABC model (practical application)
- has practical application through CBT
- CBT basis is to challenge the irrational beliefs and reduce symptoms = has been found to be effective in treating depression
- supports model because we can change cognition to treat depression therefore showing cognition is an explanation of depression in the first place
cognitive approach to explaining depression - ellis ABC model (ethical issues)
- ethically questionable as it almost entirely blames person for having depression
- unfair and could lead to more psychological harm than good
- however positive it has led to effective therapies and allow people to access the help they need
- cost benefit analysis even though does blame patient it helps them get better
CBT as a treatment for depression (it is effective)
- researchers tested CBT, drugs, CBT + drugs on depressed adolescents
- after 36 weeks 81% from CBT 81% drugs and 86% CBT + drugs had improved in depression
- shows CBT is effective but even more effective in combination
- good option to treat depression