Research Methods Evaluations-AS Only Flashcards

1
Q

Laboratory Experiments-Strengths

A
  • High control over extraneous -High external validity

- Can be replicated-increases validity of results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Laboratory Experiments-Weaknesses

A
  • Lacks Generalisations-Artificial environment/task
  • Participants may behave natural-demand characteristics and low external validity
  • Low mundane realism because of not everyday task
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Field Experiments-Strengths

A
  • High mundane realism-natural environment

- More valid and natural behaviour-high external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Field Experiment-Weaknesses

A
  • Extraneous variables are not controlled-difficult to see cause and effect
  • Can’t be fully replicated
  • Ethical issues as participants are not fully aware of participation-cannot consent-invasion of privacy?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Natural Experiments-Strengths

A
  • Provides research opportunities for studies that may not happen for ethical reasons
  • High external validity-looks at real life issues and problems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Natural Experiments-Weaknesses

A
  • Naturally occurring event may be rare-hard to generalise

- Participants may not be randomly allocated-Unsure if IV affected the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Quasi Experiments-Strengths

A
  • High control over extraneous -High external validity

- Can be replicated-increases validity of results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Quasi Experiments-Weaknesses

A

-Confounding Variables can occur-Cannot randomly allocate participants to conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Independent Groups Design-Strength

A
  • No order effects or Demand Characteristics

- Easy to allocate participants to groups-Uses Random Allocation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Independent Groups Design-Weaknesses

A
  • Chance that the groups are unbalanced-could have participant variables
  • Less economical-Two different sets of participants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Repeated Measures Design-Strengths

A
  • No participant variables-Same participants in both conditions
  • Economical-Only one set of participants are required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Repeated Measures Design-Weaknesses

A
  • Demand Characteristics-Partcipants might predict the aim of the study before the second condition
  • Order Effects-Experiment is done twice
  • Learning could occur
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Matched Pairs Design-Strength

A

No order effects-Partcipants only experience one condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Matched Pairs Design-Weaknesses

A
  • Partcipants might not be matched with 100% accuracy-Partcipant variables could still occur
  • Matching the participants is time consuming and costly-less economic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Random Sampling-Strength

A

-Free from researcher bias-The researcher cannot pick the participants for each condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Random Sampling-Weaknesses

A
  • Difficut and time consuming to fully randomize the participants
  • Chance of bias-Due to laws of probability
  • Partcipants could refuse to participate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Systematic Sampling-Strengths

A
  • Avoids researcher bias-follows a pattern

- Provides a fairly representative sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Systematic Sampling-Weaknesses

A
  • Partcipants could work out the pattern if it is not fully random
  • The participant could refuse to participate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Stratified Sampling- Strengths

A
  • Avoids researcher bias- They can’t choose the participants

- Provides a representative sample of the target population-Generalisation can occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Stratified Sampling-Weaknesses

A
  • Complete representation of the target population is not always possible due to individual differences
  • Partcipant could refuse to participate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Opportunity Sampling-Strength

A

-Quick and cheap to get participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Opportunity Sampling-Weaknessess

A
  • Unrepresentative sample-All participants come from the same area
  • Researcher bias-They choose the participants
  • Partcipants could refuse to participate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Volunteer Sample-Strengths

A

-Easy to get a sample- “They come to you”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Volunteer Sample-Weaknesses

A
  • Volunteer bias-a certain type of person may be attracted-affects generalisation
  • Partcipants may refuse to participate
25
Naturalistic Observation-Strength
-High ecological validity as behaviour occurs naturally in its natural environment-Easy to generalize
26
Naturalistic Observations-Weaknessess
- Hard to replicate-Lack of control | - Uncontrolled Extraneous Variables
27
Controlled Observations-Strengths
- Replicable- Highly controlled | - Extraneous Variables have little effect
28
Controlled Observation-Weakness
-Findings cannot be generalised
29
Covert Observation-Strength
-All natural behaviour is on show as the participants don't know that they are being observed-Increases the validity
30
Covert Observation-Weakness
-Ethical issues- Privacy and Consent
31
Overt Observation-Strength
-Less ethical issues-Partcipants know they are being observed
32
Overt Observation-Weakness
-As they know that they are being observed-Demand Characteristics and Non natural behaviour could occur
33
Structured Observation-Strengths
- Easy to record behaviour-Uses behavioural categories | - Produces Quantitative Data-Easy to analyse
34
Structured Observation-Weaknesses
-Less detailed results
35
Unstructured Observation-Strength
-Infomation is more detailed
36
Unstructured Observation-Weaknesses
- Provides qualitative data-harder to analyse | - High chance of observer bias-they pick behaviour to analyse-No behaviour categories
37
Event Sampling-Strength
-Useful when the event frequently occurs
38
Event Sampling-Weakness
-Observer may overlook details and behaviours if they are too complex
39
Time Sampling-Strength
-Reduces the number of investigations that have to occur
40
Time Sampling-Weakness
-An observed behaviour may unrepresentative of the investigation as a whole
41
Questionnaires-Strengths
- Cost effective - Can be completed without a researcher - Quantitative data produced-Easy to analyse and compare
42
Questionnaires-Weaknesses
- Social Desirability Bias-People could lie to be more socially desirable - Response Bias-A person could just tick the same box
43
Structured Interview-Strengths
- Straightforward and easy to replicate | - Data is easy to analyse
44
Structured Interview-Weaknesses
-Interviewer cannot deviate from the set of questions-this annoys and frustrates them
45
Unstructured Interview-Strength
-More flexibility-follow up questions can be asked
46
Unstructured Interview-Weaknesses
- Data is harder to analyse | - People may lie on their responses-Social desirability bias
47
Correlations-Strengths
- Can be used as a preliminary tool or as a starting point for research - Quick and economical - Can use secondary data
48
Correlations-Weaknesses
- Can only tell us how variables are related, but not why | - "Third-Variable Problem"-a untested variable affecting one or both co-variables
49
Qualitative Data-Strengths
- More detail | - More external validity- provides researchers with participants insight
50
Qualitative Data-Weaknesses
- Harder to analyse - Patterns can be hard to identify - Conclusions are based on subjective interpretation
51
Quantitative Data-Strengths
- Simple to analyse - Easy to find patterns - More objective
52
Quantitative Data-Weaknesses
- Narrower- less detail | - Fails to represent "real-life"
53
Primary Data-Strengths
- Obtained from the participants themselves | - Collected in multiple ways
54
Primary Data-Weakness
-Requires time and effort to produce data as experiment has to be done
55
Secondary Data-Strengths
- Inexpensive and quick to access | - Might be no need to conduct a study as data might be enough
56
Secondary Data-Weaknesse
-Large variation of quantity of secondary data- it could be out-dated or have many flaws
57
Peer Review-Strengths
- Established validity in the research | - Makes sure research is accurate
58
Peer Review-Weaknesses
- Anomity-Other can use it as a chance to get revenge on someone - Publication Bias- journals only publish works that they like- creates a false impression of the state of psychology - Burying ground-breaking research-they try to maintain the status-quo within certain areas