selection of participants Flashcards
(15 cards)
convenience sampling
method
participants who are easily accessible are selected
convenience sampling
strengths
the time and effort required to collect the sample is low compared to random and stratified sampling
-costs associated with gathering the sample are low
convenience sampling
limitations
-there may be a high level of researcher bias due to researcher subjectively select participants
-the sample is unliklely to be represenative of the population it was taken from
snowball sampling
method
- initial particpants are chosen
- each participant encourages other people to contact the researcher and join the sample
snowball sampling
strengths
-allows researchers to find a sample that may otherwise be difficult to recruit due to the nature of the study
-less time is needed for the researcher to gather a sample is reduced because initial participants recruit additional participants
snowball sampling
limitations
-sample is unlikely to be representative of the population it was taken from bs researcher are minimally invloved in participant recruitment
-the sample may be biased as only yhose who are in direct contact with the original participant can be recruited
random sampling
method
- names of all members in a population are collated
- names are randlomly selected by drawing them out of a hat or using computer generated program
random selection
strengths
-researcher bias is minimised
-each participant has an equal chance of being selected to be part of the sample
random selection
limitations
-time and effort required to conduct this type of sampling is high
-the sample is unlikely to representative of the population it was taken from if the sample size is not adequate
stratified sampling
method
1.the population is broken into subgroups based on characteristics relevant to the study
2.particpants from each subgroup are randmly selected in the same proportions they appear in the population
stratified sampling
strengths
-the sample is likely to be representative of the population it was taken from
-researcher bias is minimised
stratified sampling
limitations
-the time and effort required to conduct this type of sampling is high
-researcher may not always be able to classify each participant of the population in subgroups
random allocation
method
- names of participants in the sample are collated
- names are randomly selected by drawinf them out of a hat or using a computer generated program and assigned to groups
random allocation
strengths
-it can allow for good generalisability of results because equivalent groups are created
-prevents selection bias because each participant has an equal chance of being placed in the different conditions
random allocation
limitations
-it is not possible to use this form of allocation when the independent variable is not able to be manipulated by the reseacher
-while unbiased groups are created, equality of groups in relation to partipant characteristics is not guaranteed