Self as a Group Member Flashcards

(50 cards)

1
Q

Personal identities

A

self-aspects that make a person unique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social identities

A

self-aspects based on group membership

  • The more a person values a group, the more strongly they identify with it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Cognitive Processes in Social Identity Formation - Social categorization

A

People automatically categorize themselves and others into social groups
* E.g.race, ethnicity, gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cognitive Processes in Social Identity Formation - Social identification

A

Once people categorize themselves as part of a group, they adopt the identity of that group

  • Self-stereotyping: a person adopts the values and norms of the group
  • Creates an emotional bond with other in-group members
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cognitive Processes in Social Identity Formation - Social comparison

A

People make comparisons between groups and do so in a way that tends to be favourable to their in-group

  • In-group favouritism and out group bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

STUDY: Minimal Group Paradigm -

Participants are randomly and anonymously assigned to one of two groups on the basis of trivial criteria
* In a subsequent resource allocation task, participants tend to allocate….

A

allocate more resources to in-group members than out-group members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does this suggest?

A
  • People readily identify with a social group
  • Group categorization, even if based on meaningless criteria, tends to trigger in-group favouritism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The extent to which personal vs. social identities are salient depends
on

A

social context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Personal identity is more salient when interacting with

A

in-group members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Social identity/in-group identity is more salient when interacting with

A

out-group members, especially in an inter-group context

Leads people to think and behave in ways that are consistent with the norms of their in-group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Outgroup Homogeneity Effect

A

People tend to perceive out-group members as more similar to each other and in-group members as more diverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explained by the context shifts in the

A

salience of people’s identities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

People tend to behave more similarly to their

A

in-group in intergroup contexts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The other group perceives this similarity in behaviour and concludes that the rival group members are all

A

similar to each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why Do We Identify with Groups?
1. Evolutionary perspective:

A

In our evolutionary past, humans were in competition for resources so it was useful to form groups to increase safety and secure resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Implies that in-group favourtism is a result of

A

competition between groups for resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why Do We Identify with Groups?
2. Self-enhancement

A

Individuals gain personal self-esteem from associating with a successful/positive group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Leads to: Elevating the in-group over the out-group by focusing on

A

on positive qualities and achievements of the in-group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Devalue positive qualities and achievements of an

A

out-group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

STUDY: Basking in Reflected Glory - American university campuses RIVALS RESULTS

A
  • Students were more likely to wear clothing associated with their university if their university team won the football match
  • More likely to use first person pronouns (“we”) if the team won and more likely to use third person pronouns (“they”) if the team lost
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

To maintain strong self-esteem, people tend to closely associate themselves with a group when it is

A

successful and establish distance from a group when it fails

22
Q

Self-enhancement will generally motivate people to

A

maintain/gain status for their group

23
Q

Higher-status group members are motivated to maintain

24
Q

Lower-status group members are motivated to improve

25
How they accomplish this depends on the
permeability of group boundaries
26
Permeability of group boundaries
to what extent is it possible to change groups
27
If group boundaries are impermeable: Impermeability of group boundaries results in
strong identification with the group
28
Social creativity - Lower-status group members will
Modify their perception of their in-group’s standing * Adopt dimensions of comparison that emphasize the positivity of the in-group * e.g. Placing value on kindness and humor rather than money and power * Downward comparison with a different out-group in order to make the current standing of the in-group appear more positive
29
Social competition - Lower-status group members band together and
advocate for reducing the status difference between groups
30
If group boundaries are permeable: Individual mobility - Lower-status group members seek to individually transfer into the
higher-status group
31
individual will focus more on their personal identity and accomplishments and distance themselves from their
group membership
32
Token
When a high-status group takes in an individual member from a lower-status group
33
Being a token leads to
heightened awareness of how one is different from the group they’ve been accepted into
34
Consistent with
distinctiveness theory
35
Creates added performance pressure and can have
cognitive consequences
36
STUDY: How does being a token influence cognitive processing? RESULTS
Tokens had poorer memory for the interaction than non-tokens * Remembered fewer of the opinions that they had expressed and fewer of the opinions that others had expressed
37
Being a token may shift attention to
self-presentation concerns and away from the task at hand leading to disrupted cognitive processing
38
Implications for organizations: * Increasing the number of minority members in an organization should...
reduce their self- consciousness, decrease pressure, and improve cognitive processing
39
Why Do We Identify with Groups? - Uncertainty reduction
Individuals seek to gain certainty about themselves and the world
40
Identifying with a group accomplishes this goal by prescribing
group norms and offering a framework for how one should be and how to understand others
41
Prototype
in-group’s central characteristics, values, and norms for behaviour
42
Prototypical members
people that are most representative of the in-group prototype
43
Peripheral members
less typical of the in-group
44
Being a peripheral member of an important group leads to experiencing
self-uncertainty
45
Motivates greater conformity to in-group norms in order to become more
prototypical and gain greater self-certainty
46
STUDY: Prototypicality and Self-Certainty (French VS American average)
Peripheral participants experienced more self-uncertainty than prototypical participants This should motivate them to identify more with their in-group and behave in a more prototypical way
47
STUDY: Uncertain VS Certain + Protypical and Peripheral RESULTS
* For peripheral participants, high self-uncertainty led to more in-group bias, but self-certainty did not * For prototypical participants, self-uncertainty did not affect in-group bias
48
Sometimes peripheral members may identify with an important in- group more strongly than
prototypical members
49
This reasoning has been used to explain why extreme groups and behaviour are
attractive to some people
50
Extremist groups provide a certain, very clear, and prescriptive
direction for the self