Semantics Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Predicates

A

semantic category, distinct from syntactic categories like adjective etc.
picks out a set of objects with the property in question: a chair denotes the property of being a chair, happy denotes the property of being happy etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Referring Expressions

A

picks out a specific, salient individual (eg, proper names)

argument of the predicate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Individual

A

relates to any object you wish to refer to (yourself, your feet, the chair you’re sitting on)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Proposition

A

combine a subject (referring expression) with a predicate to yield a proposition
roughly, a sentence meaning
can be true or false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is/was

A

syntactic glue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Truth Conditions

A

a proposition can be true or false in a given situation.
recipe for finding out the truth conditions -
‘Barack Obama is very happy’ is true iff the individual denoted by ‘Barack Obama’ is in the set of very happy things at the time in question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

iff

A

if and only if

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1-Place Predicate

A

verb takes just one argument (subject)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

2-Place Predicate

3-Place Predicate

A

involves 2 individuals

involves 3 individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

4-Place Predicate

A

syntactically a ditransitive verb but there is a difference between this and a 3-place predicate in semantics
involves 4 individuals:
[SHE] bet [ME] [THIS AMOUNT] [THAT…]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Propositional Attitudes

A

predicates that describe the way that individuals relate to propositions (believe, doubt, hope, consider)
“They believe that the Earth is flat”
- believe takes 2 arguments: an individual (they) and a proposition (the Earth is flat)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Recursion

A

can have attitudes about people’s attitudes

= recursion of propositional attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Using Logic to Refer to Individuals

A

constants: using a single lower-case letter
London is denoted by ‘l’
Obama is denoted by ‘o’

variables: using x, y, z

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Variable Individuals

A

meaning changes - denote different variables at different times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Using Logic to Refer to Predicates

A

Dog denotes a set of individuals that the have the property of being dogs.
{x : x is a dog}
property of individuals, denoted by x
{} - refers to set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Using Logic to Refer to Propositions

A
  • propositions either denote true or false.
  • if a proposition is formed from an individual and a set, the proposition denotes T or F iff the individual is in the set.
  • ‘Dog’ could denote a function mapping individuals in the set of dogs to T, and others to F (function dog’)

Fido denotes f
cat denotes cat’
Fido is a cat denotes cat’(f)
(T iff f is in {x: x is a cat}

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Using Logic to Refer to N-Place Predicates

A

a 1-place predicate is true or false of an individual; an n-place predicate is true or false of a list of individuals
- denotes sets of individuals

Love denotes { : x loves y} etc.
<> = list

Fido loves Butch denotes love’(f,b)
T iff ∈ {x,y : x loves y}
Fido gave Butch to Obama denotes give’(f,b,o)
T iff ∈ {x,y,z : x gave y to z}

18
Q

Using Logic to Refer to Propositional Connectives

A

for propositions P and Q

P & Q is true iff P is true and Q is true
P ∨ Q is true if at least one of P and Q is true (P or Q)
~P is true iff P is false (negation of P)
P -> Q is true unless P is true and Q is false (if P then Q)

19
Q

Using Logic to Refer to Propositions as Arguments

A

for now:

Believe denotes { : x believes that y}

20
Q

A ⊂ B, B ⊃ A

A

A is a proper subset of B; B is a proper superset of A (every member of A is also a member of B; at least one member of B is also a member of A)

21
Q

A ⊆ B

A

A is a subset of B (but also allows the possibility that A = B)

22
Q

|A| = 2

A

A contains 2 members (cardinality of A)

23
Q

|A| > |B|

A

A contains more members than B

24
Q

x ∈ A

A

x is a member of the set of A

25
x ∈/ A
x is not a member of the set of A
26
A ∩ B
the union of A and B (what you get if you join both sets together)
27
A - B
the complement of B with respect to A; the set of things which are members of A but not B (what happens if you take A and remove everything that is also in B)
28
Denotation of Quanitifiers
No dog smokes is true iff {x: x is a dog} ∩ {y: y smokes} = Ø (the union of x and y does not exist) Most dogs smoke is true iff |{x: x is a dog} ∩ {y: y smokes}| > |{x: x is a dog} - {y: y smokes}| (the amount of dogs that smoke is greater than the amount of dogs that don't)
29
Every dog smokes (shorthand for universal)
∀ | ∀x [dog'(x)][smoke'(x)]
30
Some dogs smoke (shorthand for existential)
∃ | ∃x [dog'(x)][smoke'(x)]
31
Restriction
roughly, the rest of the NP except for the determiner; the set of individuals we're talking about
32
Scope
the rest of the sentence except for the NP; what we're saying about the individuals identified by the restriction
33
Negation in Logic
Fido doesn't smoke: ~[smoke'(f)] | T iff f ∈/ {x: x smokes}
34
Scope Ambiguity
Unclear what the exact meaning of a sentence is: "Someone owns every dog" - One individual, many dogs. - Every dog is owned by a (possibly different) person.
35
Intersective Modification
the inclusion of an adnominal modifier restricts the denotation of N to a subset: a red dog is a member of the set of red things and the set of dogs: A red dog: ∃x [dog'(x) & red'(x)]
36
Conjunct Elimination
can infer that a red dog is a dog: | A red dog: [dog'(x) & red'(x)] -> dog'(x)
37
First Pass Analysis
every verbal predicate has an extra hidden argument position to accommodate an event argument - so butter is a 3-place predicate, snore is a 2-place predicate... event argument provides a referent for anaphoric 'it'
38
Adverbial Modifiers
Jones buttered the toast with his knife. | ∃e [butter'(j,t,e) & WITH(his-knife,e)]
39
Individuation
Multiple individuals and events can overlap
40
Incorporating Participant Roles
``` AGENT(x,e) = T iff x intentionally initiates e LOCATION(x,e) = T iff x is the location at which e occurs ``` Jones buttered the toast ∃e [butter'(e) & AGENT(j,e) & PATIENT(t,e)] butter'(e) = T iff e is an event of buttering