Social Influence Flashcards

(44 cards)

1
Q

Name the 3 types of conformity

A

Compliance
Identification
Internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Compliance

A

going along with a group publicly but no private acceptance, simply to fit in with a group and be accepted
-e.g. laughing at a joke you don’t find funny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Identification

A

changing behaviour to fit in with a group as there is something you value about part of the group ,public and temporary private acceptance as it isn’t maintained when you leave the group
-e.g. wearing trendy clothes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Internalisation

A

private and public acceptance of group norms,
permanent change in views/beliefs/behaviours even when group has left
-e.g. religion, politics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is conformity

A

A change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person/group of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explanations for conformity

A
  • Informative Social Influence(ISI)-can lead to internalisation
  • Normative Social Influence(NSI)-can lead to compliance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ISI

A

Informative Social Influence-
-the need to be right
-individuals follow the behaviour of the group as they are unsure what beliefs are right or wrong and want to be right
-cognitive process
e.g.
new situations, situations w ambiguity, crisis situations, 1 person/group is regarded as an expert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

NSI

A

Normative Social Influence
-the need to be liked
-individuals follow the group as they don’t like the appear foolish and prefer to gain social approval
-emotive process
e.g
most likely in situations w strangers, people we know, stressful situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conformity evaluation

A

research support ISI- students given maths answers that were easy or difficult, more conformity when difficult (conform in situations where they don’t know the answer)
Individual differences NSI-doesn’t affect everyone the same, those less concerned about being liked are less affected
-desire to be liked underlies+ weakens conformity explanation

together-deutsch and gerrard said ISI or NSI , usually is both(e.g. in Asch’s dissenter- could be social support or alternative info source), NSI often under detected as people rely on beliefs of what should motivate behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Asch’s research

A

procedure to assess how much people conform in a situation where the answer is unambiguous

  • shown card w standard line and other comparison lines w 2 clearly wrong
  • when asked for answer 6-8 confederates first all said right then all gave wrong answer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Asch evaluation

A
  • participants gave wrong answer 36.8% of the time
  • 75% conformed at some point
  • conformed to avoid rejection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Asch effect

A

extent to which participants conform even in an unambiguous situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Asch’s variations

A

Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Effect of group size

A

number of members within social group

  • whether size is more important than agreement of group (more confederates)
  • 3 confederates =conformity rose to 31.8%, more made little difference
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Effect of unanimity

A

degree to which the group members are in agreement with each other

  • whether another non-conforming confederate affects participant conformity
  • 25% conformity, reduced conformity and act more independently
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Effect of task difficulty

A

how obvious the correct answer is

  • made task harder, more lines closer in length
  • conformity increased
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Adorno et al

A

Investigated causes of obedient personality in 2000 white middle class Americans and measured on F(fascist) scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Authoritarian personality

A

Especially obedient and submissive to authority
Hatred for those w inferior social status
Inflexible outlook
Traditional attitudes to race, sex and gender
Need strong leader to solve this

19
Q

Authoritarian personality origins

A

Conditional love
Impossible high standards
Strict discipline
Create resentment and hostility,fear+anger displaced onto weaker people

20
Q

Agentic shift

A

Shift of responsibility from autonomous to Agentic state

21
Q

Result of Agentic shift

A

High moral strain

High anxiety as know it’s wrong but feel powerless

22
Q

Autonomous state

A

Individual feels responsible for their own actions and behave according to own principles

23
Q

Agentic state

A

Mental state where Individual feels no personal responsibility over their actions as they are acting for an authority figure

24
Q

Situational variables

A

Uniform
Location
Proximity

25
Proximity situational variable
Physical closeness of authority figure to to person carrying out order and victim Teacher closer to experimenter -higher obedience levels Drop to 40% learner same room Drop to 20.5% experimenter different room
26
Uniform situational variable
Clothes authority figure wears that symbolise position Wearing uniform increases obedience rate Normal clothes dropped to 20%
27
Location situational variable
Place where an order is issued, status or prestige of place can impact obedience More likely to over in prestigious setting Run down office block dropped to 47.5%
28
Authoritarian strengths
Small sample of participants interviewed after milgrams, more obedient= more authoritarian on d scale
29
Authoritarian limitations
May be correlation not causation as 3rd factor is involved Limited explanation as social identity can explain obedience Methodological problems as all items worded in sane direction Can’t establish cause abs effect as ethical issues w experiments on it so limit validity
30
Social psychological factors
Agentic state | Legitimacy of authority
31
Dispositional factors
Authoritarian | Locus of control
32
Situational factors
Social Support
33
Legitimacy of authority factors
Different cultures Responsibility Location
34
Legitimacy of authority
People are more likely to obey people they perceive to have authority over them Individuals granted power to punish if seen as legit authority figure but can turn destructive
35
Legitimacy of authority- different cultures
Different degrees to which people are traditionally obedient
36
Legitimacy of authority-responsibility
Given to person at top of hierarchy
37
Legitimacy of authority-location
Can increase and decrease legitimacy if authority
38
Social support
Resist pressure to conform or obey by having ally to break unanimity of group and avoid NSI More likely to disobey w support and doesn’t have to be valid to be effective,effected by when it arrives
39
Social support and asch
Confederate gave correct answer throughout and conformity drops to 5% when they start conforming again so does participant
40
Social support and milgram
2 extra confederate teachers who refused to go on, dropped to 10% went to 450v
41
Locus of control
Ability of people to withstand social pressure to conform to majority or obey authority Can explain resistance to SI The degree to which an individual feels they have control over their own life measured on continuoum
42
LoC types
Internal -things that happen to them effect by them self, so are more likely to resist social influence as personal responsibility so base choices in own believe e.g. hard work External- things that happen are outside their control so less likely to resist social influence e.g. less likely to resist SI
43
LoC evaluation strength
Holland repeated M’s study and measured if p were internal or external and 37% of intervals and 23% of externals continued to 450 Intervals showed greater resistance and less affected by Agentic state
44
LoC evaluation limitation
LoC only applies to new situations and in familiar previous experiences have more effect so only helpful explaining a few situations American public became more independent but also more external Could be due to changing society and more being out of control