Social Influence Flashcards
(44 cards)
Name the 3 types of conformity
Compliance
Identification
Internalisation
What is Compliance
going along with a group publicly but no private acceptance, simply to fit in with a group and be accepted
-e.g. laughing at a joke you don’t find funny
What is Identification
changing behaviour to fit in with a group as there is something you value about part of the group ,public and temporary private acceptance as it isn’t maintained when you leave the group
-e.g. wearing trendy clothes
What is Internalisation
private and public acceptance of group norms,
permanent change in views/beliefs/behaviours even when group has left
-e.g. religion, politics
What is conformity
A change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person/group of people
Explanations for conformity
- Informative Social Influence(ISI)-can lead to internalisation
- Normative Social Influence(NSI)-can lead to compliance
ISI
Informative Social Influence-
-the need to be right
-individuals follow the behaviour of the group as they are unsure what beliefs are right or wrong and want to be right
-cognitive process
e.g.
new situations, situations w ambiguity, crisis situations, 1 person/group is regarded as an expert
NSI
Normative Social Influence
-the need to be liked
-individuals follow the group as they don’t like the appear foolish and prefer to gain social approval
-emotive process
e.g
most likely in situations w strangers, people we know, stressful situations
Conformity evaluation
research support ISI- students given maths answers that were easy or difficult, more conformity when difficult (conform in situations where they don’t know the answer)
Individual differences NSI-doesn’t affect everyone the same, those less concerned about being liked are less affected
-desire to be liked underlies+ weakens conformity explanation
together-deutsch and gerrard said ISI or NSI , usually is both(e.g. in Asch’s dissenter- could be social support or alternative info source), NSI often under detected as people rely on beliefs of what should motivate behaviour
Asch’s research
procedure to assess how much people conform in a situation where the answer is unambiguous
- shown card w standard line and other comparison lines w 2 clearly wrong
- when asked for answer 6-8 confederates first all said right then all gave wrong answer
Asch evaluation
- participants gave wrong answer 36.8% of the time
- 75% conformed at some point
- conformed to avoid rejection
Asch effect
extent to which participants conform even in an unambiguous situation
Asch’s variations
Group size
Unanimity
Task difficulty
Effect of group size
number of members within social group
- whether size is more important than agreement of group (more confederates)
- 3 confederates =conformity rose to 31.8%, more made little difference
Effect of unanimity
degree to which the group members are in agreement with each other
- whether another non-conforming confederate affects participant conformity
- 25% conformity, reduced conformity and act more independently
Effect of task difficulty
how obvious the correct answer is
- made task harder, more lines closer in length
- conformity increased
Adorno et al
Investigated causes of obedient personality in 2000 white middle class Americans and measured on F(fascist) scale
Authoritarian personality
Especially obedient and submissive to authority
Hatred for those w inferior social status
Inflexible outlook
Traditional attitudes to race, sex and gender
Need strong leader to solve this
Authoritarian personality origins
Conditional love
Impossible high standards
Strict discipline
Create resentment and hostility,fear+anger displaced onto weaker people
Agentic shift
Shift of responsibility from autonomous to Agentic state
Result of Agentic shift
High moral strain
High anxiety as know it’s wrong but feel powerless
Autonomous state
Individual feels responsible for their own actions and behave according to own principles
Agentic state
Mental state where Individual feels no personal responsibility over their actions as they are acting for an authority figure
Situational variables
Uniform
Location
Proximity