Social influence Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

What are the 3 types of conformity and their definitions

A

Internalisation: Conforming publicly and privately as they have accepted the groups view. The presence of the group is not needed.

Identification: Conforming publicly and privately as they feel a sense of group membership. Adjusting options to the group so maybe temporary if they leave the group.

Compliance: Conforming publicly but not privately as opinions may adjust just to be accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define both types of social influence

A

Informational social influence: The need to be right because as humans we have a need to be certain and so we look to others to see their behaviours and opinions to help us shape our own.

Normative social influence: The need to be liked as we want others to like and respect us so we need to be accepted. Therefore we agree with them even if realistically we don’t.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the aim of Asch’s study

A

To assess to what extent people will conform to the opinion of others even in a situation where the answer is certain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What 3 variables did Asch investigate and what did he find with the conformity rate

A

Group size: With increasing the number of confederates from 1.. 2 ..3 up to 15 a curvilinear relationship was found where conformity rose to 31% with 3 confederates

Unanimity: He introduced a separate confederate to disagree with the rest. The rate decreased to less than a quarter then when the majority was unanimous

Task difficulty: When he made the lines more similar in length conformity increased as participants may have been unclear so looked to others for guidance and assume their right (ISI)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What 3 conclusions can be made from the 3 variables related to Ash’s findings

A

Group size: Findings suggest that most people are very sensitive to the views of other because just 1 or 2 confederates was enough to start to sway opinions

Unanimity: Findings suggest that the influence of the majority depends to a large extent on it being unanimous compared to participants having someone else who disagrees

Task difficulty: Maybe the situation is more ambiguous when the task becomes harder and the participants are unclear on an answer so may be looking to others for help and assume they are right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are 3 criticisms of Ash’s line study

A

Lacked ecological validity - as it was performed in artificial lab setting

Participants were deceived - by not being informed of the true aims which could be seen as an ethical issue as they may feel uneasy and as if they have been manipulated

Biased sample - as they were all American and all male meaning it cannot be generalised to other cultures and genders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a strength of Asch’s study (Research support)

A

Research support: Todd Lucas (2006) asked participants to solve maths problems

Participants were given answers from 3 (fake) students. Participants conformed more often when the problems were harder showing siilair results to those Asch collected.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define cognitive dissonance and demand characteristics

A

CD: An unpleasant feeling when two people have two simultaneous contradicting ideas

DC: When a participant may change their behaviour within a research situation as they receive a cue revealing the purpose of the investigation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define collectivist vs individualist culture

A

Collectivist: A group of people who place more value on the collective rather then the individual

Individualist: A group of people who place more value on the individual and result then the collective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the aim and conclusion of Zimbardo

A

Aim: There had been many prison riots in America and Zimbardo wanted to know why prison guards behave brutally and understand the relationshp between prisoners and guards, social roles?

Conclusion: Social roles appear to have a strong influence in individuals behaviour. The guards became brutal and the prisoners became. submissive. All roles were taken up quite easily by all participants no matter the role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are social roles and what do they do

A

The “parts” people play as members of different social groups. These give us expectations of how we and others should behave in a given role.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are situational attributions compared to dispositional attributions

A

Situational: Blame a persons behaviour on the situation

Dispositional: A person acted a certain way because of their personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define human de-individuation and de-humanisation

A

De-individuation: Where individuals have a lower self-awareness and a weaker sense of personal responsibility for their actions. Such as people losing their sense of identity and resorting to unsocialised and anti-social behaviour.

De-humanisation: Degrading people by lessening their human quantities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluate Zimbardo’s study + 1, - 2

A

+ Control: ‘Emotionally stable participants were chosen and assigned randomly to roles. This increased the internal validity of the study.

  • Lack of realism: Participants may have just been play acting rather than genuinely conforming basing off stereotypes with one guard claiming he tried to be like a character he saw on TV
  • Exaggerates the power of social roles: As only 1/3 of the guards actually behaved brutally, another third applied the rules faurly and the rest supported the prisoners (E.g - reinstating privileges)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define obediance

A

A type of social influence which causes a person to act a certain way (response) to a direct order. The person giving the order usually has power or authority over them with the ability to punish.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the aim and conclusion from Milgram’s study

A

Aim: He designed a baseline procedure that could be used to assess obedience levels

Conclusion: German people are not ‘different’. The American participants in this study were willing to obey orders even when they might harm another person. He suspected other factors in the situation encouraged obedience so decided to conduct further studies to investigate these.

17
Q

What were the 3 situational variables Milgram also conducted and what were the findings

A

Proximity: Teacher and learner were in the same room which led to a decrease in the obedience levels from the original 65% to 40%

Location: Conducted in a run-down office block rather than than in Yale University were obediance levels fell to 47.5%

Uniform: The experimenter was called away and the role was taken over by ‘an ordinary member of the public’ (confederate) in ‘everyday’ clothes rather than a lab coat. This led to a decrease to 20%, the lowest of these conditions.

18
Q

What are situational variable vs dispositional variables

A

Situational: Features of the immediate physical and social environment which may influence a persons behaviour.

19
Q

Define agentic and autonomous state

A

Agentic: A mental state where we feel no personal responsibility for our behaviour or actions as we feel we are acting on behalf of an authority figure.

Autonomous: Free to behave according to their own principles and feel a sense of responsibility for their actions.

20
Q

Define legitimacy of authority

A

An explanation for obedience which suggests that we are more likely to obey people who we perceive to have authority over us.

21
Q

What are the 2 binding factors which allow and keep a person in an agentic state

A

Ignoring the damaging effect of their behaviour reduces the ‘moral strain feeling’

Shifting responsibility to the victim or denying the damage

22
Q

What is destructive authority

A

When LOA becomes destructive. Such as leaders suing their legitimate powers for destructive purposes such as ordering people to behave in cruel and dangerous ways.

23
Q

Define AP personality

A

A personality that Adorno argued was especially susceptible to obeying people in authority.

Submissive to those in higher status but dismissive of inferiors

24
Q

Where does AP come from

A

It forms in childhood as a result of harsh parenting such as strict discipline and impossible high standards. Parents give conditioned love, depending on how they behave.

These experiences create hostility which they cannot express so their fear is displaced onto others who are weaker )or perceived to be)

25
What is the F-scale
A questionnaire where the questions focus on peoples attitudes toward authority and power. Participants have to agree or disagree with statements
26
List and define the 3 types of consent
Presumptive: A similar group of people are asked if the study is acceptable (presuming) Prior general consent: Participants give their consent to take part in a number of different studies including one involving deception Retrospective consent: Asked fro consent during the debrief.
27
Define locus of control and social support
Locus of control: The sense we have about what directs events in our lives. 'Internals' believe they are directly responsible for what happens to them. 'Externals' believe it is mainly a matter of luck or other factors. SS: The presence of people who resist pressures to conform or obey can help others to do the same. These people act as models to show others that resistance to social influence is possible.
28
List and define the 2 types of social support
Resisting conformity: If there are other present who are not conforming, simply the fact that someone else is not following the majority is SS. Enables the participant to be free with the confederate acting as a model of independent behaviour Resisting obedience: If there is another who is seen to disobey the rate of obedience drops. The other persons disobedience acts as a model of dissent for the participant to copy and free.
29
Define Minority influence
A form of social influence in which a minority of people persuades others to adopt their beliefs, attitudes or behaviours. Leads to internalisation in which private attitudes change as well as public behaviour
30
Define social change and influence
Change: This occurs when whole societies rather than just individuals adopt new attitudes , beliefs and ways of doing things. Influence: The process by which individuals and groups change each others attitudes and behaviours.
31
What are the 6 lessons from minority influence research
1. Drawing attention 2. Consistency 3. Deeper processing 4. Augmentation principle 5. Snowball effect 6. Social cryptomnesia
32