socialism normal Flashcards
(134 cards)
what is collectivism?
it maintains that humans can achieve their political, social and economic objectives more
effectively through collective action than through individual eff ort. Collectivism also implies that
society can only be transformed by collective endeavour – for socialists, it offers a way of achieving
an ideal society
it is one of the most important ideas underpinning socialist ideology, informing other socialist values and pricples such as equality, welfare and common ownership.
what do socialist believe in collectivism?
From a moral perspective, the interests of the group – such as a society or a community – should
take priority over individual self-interest. Collective eff ort encourages social unity and a sense of
social responsibility towards others.
* In practical economic terms, collectivism utilises the capabilities of the whole of society
efficiently, avoiding the wastefulness and limited impact of competitive individual eff ort
inherent in the capitalist economy
why do they emphasize this?
it is rooted in the view of human nature that does argue that all humans are social animals as such they prefer to live in social groups rather than alone.
-humans have the capacity for collective action and can work together to achieve their goals in this sense they are tied by the bonds of fraternity.
what do socialist say about human nature?
-it is moulded by social conditions the experiences and circumstances of a person life. according to the socialist view people can be only defined or understood in terms of the social groups that they belong to.
-socialist do say that membership of a community or society does offer humans true freedom or fulfilment.
how do they collectivism should or could be in place in society?
-socialist do call for a form of state intervention and state planning to promote collectivist goals and ensure the distribution of good and services is not left to free market forces.
-pursuit of collectivism is commonly seen to involve the growth of the state, expansion of the state services and responsibilities and an increase in state spending.
what do marxists say about how collectivism should be endorsed ?
Marxists and state socialists advocate collective action through a centralised state that organises
all (or nearly all) production and distribution. For example, in the USSR after 1929, most industries
were nationalised and all agricultural land was collectivised in order to transform a backward
state into a modern industrial society, using complete state control of the economy to bring about
change. After the Second World War, communist regimes in China and eastern Europe pursued
similar policies of state-controlled collectivism.
what do moderate socialist say about collectivism?
moderate socialists who accept some degree of free-market capitalism in the economy have
pursued collectivism in a more limited way. For instance, the 1945–51 Labour government in the
UK nationalised key industries – such as coal, electricity, and iron and steel – but left much of the
economy in private hands
why is collectivism cristed?
Because collectivism emphasises group action and common interests, it suppresses human
individuality and diversity.
* As collectivist objectives can only really be advanced through the agency of the state, it leads to
the growth of arbitrary state power and the erosion of individual freedoms.
why have socialist moved away from collectivism?
- there is a growing perception that collectivism in developed countries such as the uk was producing a dependency culture and a sluggish uncompetitive economic sector.
-end of the cold war in 1989 and the collapse of the ussr in 199 reinforced this view as it did suffer a ideological defeat.
what do socialist say about common humanity?
The socialist belief in a common humanity is also based on assumptions about human nature.
Socialists see humans as social creatures with a tendency towards co-operation, sociability and
rationality; humans naturally prefer to co-operate with, rather than compete against, each other.
-they argue that humans are naturally inclined to work together for the common good and that co-operative effort
produces the best results for society
what do socialist say about what people benefit from common humanity?
-people who co operate rather than compete with each other do form connection based on understanding, respect and mutual support.
-they channel the capabilities of the whole group or community rather than just the potential of a individual.
what do they say happens if the opposite to common humanity happens (competition)?
- socialist do view competition as wasteful, promotes social divisions and generates conflict, hostility and resentment.
-they set that capitalist economic competition does set one person against each other a process that does encourage people to reject or disregard their common humanity rather than accept it
-it does encourage humans to be self centred and belligerent.
what had the emphasis on common humanity led socialist to conclude?
-human motivation can be driven not just by material considerations but also by a moral view of people role in society.
-people should work hard to improve their society as they have a sense of responsibility.
- a moral incentive to improve society does rest on the acceptance of common humanity.
what doo socilaist say about the economy and the state in relation to rewards and common humanity>
-they accept the need for at least some material rewards to motivate people but they also stress it should be linked to moral incentive.
-co operative effort to boost economic growth not only increases living standards but also does provide funds to finance welfare measures to help the vulnerable and poor.
-the belief in common humanity has led socialist to support and interventionist role for the state.
-Marxist argue that the agency of the state can be used to control economic production and distribution for the benefit of everyone.
-social democrats advocate a more limited form of welfare and redistribution programmes to help those in need.
why do socialist justify equality?
it does ensure fairness:
economic inequality is apparently due to the inequalities in a capitalist society. some socialist do therefore reject equality of opportunity as such a concept does justifies the unequal treatment of people on the ground of innate ability.
-this argument reflect a view that does emphasis people who are born with a potential to be equal.
-other socialist say inequality in the form of differential rewards in inevitable to some extent.
-these socialist do endorse an egalitarian approach to ensure that people are treated less unequally in terms of material rewards and living conditions.
-without this commitment to egalitarianism formal political and legal equality is comprised as the latter does nothing to tackle the inequalities inherent in capitalism.
why do socialist justify equality?
it does reinforce collectivism, cooperation and solidarity within society and the economy
-humans are more likely to cooperate if they share the same economic conditions.
-e.g. Sweden has high levels of social equality as it is based on extensive wealth distribution and social welfare.
-social inequality does encourage conflict and instability.
-societies inequalities are unstable as they are divided into the have and have nots
-if not addressed the section of society would revolt for example shown in Russia in 1917 and in Mexico in 1910-20.
why do socialist justify equality?
social equality is a means of satisfying basic human needs.
-it is essential to human fulfilment
-socialist do call for equal distribution of wealth and resources to promote human fulfilment and realise human potential.
-in terms of the economy they say a free market cannot allocate wealth and resources fairly.
-they say redistribution can only provide for everyone, irrespective of social position.
what do Marxist say about equality?
Marxists, demand absolute equality for everyone in terms of material rewards
and life opportunities. Such equality can be guaranteed only by the controlled distribution of
goods and services, the abolition of private property and the introduction of common ownership
of all means of production. Under this system, the state exercises common ownership and
supervises the distribution of resources to prevent the return of social and economic inequalities.
what do social democrats say about equality?
By contrast, social democrats call for more limited state intervention to achieve relative equality
within society via welfare measures, government spending and progressive taxation. Their primary
aim is to remove absolute poverty and, if this can be achieved, then a certain level of inequality can
be tolerated. For social democrats, the state does not own or control all the means of production
– its role is to adjust distribution to narrow differences in wealth and life chances. In essence, social
democrats seek to reform rather than abolish capitalism and for this reason maintain that material
incentives continue to play an important role in human motivation. As a result, the social-democrat
position on social equality is flexible enough to embrace equality of opportunity.
why do socialist endorse common ownerhsip?
As wealth is created by the communal endeavour of humans, it should be owned collectively, not
by individuals.
* Private property encourages materialism and fosters the false belief that the achievement of
personal wealth will bring fulfilment.
* Private property generates social conflict between ‘have’ and ‘have-not’ groups, such as owners
and workers
what do moderate socialist say about common ownership?
More moderate socialists, including
the Attlee Labour government in the UK (1945–51), have opted for limited common ownership by
nationalising only key strategic industries, including the coal mines, the railways and steel-making,
leaving much of the economy in private hands
what disagreements are there among socialist within equality of outcome?
Equality of outcome maintains that rewards should be based
on an individual’s contribution. Since this will vary from person
to person some inequality will persist but dierences in
rewards will not be as marked as in the free-market system.
Equality of outcome tends to be supported by fundamentalist
socialists (who reject capitalism) as a way of removing the free
market’s influence but opposed by social democrats and the
Third Way as a form of artificial social and economic
‘levelling’.
what disagreements are there among socialist about equality of oppounity?
Equality of opportunity is based on the principle that everyone
should have an equal chance to make the best of their
abilities. There should be a ‘level playing field’ with no artificial
barriers to progress for those with ability, talent and a positive
attitude to hard work. This approach is supported by social
democrats and the Third Way on meritocratic grounds but
rejected by Marxists because it does not seek to remove
capitalism and its structural inequalities.
what do socialist disagree about equality of welfare?
Equality of welfare accepts that human society is inevitably
unequal but also maintains that every individual is entitled to
have an equal minimum standard of living guaranteed by state
welfare provision. Equality of welfare is endorsed by social
democrats and the Third Way because it provides a vital safety
net for the most vulnerable in society. Marxists reject it
because this welfare provision does not seek to remove
capitalism and its structural inequalities.