Sociocultural Paper 1 Studies Flashcards
(63 cards)
Aim of Tajfel 1970 (Klee vs Kandinsky)
To investigate the minimal conditions under which discrimination between social groups could be brought about.
Participants and Procedure of Tajfel 1970 (Klee vs Kandinsky)
- 48 schoolboys 14 -15 years old
- randomly allocated to either a ‘Klee group’ or to a ‘Kandinsky group’
- This took place after they had been involved in an exercise where they were successively shown a series of slides of six pairs of unlabeled and unsigned abstract paintings.
- They were told they were by the artists Klee and Kandinsky and were asked to express their preferences for one or the other as the slides were displayed.
-After they had said which paintings they preferred, the boys were told, (on a purely random basis), that they were in the ‘Klee’ group or the ‘Kandinsky’ group. - the boys were then asked to allocate points
- (worth 1/10 of a penny each).
- Such allocation was anonymous, and the boys were asked to work separately on this in individual cubicles.
- A matrix was used that allowed them to vary how the points were allocated.
Results of Tajfel 1970 (Klee vs Kandinsky)
- When the boys had the choice between maximizing the profit for all and maximizing the profit for their own group, they chose the latter.
- They were found to be more concerned with creating as large a difference as possible between the amounts allocated to each group (in favor of their own group), than in gaining a greater amount for everybody, across the two groups.
Conclusion of Tajfel 1970 (Klee vs Kandinsky)
- This is evidence of blatant discrimination associated with the categorisation of the boys into apparently meaningless social groups.
-It forms the basis of Tajfel’s minimal group paradigm - the concept of what is the minimum requirements for categorization to occur
Evaluation of Tajfel 1970 (Klee vs Kandinsky)
- The study effectively established the bare minimum for group membership.
- Clearly illustrated in group bias in the context of resource competition.
- Controlled Environment
- The study was conducted in a lab, therefore it had high levels of control over variables.
- lacked both ecological validity and mundane realism.
- The study was conducted on 14 -15 year old boys results cannot be extrapolated or generalized to a broader population.
- The research was conducted on participants under the age of 18 and therefore their parents would have had to give their consent for their children’s participation.
- Deception was used to hide the true aim from participants.
Aim of Schaller 1991 (Ingroup vs Outgroup Stereotypes)
Carried out an experiment to see how group membership may lead to stereotyping
Participants and Procedure of Schaller 1991 (Ingroup vs Outgroup Stereotypes)
- Participants were randomly assigned to be members of a group
- Presented with a series of statements that described members of their ingroup(the group they had been assigned to) and their outgroup
- The statements described both desirable and undesirable behaviors
Results of Schaller 1991 (Ingroup vs Outgroup Stereotypes)
- When participants were asked about their own group, they recalled stereotyping statements that favored their own group - in group bias
- Showed negative stereotyping of their out group
Conclusion/Evaluation of Schaller 1991 (Ingroup vs Outgroup Stereotypes)
- Superficial approach to identity
- Very controlled conditions lessen ecological validity
- Origins of stereotyping
- Social identity theory
Aim of Bandura 1963 (Bobo doll)
To see if observing aggression in films (human and cartoon characters) would result in different levels of imitative aggression than observing aggression of live models (used in 1961 study).
Participants and Procedure of Bandura 1963 (Bobo doll)
real-life human aggression: same procedure as the 1961 study
filmed human aggression: film was projected on to a wall while the child played in a darkened room of a model behaving aggressively
Cartoon character aggression: cartoon playing in the room of a female model dressed as a cat behaved aggressively
control group: same procedure as the 1961 study
Results of Bandura 1963 (Bobo doll)
All 3 conditions displayed higher aggression than the control (Mean = real: 83, Human: 92, Cartoon: 99, Control: 54). Aggression levels were not significantly different for the cartoon compared to the real model. There was no significant gender difference in aggression levels but those who watch the male role model displayed more gun play than those who saw the female role model
Conclusion/Evaluation of Bandura 1963 (Bobo doll)
Children learn aggression via observation and imitation, whether the model is real or cartoon
Standardised so consistent - can share/compare results
Boys and girls samples used
Difficult to generalise - all from Stanford uni nursery, doesn’t represent whole population
Lacks ecological - not everyday surrounding, not represent real life
Lacks validity - not really measuring aggression (pushing Bobo doll - is it’s nature)
Caused distress, may have had long term effects
Aim of Odden and Rochet 2004 (Samoan fishing)
To study the role of observational learning (based on social cognitive theory) in enculturation in Samoa
Participants and Procedure of Odden and Rochet 2004 (Samoan fishing)
This study was an observational, longitudinal study (lasting 25 months) of 28 children in one Samoan village
In Samoan culture, adults have a non-interventionist approach to their children. Parents do not spend much time with their children, believing that children can learn important skills and values on their own. Thus, this culture provided a unique opportunity to assess the role of observational learning
Observations were made of the children’s behavior over 25 months, and at the end of the study, children completed a multiple choice test that tested their knowledge of the values of Samoan society, including the Chief system
Results of Odden and Rochet 2004 (Samoan fishing)
Children were not taught how to fish, as the supply of fishing equipment was limited. However, children spent a great deal of time observing how adults fished. By the time the children were 10, they began borrowing fishing equipment (without any adult supervision), and by 12 most were capable fishermen (despite never being taught how to fish)
Conclusion of Odden and Rochet 2004 (Samoan fishing)
Observational learning plays a significant role in enculturation. It is possible for children to learn the values, norms and behaviors of their culture simply by observation and imitation
Evaluation of Odden and Rochet 2004 (Samoan fishing)
A strength of this study is its longitudinal design - by collecting observations over a period of 25 months, researchers were able to observe children acquire new skills (such as fishing) over the course of the study
On the other hand, this study only involved participants from one Samoan village, so it is not certain that observational learning plays such a significant role in other cultures
This was an observational study, without a standardized method for data collection. Therefore, there is always the risk of researcher bias - researchers might have given more weight to observations that confirmed their hypothesis, and less weight to observations that challenged it
Aim of Corell (Shooter Bias Stereotype)
Does race of a person change the likelihood of shooting that person
Participants and Procedure of Corell (Shooter Bias Stereotype)
Participants played a game in which the goal was to shoot armed targets and not shoot unarmed targets
target race: black or white
object target was holding: weapon or non-weapon
Noted the numbers of errors made (shoot unarmed person)
With two error types: shoot an unarmed target and fail to shoot an armed target
Results of Corell (Shooter Bias Stereotype)
participants more likely to shoot unarmed black targets and fail to shoot armed white targets
Conclusion/Evaluation of Corell (Shooter Bias Stereotype)
Fatigue may increase shooter bias. the fact that you would have much more adrenaline when you are in a life or death situation have effect it. How would things change in considering the group effect? cops make less aggressive decisions when they are alone.
Aim of Kulkofsky 2011 (Individualism vs Collectivism FBM)
The researchers studied five countries - China, Germany, Turkey, the UK and the USA - to see if there was any difference in the rate of flashbulb memories in collectivistic and individualistic culture
Participants and Procedure of Kulkofsky 2011 (Individualism vs Collectivism FBM)
274 adults from five different countries - China, Germany, Turkey, the UK and the USA. All participants were identified as “middle class.’
Participants were given five minutes to recall as many memories as they could of public events in their lifetime. They were then given a memory questionnaire which was similar to the one used by Brown & Kulik (1977). These questions included where they had learned of the event, what time of day it was and what they were doing when they heard about it. They were then asked questions about the importance of the event - including how personally important it was, how surprised they were and how often they had spoken about it since it happened. All questionnaires were provided in the native language of the participants.