SPRING Self Regulation

Question 1

what is self regulation

carver and sheier 1982

Answer 1

process in which people adapt and manage various goals and standards for their thoughts/feelings/behaviours - ensure standards and goals are met

Question 2

what does self regulation tend to involve

Answer 2

goal settting 
goal monitoring
multiple goal management
self control
emotional regualtion

Question 3

describe the iceberg illusion

Answer 3

people seem successful but achievements often take a lot of challenges that not seen on outside
BUT successful often good at dealing with failure and disappointments

Question 4

what does the self regulation of goal persuit tend to involve

Answer 4

1. make goal concrete and engate to attain
2. set goal if desireable/feasible
3. monitor for goal success and adapt
4. act on means and overcome obstacles
5. achieve and disengage

Question 5

what is a goal

Answer 5

mental/cognitive representation of a desired outcome -
ideal of how we want things to turn our
goal schema - contain info on means, obstacles and outcomes
different from current state

Question 6

define goal means

Answer 6

activities objects or people that are instrumental in achieving goal/in goal pursuit

Question 7

on what aspects do goals differ in that determine respective commitment towards persuit of that goal
fishbein and azjen 1974

Answer 7

commitment = importance/value of goal x percieved success/expectation of attainment

Question 8

what is an abstraction level of goal pursuit

Answer 8

different levels of goal success - means end golals facilitate achievement of higher order goals
change focus to motivate or reach higher goal

Question 9

focus on lower goal to

Answer 9

achieve higher goal

Question 10

focus on higher goal to

Answer 10

be motivated to keep going

Question 11

describe higgins 1998 regulatory focus orientation of goals

Answer 11

self regulation operated differently when serving fundamentally different needs
focus: promotional or prevention
focus may be result of chronic individual tendencies or situational factors (momentary reg focus) where induced by task instructions ie do this or avoid this..

Question 12

how are goals represented in memory

kruglanski et al 2001

Answer 12

goals linked via facilitative or inhibitory links
- one goal activate or inhibit subgoals to reach etc
goals primed by environmental context in which they are persued
goal focus cannot be considered in isolation - salience and interrelation of goals impact on persuit

Question 13

describe goal sheilding

Answer 13

activation of an important goal makes other goals lower in accessability
- when highly committed to big goal, list fewer smaller goals

Question 14

extrinsic motivation for reaching a desired goal

lewin 1935

Answer 14

associate with achieving a goal

external factors ie money or social approval

Question 15

intrinsic motivation for reaching a desired goal

lewin 1935

Answer 15

assoc with persuing a goal

internal factors from within the person ie find fun, interesting, fulfills needs

Question 16

deci koestner and ryan 2002 overjustification effect

Answer 16

meta analysis of 128 experiements on intrinsic and extrinsic rewards on task performance
tangible rewards (ie physical - food or symbols - awards) undermines intrinsic motivation to perform the subsequent task

Question 17

describe lepper et al 1973 superiority of intrinsic rewards

overjustification effect

Answer 17

kintergarden children intrinsicly motivated to play with markers or rewarded (extrinsic) or not
% time spent playing greater when intrinsic than rewarded

Question 18

describe fishbach superiority of intrinsic rewards

overjustification effect

Answer 18

people do more when interesting, challenging or fun
sig less likely to reach goal if extrinsicly motivated
external good for starting but internal good for continuing
spend 10+ more mins at gym if like running on treadmill

Question 19

describe shah 2003 automatic activation of goals

Answer 19

pps asked to indicate first name of mother - activate parental schema of expectation and prime goals of doing well in school
rate commitment to goal that mother wants to pursue
- more motivated to perform well in lab tasks
(BUT PARENTS ACTIVATE LOTS OF EXPECTATION SCHEMAS) - the more goals assoc with person the less likely any one goal will be activated

Question 20

describe vogt et al 2011 goal and vision

Answer 20

activate goal of cleanliness by placing in environment with soap and water
exp: touch fake gross object or control touch neutral object
offer to wash hands
disgust condition increase wash hands even though fake + attention in disgust condition more oriented towards images representing cleanliness than controls who were equally attentive to disgust imagery
- deploy attention in averse emotional states guided by goal to alleviate neg state

Question 21

fishbach and bargh

goals and attitudes

Answer 21

pps actively engage in goal persuit compared to those not persuing goals will automatically eval goal relevant stimuli as more positive than goal irrelevant stimuli
automatic eval predict behavioural intent to persue goal via relevant object
+ neg attitudes towards obstructing stimuli

Question 22

define the zeigarnik effect (zeigarnnik 1929)

Answer 22

people remember uncompleted tasks and goals better than completed ones - intrustive thoughts until goal is achieved
BUT some dwell on important achieved tasks

Question 23

describe buehler et al 1994 students and planning

Answer 23

students underestimate how long it takes for them to complete assignments
even when making pessimistic predictions

Question 24

describe planning fallacy

Answer 24

tendency to be overly optimistic and underestimate the impact /weight of unexpected problems to attaining goal

Question 25

how does imagining the consequences of a goal effect goal success

Answer 25

positive thoughts/feelings about end goal may impede ability to achieve as not take into account obstacles goal pursuit requires monitoring for progess and preparing for possible problems

Question 26

carver and sheier 2001 cybernetic control and feedback on goal regulation

Answer 26

compare actual and expecte progress decrepancy between current and desired end goal state pos feedback make feel better and more likely to reduce efforts neg feedback feel worse and increase efforts to reach goal

Question 27

describe fishbach and finkelstein 2012 refined view of social monitoring

Answer 27

if value of goal or ability to achieve is uncrear then both positive and negative feedback can be equally motivating pos - must be doing right thing so keep going neg - need to do more to achieve so keep going psoitive often start of goal and neg to keep going

Question 28

describe leithorn 2003 goal setting criteria

Answer 28

SMART goals must be specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time based cant be too easy or too hard - must be challenged but not put off

Question 29

shoda et al 1990/casey et al 2012 - delayed gratification and self control

Answer 29

marshmallow - ability to wait for second marshmallow at 4 years preict increased self control, academic success, social fncitoning and coping skills into adolescence

Question 30

what does good self control predict

Answer 30

ability to avoid exposuure to temptation | not exposed to several self control conflict in sequence

Question 31

deliberative phase in goal persuit

Answer 31

must decie on the goals want to persue determine based on desirability and attainability - open minded and consider realistic obstacles commitment may not require much conscious deliberation - learn about ourselves via our behaviours (bern)

Question 32

implementation phase of goal persuit

Answer 32

act on means to achieve esired goal, monitor progress and identify/overcome obstacles act on negative feedback as a means to achieve

Question 33

kruglanski et al 2002 organisation of goals

Answer 33

thought to be organised into a mental framework/schematic framework each goal is connected to the activities/objects that relate to the goal and help in goal attainment therefor personal and situational factors can prime goal activation and facilitate avoidance of obstacles and approach to facilitative means

Question 34

abstraction level of goal persuit and carver and sheier progress discrepancy

Answer 34

focus on higher order goals may motivate but can also worsen if doing better than expected then likely to reduce motivation or shift focus to other goals

Question 35

higgins 1998 promotional focus

Answer 35

"i want to achieve" emphasis on ideas hopes and aspirations concerned with presence or absence of positive outcomes - gain-no gain

Question 36

higgins 1998 prevention focus

Answer 36

"i want to avoid" - slow but careful self reg concerned with absence or presence of neg outcomes reflect duties responsibilities and obligations emphasis on safety and responsibility - what should do no loss-loss

Question 37

crowe and higgins 1997 regulatory focus and task performance

Answer 37

promotional focus link to eagerness to ensure hits and avoid missess - faster and more careless preventional focus link to vigilance to ensure correctly reect and avoid false alarms - more attentive and slower means

Question 38

shah et al 2002 goal sheilding

Answer 38

pps report less alternative goals when highly commited to one highly important goal UNLESS alternative goals have a facilitative attachment to the focal goal attainment

Question 39

balcetis and dunning 2006 goals and perception of the world

Answer 39

pps motivated to see symbol in environ as B > 13 when goal to avoid seeing number to avoid drinking gross tasting juice

Question 40

fishbach and ferguson 2007 goals and accessability of memory contents

Answer 40

accessability of memories fluctuate according to activation across time and situations goals consist of an array in interconnected related memories and accessability to any one may activated related memories BUT if one memory is conflicting to goa then inhibit

Question 41

fitzsimmons and fishbach 2010 goals and attitudes - closeness

Answer 41

people will draw closer to significant others who are instrumental (vs. noninstrumental) for a goal that has not been progressing well—a goal that is thus high in motivational priority. When participants perceived they had made progress on goal, they no longer preferred others who promoted goal progress (vs. those who did not promote progress). Instead, they looked to their social relationships for their instrumentality for other important goals that have not been progressing as well, drawing more closely to others who can help with those other, less progressed, goals.

Question 42

holmes 1990 reverse zeigarnik effect

Answer 42

when a task has high important and involvement of self esteem, recall of the goal even after completion will remain high motivated to create a favourable impression of the self by recalling success

Question 43

peetz et al 2013 planning fallacy and relationships

Answer 43

when people motivated to focus on their feelings for their partner, become more responsive to partners needs and make bigger promises BUT does not change conscientiousness for self regulation and maintenance of promise and therefore those more likely to promise more are more likely to break their promises

Question 44

commitment view of goal progress and regulation

Answer 44

view actions as a part of the goal pursuit reinforces commitment towards the goal ie buying sale items saves money so keep saving money

Question 45

progress view of goal progress and regulation

Answer 45

biew actions as facilitating progress towards the end state cause disengagement ie buy sale items so saved money, closer to goal and can have a break - lead to "splurge"

Question 46

the refined view of goal monitoring | fishback and finkelstein 2012

Answer 46

when dont know value of goal or ability to achieve goal is unclear pos feesback motivates initial progress towards goal and neg feedback motivates continuation towards goal

Question 47

define ego depletion in self control

Answer 47

exhaustion of resources from initial act of self control depleted resources when face second event when reuire self control - self control like a muscle and gets worn out but strengthens with use

Question 48

le baumeister et al 1998 self control

Answer 48

pps eat radishes over choc less persistent on subsequent unsolvable puzzle than pps eat choc