T4 - Role of the state in the macroeconomy Flashcards

(61 cards)

1
Q

What are the market-orientated strategies for economic growth and development?

A

Trade liberalisation: Removing tariffs and trade barriers to encourage international trade.
Promotion of FDI: Attracting foreign direct investment to boost economic activity.
Removal of government subsidies: Reducing government intervention in the market.
Floating exchange rate systems: Allowing the currency to fluctuate based on market forces.
Microfinance schemes: Providing small loans to individuals or businesses to stimulate entrepreneurship.
Privatisation: Selling state-owned enterprises to the private sector to improve efficiency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the interventionist strategies for economic growth and development?

A

Development of human capital: Investing in education and healthcare to improve the workforce.
Protectionism: Protecting domestic industries through tariffs and quotas.
Managed exchange rates: Government intervention in currency markets to stabilize the exchange rate.
Infrastructure development: Investment in physical infrastructure like roads, energy, and communication systems.
Promoting joint ventures with global companies: Encouraging partnerships to boost foreign investment and technology transfer.
Buffer stock schemes: Stabilizing prices of key commodities by buying and storing them during times of surplus and releasing them during shortages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are some other strategies for economic growth and development

A

Industrialisation (Lewis model): Developing industrial sectors to move workers from agriculture to manufacturing.
Development of tourism: Leveraging natural or cultural attractions to boost economic activity.
Development of primary industries: Expanding agriculture, mining, or fishing industries to increase export revenues.
Fairtrade schemes: Ensuring producers in developing countries receive a fair price for their goods.
Aid: Financial assistance provided by governments or international organizations to support development.
Debt relief: Reducing or canceling debt owed by developing countries to encourage economic growth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the role of international institutions and NGOs in development?

A

World Bank: Provides loans and grants to developing countries for development projects.
International Monetary Fund (IMF): Offers financial assistance and advice to countries in economic distress.
Non-Government Organisations (NGOs): Provide aid, support community projects, and help improve living standards through various initiatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the distinction between capital expenditure, current expenditure, and transfer payments?

A

Capital expenditure: Spending on long-term assets (e.g., infrastructure, buildings).
Current expenditure: Spending on day-to-day government activities (e.g., wages, maintenance).
Transfer payments: Payments from the government to individuals without any exchange of goods or services (e.g., pensions, unemployment benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the reasons for the changing size and composition of public expenditure in a global context?

A

Economic growth: Increased income leads to higher government revenues and demand for services.
Demographic changes: Aging populations lead to increased healthcare and pension spending.
Globalization: Increased government expenditure on international trade, defense, and global cooperation.
Technological advancements: Need for investments in education, research, and development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the impacts of differing levels of public expenditure as a proportion of GDP?

A

Productivity and growth: Higher public expenditure can stimulate growth, especially on infrastructure and education.
Living standards: Greater expenditure on healthcare, education, and welfare improves living standards.
Crowding out: Excessive government spending can crowd out private investment if funded by high taxation.
Level of taxation: High public expenditure may require higher taxes, affecting incentives to work.
Equality: Higher public spending can reduce income inequality through welfare programs and public services.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the distinction between progressive, proportional, and regressive taxes?

A

Progressive tax: The tax rate increases as income increases (e.g., income tax).(lower proprtion of lower incomes)
Proportional tax: The tax rate remains constant regardless of income (e.g., flat tax).
Regressive tax: The tax rate decreases as income increases (e.g., sales tax).
(takes a larger proportion of lower incomes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the economic effects of changes in direct and indirect tax rates?

A

Incentives to work: Higher income taxes may reduce the incentive to work harder or longer hours.
Tax revenues: The Laffer curve shows that beyond a certain point, higher taxes may reduce revenue due to lower economic activity.
Income distribution: Changes in taxes can affect the income distribution, making it more or less equitable.
Real output and employment: Higher taxes can reduce consumption and investment, leading to lower output and employment.
Price level: Indirect taxes like VAT can increase the price level by raising production costs.
Trade balance: Changes in taxes may influence domestic consumption and imports, affecting the trade balance.
FDI flows: Tax rates influence the attractiveness of a country for foreign investment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the difference between automatic stabilisers and discretionary fiscal policy?

A

Automatic stabilisers: Government policies that automatically adjust with changes in the economy (e.g., unemployment benefits rise during recessions).
Discretionary fiscal policy: Deliberate policy decisions made by the government, such as changes in tax rates or public spending.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the difference between a fiscal deficit and national debt

A

Fiscal deficit: The difference between government spending and revenue in a given year (annual deficit).
National debt: The total amount of money the government owes, accumulated over time due to running fiscal deficits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the distinctions between structural and cyclical deficits?

A

Structural deficit: A deficit that exists even when the economy is at full potential, due to fundamental imbalances in government finances.
Cyclical deficit: A deficit that occurs due to economic downturns, which reduce tax revenues and increase welfare spending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the factors influencing the size of fiscal deficits and national debts?

A

πŸ“‰ 1. Economic Recession β†’ Lower Tax Revenues + Higher Spending
During a downturn, unemployment rises and profits fall β†’

Government collects less from income and corporation taxes β†’

Meanwhile, spending on welfare (e.g. benefits) increases β†’

Budget deficit widens and national debt rises as borrowing fills the gap.

πŸ—οΈ 2. Expansionary Fiscal Policy β†’ More Borrowing
Government may boost AD through higher spending or tax cuts β†’

This is often funded by borrowing rather than tax increases β†’

Leads to a fiscal deficit in the short term β†’

Adds to the national debt over time if deficits persist.

πŸ’Έ 3. Interest Rates on Existing Debt β†’ Debt Servicing Costs
If interest rates on government bonds rise β†’

The cost of servicing national debt increases β†’

A larger share of tax revenue is spent on interest β†’

May lead to further borrowing if tax revenues don’t rise accordingly.

πŸ’Ό 4. Political Priorities & Policy Choices
Governments may choose to prioritise public investment (e.g. infrastructure, NHS) β†’

Even if this means running a short-term deficit β†’

Especially during election cycles to appeal to voters β†’

Can worsen fiscal deficit if not matched with long-term revenue plans.

🌍 5. Global Events (e.g. Pandemics, Wars)
Shocks like COVID-19 or war in Ukraine β†’

Require emergency government spending (e.g. furlough, military aid) β†’

Tax receipts may fall during crises β†’

Sharp increase in fiscal deficits and jump in national debt.

Economic growth: Strong growth reduces fiscal deficits as tax revenue increases.
Government spending: High levels of spending, particularly on welfare and infrastructure, can increase deficits.
Taxation policies: Low tax rates or tax avoidance can increase deficits.
Interest rates: Higher interest rates increase the cost of servicing national debt, expanding the deficit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do macroeconomic policies respond to global issues?

A

Fiscal policy: Governments can use tax cuts or increased spending to stimulate economies during global recessions.
Monetary policy: Central banks may adjust interest rates to manage inflation and stabilize the economy.
Exchange rate policy: Managing exchange rates can help improve trade balances and stabilize currencies.
Supply-side policies: Improving productivity through investment in infrastructure, education, and technology.
Direct controls: Imposing regulations or restrictions to manage specific sectors (e.g., capital controls).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the measures to control global companies’ operations?

A

Regulation of transfer pricing: Ensuring that global companies pay fair taxes on profits made in different countries.
Limits to government control: Governments face challenges in controlling global companies due to their size, mobility, and influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the problems facing policymakers when applying macroeconomic policies?

A

Inaccurate information: Policymakers may make decisions based on incomplete or incorrect data.
Risks and uncertainties: Economic outcomes are uncertain, and policies may have unintended consequences.
Inability to control external shocks: Global events, like pandemics or financial crises, can disrupt national economies, limiting policy effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

examples of countries with low and high government spending

A

Lowest % of GDP (as of 2023):
US - 36%
India - 29%
South Africa - 33%

Highest:
France - 57%
UK - 44%
Italy - 54%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Reasons for Austerity in Some Countries after the 2008 Crisis

A

Rising Government Debt β†’ Budget Deficits Increase β†’ In the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, many governments implemented stimulus measures to support struggling economies, leading to an increase in public debt.
β†’ This surge in debt was financed by borrowing, pushing the government’s fiscal position into a deficit.
β†’ As debt levels rose, countries faced growing concerns over the sustainability of their finances, leading to pressure to reduce deficits.
β†’ Many governments sought to prevent debt defaults or avoid losing investor confidence, which could lead to higher borrowing costs.
β†’ Austerity measures, such as cuts in public spending and tax increases, were seen as necessary to bring deficits under control and reduce national debt levels.

Pressure from International Institutions β†’ IMF and EU Influence β†’ After the crisis, countries like Greece, Spain, and Portugal sought financial assistance from international institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Union (EU).
β†’ These organizations conditioned their financial aid on the implementation of austerity measures to ensure that countries would not default on loans.
β†’ Austerity was seen as a way to demonstrate fiscal responsibility and to restore market confidence in the ability of governments to manage their finances.
β†’ The IMF and EU argued that austerity would help countries regain economic stability and reduce long-term debt burdens.
β†’ While the effectiveness of austerity was debated, it was viewed as a necessary step to secure external financial support.

Preventing Inflation and Currency Depreciation β†’ Maintaining Economic Stability β†’ In countries facing significant debt levels, austerity was considered a way to prevent inflation and stabilize the economy.
β†’ Governments feared that increased spending or failure to cut debt could lead to currency depreciation or hyperinflation, which could make the debt even harder to manage.
β†’ By reducing fiscal deficits, austerity aimed to restore market confidence in the currency, keeping inflationary pressures in check.
β†’ Countries like Greece, for example, feared that without austerity measures, their economies would be unable to maintain currency stability or preserve their credit ratings.
β†’ This approach was aimed at fostering long-term economic stability, which was thought to be essential for recovery.

Political Pressure and Public Perception β†’ Commitment to Fiscal Discipline β†’ Governments faced intense political pressure to demonstrate their commitment to fiscal discipline and to avoid taxpayer-funded bailouts.
β†’ There was a strong desire to restore trust with taxpayers and voters who were concerned about the increasing cost of government debt.
β†’ Politicians argued that austerity measures would help prevent future fiscal crises and ensure that governments could live within their means.
β†’ Public perception was crucial; governments needed to convince voters that austerity was essential to avoid more severe economic problems in the future.
β†’ By focusing on cutting spending and raising taxes, governments hoped to restore confidence and show that they were taking responsibility for the national economy.

Long-term Economic Recovery β†’ Structural Reforms β†’ Governments believed that austerity would help achieve long-term economic recovery by implementing structural reforms to improve the efficiency of public services.
β†’ These reforms included reducing government spending in areas such as welfare, public sector wages, and social services, which were seen as unsustainable in the long run.
β†’ Austerity was also tied to efforts to improve competitiveness by pushing for labor market reforms and reducing the size of the public sector.
β†’ The argument was that cutting public spending would lead to higher private sector growth, allowing economies to recover more quickly and sustainably.
β†’ Proponents of austerity believed that without such reforms, countries would continue to be trapped in a cycle of low growth and high debt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Reasons Countries with an Aging Population Have Higher Government Spending

A

1️⃣ More Elderly People β†’ Higher Pension Payments β†’ Rising Fiscal Pressure β†’ Need for Higher Taxes or More Borrowing
A larger retired population means more people are claiming state pensions while fewer workers are paying taxes to fund them.

Governments must increase pension spending to support an aging population, leading to higher fiscal pressure.

To finance rising pension costs, governments may need to raise taxes, cut spending elsewhere, or borrow more.

If borrowing increases significantly, national debt rises, potentially leading to higher future tax burdens or spending cuts.

πŸ“Œ Evaluation: Governments can increase the retirement age to reduce pension costs and keep more people in the workforce.

2️⃣ Aging Population β†’ Increased Demand for Healthcare β†’ Higher Public Health Spending β†’ Strain on NHS/Medicare Systems
Older people require more frequent and expensive healthcare treatments, such as for chronic diseases (e.g., diabetes, heart disease, dementia).

This leads to rising public healthcare costs, putting pressure on government budgets to expand hospitals, services, and staff.

If healthcare costs grow faster than tax revenue, governments may need to reallocate spending from other sectors (e.g., education, infrastructure).

Long-term care services (nursing homes, home care support) also become more expensive, increasing social care budgets.

πŸ“Œ Evaluation: Countries can invest in preventive healthcare to reduce long-term treatment costs.

3️⃣ Aging Workforce β†’ Labour Shortages β†’ Lower Tax Revenues β†’ Higher Public Debt or Austerity Measures
As more workers retire, the labour force shrinks, reducing income tax revenues that fund government spending.

A smaller workforce means less productivity, slowing economic growth and making it harder to generate tax revenue.

Governments may need to increase business and income taxes, which can discourage investment and economic growth.

Alternatively, they might cut public services (austerity policies), reducing the quality of public goods (e.g., education, infrastructure).

πŸ“Œ Evaluation: Countries can encourage immigration or increase labour force participation (e.g., by supporting working parents).

4️⃣ More Elderly Dependents β†’ Higher Demand for Social Care β†’ Rising Welfare Spending β†’ Pressure on Public Services
An aging population increases demand for elderly care services, such as home carers, nursing homes, and disability support.

Governments must spend more on social care programs, which diverts funds from education, transport, or housing.

If social care services are underfunded, families may need to provide unpaid care, reducing their ability to work and contribute to the economy.

Over time, this can lead to rising inequality, as lower-income families struggle to afford private elderly care services.

πŸ“Œ Evaluation: Promoting private pension schemes and social care insurance could help reduce public spending pressure.

5️⃣ Increased Dependency Ratio β†’ Higher Public Service Costs β†’ More Pressure on Working-Age Population β†’ Economic Slowdown
A rising dependency ratio (the number of non-working dependents per worker) puts greater financial pressure on the working-age population.

Governments must spend more on public goods and services (e.g., transport, housing, social benefits) while fewer people are paying taxes.

Higher government spending combined with slower tax revenue growth leads to budget deficits and long-term economic stagnation.

If deficits grow too large, governments may need to implement harsh fiscal policies (e.g., cutting pensions, raising retirement age).

πŸ“Œ Evaluation: Countries could invest in automation and AI to maintain productivity despite a shrinking workforce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is a fiscal/budget deficit

A

when government spending is greater than tax revenue in a year or given time periods

  • running a budget deficit suggests high gov spending/ low tax rev
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is a structural deficit

A

a budget/fiscal deficit at full employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is a cyclical deficit

A

a budget/fiscal deficit during a recession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

advantages of running a fiscal/budget deficit

A

1️⃣ Higher Growth, Lower Unemployment
A fiscal deficit means the government is injecting more spending into the economy than it collects in taxes.
This increases aggregate demand (AD) through higher government spending and lower taxes.
Higher AD leads to greater output and employment, as firms respond to increased demand by hiring more workers.
Multiplier effects can further boost GDP growth, creating a positive feedback loop of income and spending.
2️⃣ Benefits of Government Spending (Healthcare, Education, etc.)
A fiscal deficit allows the government to fund essential services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
Investing in human capital (education & training) improves long-term productivity, shifting LRAS rightward.
Better infrastructure (e.g., transport, digital connectivity) reduces business costs, increasing competitiveness.
These investments lead to higher future tax revenues, making the deficit more sustainable over time.
3️⃣ Redistribution of Income
Government spending on welfare programs (e.g., unemployment benefits, subsidies) helps low-income households.
This increases equity and social stability, reducing economic disparities.
Since low-income groups have a higher marginal propensity to consume (MPC), redistribution further stimulates AD.
Reducing inequality can also lead to higher social mobility and a more productive workforce.
4️⃣ Incentives of Tax Cuts
Running a deficit due to tax cuts increases disposable income for households and businesses.
Higher disposable income boosts consumer spending, further driving AD and economic growth.
Lower corporate taxes encourage business investment, leading to capital accumulation and innovation.
Over time, higher growth can lead to greater tax revenues, potentially reducing the deficit naturally.
5️⃣ Crowding In
If a fiscal deficit increases demand in an underutilized economy, private sector investment may rise rather than fall.
Higher government spending creates new opportunities for businesses, leading to more private sector confidence.
Stronger growth expectations encourage firms to expand production and hire more workers.
This effect, known as crowding in, suggests that deficits do not always lead to private sector displacement but can enhance overall economic activity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

disadvantages of running a fiscal/budget deficit

A

1️⃣ Deterioration of Government Finances
A fiscal deficit means the government is spending more than it earns, leading to higher national debt.
Increased borrowing leads to higher interest payments, reducing funds available for essential services like healthcare and education.
If debt levels become unsustainable, investors may lose confidence, causing higher borrowing costs (bond yields rise).
In extreme cases, governments may be forced to implement austerity measures, reducing growth and harming public welfare.
2️⃣ Inflation Conflict
Increased government spending or tax cuts boost aggregate demand (AD).
If the economy is close to full capacity, excess AD leads to demand-pull inflation, increasing the cost of living.
Higher inflation can reduce real wages, leading to lower consumer purchasing power.
To control inflation, the central bank may increase interest rates, which can reduce private sector investment and dampen growth.
3️⃣ Current Account Deficit Conflict
A fiscal deficit often leads to higher consumer spending, including on imports, as higher disposable incomes increase MPM
This increases demand for foreign goods, worsening the current account deficit (higher imports than exports).
A persistent current account deficit can lead to currency depreciation, making imports more expensive, further driving inflation.
If foreign investors lose confidence, there could be capital flight, further destabilizing the economy.
4️⃣ Crowding Out Effect
When the government borrows heavily, demand for loanable funds increases, leading to higher interest rates.
Higher interest rates make private sector borrowing more expensive, reducing investment and consumption.
This is known as crowding out, where public sector expansion reduces private sector activity, potentially lowering long-term growth.
In extreme cases, this could neutralize or even reverse the positive effects of government spending.
5️⃣ X-Inefficiency
Continuous government borrowing and spending can reduce the incentive to allocate resources efficiently.
Public sector projects may suffer from wasteful spending, where funds are misallocated to politically motivated or inefficient programs.
A reliance on deficit spending weakens pressure for structural reforms, leading to inefficiencies in government operations.
Over time, this can lower productivity and economic competitiveness, reducing the effectiveness of future government policies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
eval points for running a budget/fiscal deficit
State of Government Finances If the government has low existing debt, running a fiscal deficit may be sustainable, as it can borrow at low interest rates. eg UK at 2.4% However, if debt levels are already high, further borrowing may increase default risk, leading to higher borrowing costs. Higher debt servicing costs reduce fiscal flexibility, limiting future spending on essential public services. Countries with strong credit ratings (e.g., developed economies) can sustain deficits longer than economies with weaker financial positions. 2️⃣ Short vs. Long Term In the short run, a fiscal deficit can stimulate growth, reduce unemployment, and prevent economic downturns. However, in the long run, persistent deficits may increase debt burdens, causing higher interest payments and potential austerity measures. If spending is on capital investment (e.g., infrastructure, education, R&D), it can boost productivity and lead to higher future tax revenues, making the deficit more sustainable. If borrowing is used for current spending (e.g., welfare, subsidies), the long-term benefits may be limited, making future repayments more difficult. 3️⃣ Stage of the Economic Cycle During a recession, running a fiscal deficit can be highly beneficial as it boosts aggregate demand (AD) and prevents long-term stagnation. During a boom, a deficit may be inflationary, leading to higher interest rates and overheating. If a deficit is used to finance productive investments, it can smooth economic fluctuations, leading to more stable long-term growth. However, failing to reduce deficits during periods of strong growth may limit the ability to respond effectively to future downturns. 4️⃣ Business and Consumer Confidence If a fiscal deficit is seen as manageable, it can boost business confidence, leading to higher private investment and job creation. However, if investors fear government insolvency, borrowing costs may rise, leading to capital flight and currency depreciation. High confidence levels can result in a multiplier effect, amplifying the benefits of deficit spending. Low confidence levels can result in a paradox of thrift, where consumers and businesses save instead of spend, reducing the effectiveness of the deficit. 5️⃣ Automatic Stabilisers In a downturn, automatic stabilisers (e.g., higher welfare spending, lower tax revenues) naturally increase the fiscal deficit without discretionary policy changes. This helps to soften the impact of recessions, preventing extreme falls in GDP and employment. However, if a country relies too heavily on automatic stabilisers, it may become structurally dependent on deficit spending. In the long run, governments need to ensure that structural deficits (deficits that persist even in periods of growth) do not undermine fiscal sustainability.
26
budget surplus
tax rev > govt spending in a year
27
advantages of running a budget surplus/using contractionary fiscal policy
1️⃣ Confidence in Government Finances Running a budget surplus signals strong fiscal discipline, reassuring investors and international markets. This reduces borrowing costs, as the government is seen as less likely to default on its debt. Lower borrowing costs mean that the government can save on interest payments, freeing up resources for future spending or tax cuts. Increased confidence may also encourage foreign direct investment (FDI), boosting long-term economic growth. 2️⃣ Flexibility with Fiscal Policy A surplus provides the government with more options in the future, as it does not have to worry about high debt burdens. In the event of a recession, the government can use expansionary fiscal policy without fear of unsustainable debt accumulation. The ability to lower taxes or increase spending when needed gives policymakers more control over economic cycles. Countries with fiscal surpluses are also more likely to have higher credit ratings, which keeps borrowing costs low when they do need to borrow. 3️⃣ Less Crowding Out When the government runs a deficit, it borrows from the private sector, potentially reducing the availability of funds for private investment. A budget surplus means less government borrowing, allowing private firms easier access to capital at lower interest rates. This can lead to higher private sector investment, which can drive long-term economic growth. Reducing crowding out means that businesses can invest in capital, technology, and innovation, increasing productivity and competitiveness. 4️⃣ Less X-Inefficiency In times of fiscal surplus, the government has less pressure to raise taxes or cut spending inefficiently, reducing distortions in the economy. The private sector is often more efficient than government-run programs, meaning fewer resources are wasted on inefficient public spending. This can increase allocative and productive efficiency, as government resources are only used where they are most needed. Lower government intervention in markets may also encourage competition, reducing monopoly power and driving down prices. 5️⃣ Inflation Unlikely & Current Account Deficit Reduction Running a surplus means the government is withdrawing demand from the economy, reducing inflationary pressures. This keeps prices more stable, benefiting consumers and businesses by ensuring predictable costs. A government surplus often reduces the need for foreign borrowing, improving the trade balance and reducing the current account deficit. With lower inflation and a stronger trade position, the currency may appreciate, making imports cheaper and improving living standards.
28
disadvantages of running a budget surplus or using contractionary fiscal policy
1️⃣ Demand-Side Shock (Increased Unemployment, Lower Growth) Running a budget surplus often means higher taxes and/or lower government spending, which reduces aggregate demand (AD). Lower AD leads to lower economic growth, as firms experience weaker consumer demand for goods and services. Firms may respond by cutting production and reducing their workforce, increasing unemployment. If unemployment rises significantly, negative multiplier effects may occur, as unemployed workers spend less, further reducing consumption and investment. 2️⃣ General Macro & Micro Impacts of Increased Taxes Higher taxation reduces household disposable income, lowering consumption (C) in the economy. This reduces firm revenues, which can lead to lower business investment, slowing capital accumulation and innovation. If corporate taxes rise, firms may relocate operations abroad, reducing domestic job opportunities. In microeconomic terms, higher indirect taxes (e.g., VAT) increase costs for businesses, which may lead to higher prices for consumers (cost-push inflation). 3️⃣ Long-Run Returns of Increased Government Spending & Lower Tax Rates Cutting government spending to maintain a budget surplus may reduce investment in key sectors like infrastructure, healthcare, and education. Lower investment in these sectors harms long-run productivity growth, reducing the potential growth rate (LRAS shifts left). Similarly, lower tax rates can stimulate entrepreneurship and private sector investment, driving innovation and efficiency improvements. Therefore, prioritizing a budget surplus over strategic long-term investment may limit a country’s future economic potential. 4️⃣ Incentive Distortion of Increased Taxes If higher taxes are used to generate a budget surplus, this may distort incentives for work and investment. Higher income tax rates may create disincentives for individuals to work longer hours or seek higher-paying jobs, leading to lower productivity. Increased corporate taxes may reduce firms' willingness to invest, limiting capital stock growth and reducing competitiveness in global markets. In extreme cases, high tax burdens may encourage tax avoidance or evasion, reducing government tax revenues in the long run. 5️⃣ Risk of Income Inequality If government spending cuts affect welfare programs, public services, and subsidies, lower-income groups may suffer disproportionately. Reduced government support can worsen absolute poverty and limit social mobility, as low-income households struggle with affordability of education, healthcare, and housing. Austerity measures may increase regional inequalities, as poorer regions rely more on public sector spending for economic support. Rising inequality can lead to weaker social cohesion, lower overall well-being, and greater political instability, affecting long-term economic stability.
29
eval points for running a budget surplus/ contractionary policy
πŸ“ 1. Depends on Size of the Surplus β†’ Small Surplus β†’ Minimal AD Impact β†’ Growth Maintained A small budget surplus may only slightly reduce government spending β†’ The fall in AD might be minor β†’ Business and consumer confidence may remain strong β†’ Economic growth and development continue with little disruption πŸ§‘β€πŸ”§ 2. Depends on State of the Economy β†’ Near Full Capacity β†’ Reduces Overheating β†’ Controls Inflation If the economy is close to full employment β†’ Contractionary policy can ease inflationary pressures β†’ Stabilises the economy without drastically reducing output β†’ Improves long-term economic stability and purchasing power πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ 3. Depends on Source of the Surplus β†’ Structural Surplus (e.g. Germany) β†’ Confidence Signal β†’ Attracts Investment Surpluses from efficient tax collection and spending restraint (structural) β†’ Show strong government discipline and solvency β†’ May boost investor and credit market confidence β†’ Can crowd in investment and support growth in the long run 🧾 4. Depends on How the Surplus is Used β†’ Used for Debt Repayment β†’ Lower Future Interest Payments β†’ Increases Fiscal Space Surpluses used to pay down national debt β†’ Reduces future debt interest burden β†’ Frees up future government resources for investment or welfare β†’ Improves long-run growth and development prospects 🚨 5. Depends on Confidence Effects β†’ Households/Firms Expect Slowdown β†’ Cut Spending β†’ AD Falls More Than Expected Surplus may be seen as a sign of upcoming austerity or downturn β†’ Consumers and firms may reduce spending pre-emptively β†’ Confidence falls, leading to a larger than intended fall in AD β†’ Can trigger or deepen a recession, worsening unemployment
30
UK credit rating UK national debt
AA-, UK has never defaulted a loan, and credit ratings are historically biased around Β£2.8 trillion
31
country with good credit rating country with bad credit rating
Australia with AAA Burkina Faso with CCC
32
tax revenue for government
income tax largest proportion of tax revenue: >340 bn - corporation tax : > 58 bn - VAT : > 135bn - business rate tax : > 31bn - capital tax: > 30bn
33
advantages of a flat tax
πŸ’Ό 1. Simpler Tax System β†’ Lower Administrative Costs β†’ Greater Compliance β†’ Efficiency Gains A flat tax applies the same rate to all income levels β†’ Simplifies tax calculations and reduces complexity β†’ Cuts down costs for governments and taxpayers in compliance and enforcement β†’ Improves tax efficiency and may reduce tax evasion πŸ“ˆ 2. Incentivises Work and Investment β†’ Increases Labour Supply and Entrepreneurship β†’ Boosts Output Flat tax means marginal tax rates don’t increase with income β†’ Encourages individuals to work more or invest without fear of higher taxes β†’ Supports greater labour participation and entrepreneurial activity β†’ Can lead to long-term economic growth πŸ’Έ 3. Attracts Foreign Investment β†’ Competitive Tax Environment β†’ FDI Inflows Increase A flat and predictable tax rate makes a country more attractive to foreign investors β†’ Encourages multinational firms to locate operations there β†’ Leads to job creation and technology transfer β†’ Supports both growth and development in the host country 🏦 4. Reduces Tax Avoidance and Evasion β†’ Higher Effective Revenue β†’ More Fiscal Stability Flat taxes are less distortive and offer fewer loopholes β†’ Reduces incentives for tax planning or shifting income to avoid tax β†’ Increases effective tax collection β†’ Improves government revenue and fiscal stability over time
34
what is a flat tax
a single percentage income tax rate applied to all taxpayers regardless of income
35
disadvantages of a flat tax
πŸ”Ή Microeconomic Disadvantages 1️⃣ Regressive Effect – Increased Income Inequality A flat tax applies the same rate to all incomes, meaning low-income earners pay a higher proportion of their disposable income compared to high earners. This reduces their ability to afford essential goods and services, leading to lower living standards for the poorest in society. As income inequality rises, there may be greater social tensions, increasing pressure for welfare spending or tax reforms. 2️⃣ Reduction in Government Revenue for Public Services Progressive tax systems allow governments to collect more revenue from high earners, which helps fund education, healthcare, and welfare programs. A flat tax often reduces total tax revenue, leading to cuts in essential public services that benefit lower-income groups the most. Over time, underfunded infrastructure and public services can reduce overall economic efficiency and productivity. Reduced Incentives for Work Among Low Earners Without lower tax bands or exemptions for low-income workers β†’ Flat tax may reduce post-tax earnings for the poorest β†’ This weakens the incentive to enter or remain in the workforce β†’ May increase dependency on benefits and reduce labour market participation. πŸ”Ή Macroeconomic Disadvantages 5️⃣ Worsened Income Distribution and Lower Social Mobility With wealthier individuals benefiting more from a flat tax system, wealth concentration increases over time. This can lead to reduced opportunities for low-income individuals, as government investment in education and social mobility programs declines. Over time, widening inequality can reduce economic stability and increase demand for redistributive policies. 6️⃣ Potential Budget Deficits or Need for Spending Cuts If the flat tax leads to lower overall government revenue, the government may need to cut spending on public goods or increase borrowing. If spending is cut in areas like education and infrastructure, long-run economic growth may suffer due to lower productivity. If borrowing increases, this may lead to higher debt servicing costs, crowding out other areas of government spending. 7️⃣ Negative Impact on Consumer Spending and Aggregate Demand If a flat tax increases the tax burden on middle- and lower-income households, consumer spending falls, as they have a higher marginal propensity to consume. Lower consumer spending reduces aggregate demand (AD), leading to lower short-run economic growth. If businesses see weaker demand, they may reduce investment, slowing down long-run growth potential. 8️⃣ Risk of Fiscal Instability in Economic Downturns Progressive tax systems act as an automatic stabilizerβ€”when incomes fall, tax payments fall proportionally, softening the impact of recessions. A flat tax reduces this stabilizing effect, making economic downturns more severe as government revenue falls sharply. Without sufficient fiscal flexibility, the government may have to raise taxes or cut spending during a downturn, making the recession even worse. 9️⃣ Less Room for Targeted Fiscal Policy Progressive tax systems allow governments to adjust tax bands and deductions to address specific economic or social issues. A flat tax removes this flexibility, making it harder to implement targeted fiscal policies during economic crises. Governments may have fewer policy tools to respond to macroeconomic shocks, leading to greater instability.
36
advantages of increasing **direct** tax
πŸ’° 1. Increases Government Revenue β†’ More Public Investment β†’ Boosts Long-Term Growth Higher direct taxes (like income/corporation tax) raise revenue β†’ Government has more funds to invest in healthcare, education, or infrastructure β†’ Improves productivity and human capital in the long run β†’ Supports sustainable economic growth and development πŸ“‰ 2. Helps Reduce Budget Deficit β†’ Lower Borrowing β†’ Improves Fiscal Stability Increased direct tax receipts reduce reliance on borrowing β†’ Cuts down the budget deficit β†’ Improves government credit rating and reduces debt interest payments β†’ Creates long-term fiscal space for counter-cyclical policy βš–οΈ 3. Promotes Income Redistribution β†’ Reduces Inequality β†’ Supports Inclusive Development Progressive direct taxes (e.g. higher income tax on the wealthy) reduce income disparities β†’ Government can redistribute income through welfare schemes or public services β†’ Increases access to opportunities for low-income households β†’ Supports equitable development and reduces social unrest πŸ“Š 4. Helps Control Demand-Pull Inflation β†’ Slower Consumption β†’ AD Stabilised Higher direct taxes reduce disposable income β†’ Consumers cut back on spending β†’ This can help reduce excess demand in the economy β†’ Keeps inflation under control and stabilises the macroeconomic environment
37
disadvantages of increasing **direct taxes**
πŸ§β€β™‚οΈ 1. Disincentive to Work β†’ Lower Labour Supply β†’ Lower Output β†’ Slower Growth Higher income tax reduces the post-tax reward for working β†’ May discourage individuals from working extra hours or entering the workforce β†’ Labour supply and productivity fall β†’ Reduces potential output and GDP growth 🏒 2. Reduced Investment β†’ Slower Capital Accumulation β†’ Lower Productivity β†’ Weaker Long-Term Growth Higher corporation tax lowers retained profits for firms β†’ Reduces internal funds available for investment in capital and innovation β†’ Slows improvements in productivity β†’ Damages long-term supply-side growth 🌍 3. Capital Flight Risk β†’ Lower Investment β†’ Currency Depreciation β†’ External Instability High direct taxes may encourage wealthy individuals and firms to move capital abroad β†’ Reduces domestic investment and weakens financial markets β†’ Capital outflows can cause currency depreciation β†’ Leads to inflation and macroeconomic instability πŸ“‰ 4. Reduced Disposable Income β†’ Lower Consumption β†’ Negative Multiplier β†’ Lower Real GDP Households have less income after tax β†’ Consumption, a key component of AD, falls β†’ Triggers a negative multiplier effect β†’ Slows economic growth and worsens living standards πŸ“‰ 5. Impact on Business Confidence β†’ Delayed Expansion β†’ Slower Job Creation β†’ Development Impact Tax hikes signal a less business-friendly environment β†’ Firms may delay expansion or hiring β†’ Reduces employment opportunities β†’ Slows improvements in living standards and worsens poverty
38
advantages of raising indirect taxes
πŸ”Ή Macroeconomic Advantages 6️⃣ Boosting Government Revenue Without Raising Direct Tax Rates Raising indirect taxes provides a way for the government to increase revenue without the need to increase direct taxes like income or corporate taxes, which could negatively impact incentives to work or invest. This additional revenue can be used to fund government programs without worsening the economy's overall tax burden. 7️⃣ Encouraging Domestic Production of Goods Higher taxes on imports (such as import tariffs) make imported goods more expensive, encouraging consumers to purchase domestic goods instead. This can stimulate the domestic economy, promote local production, and reduce reliance on foreign goods, which can help improve the trade balance (reducing the current account deficit). 8️⃣ Addressing Market Failures and Externalities By raising indirect taxes on goods that cause negative externalities, such as pollution or unhealthy food products, governments can use taxes as a tool to internalize the cost of these externalities. This leads to more efficient market outcomes, as the prices of harmful goods reflect the social cost of their consumption, ultimately reducing their negative impact on society. 9️⃣ Demand Management and Economic Stabilization Raising indirect taxes can be used as a tool to manage inflation or reduce excess demand in an overheated economy. By increasing the prices of goods, consumer spending may decrease, leading to lower demand-pull inflation. This can be particularly useful during periods of economic overheating or when an economy is experiencing unsustainable growth.
39
disadvantages of raising indirect taxes
🧺 1. Regressive Impact β†’ Disproportionately Affects Low-Income Households β†’ Worsens Inequality β†’ Reduces Development Indirect taxes (like VAT) are charged at the same rate regardless of income β†’ Low-income households spend a larger proportion of their income on taxed goods β†’ Increases income inequality and reduces disposable income for the poor β†’ Hinders inclusive development and worsens living standards πŸ“‰ 2. Reduced Consumer Spending β†’ Lower Aggregate Demand β†’ Slower Economic Growth Higher indirect taxes increase the final price of goods and services β†’ Reduces real purchasing power and consumption, especially for essentials β†’ Falls in consumer demand reduce aggregate demand (AD) β†’ May lead to lower GDP growth, especially in consumer-driven economies 🏭 3. Higher Costs for Firms β†’ Reduced Competitiveness β†’ Fall in Exports/Output Indirect taxes increase the cost of raw materials and intermediate goods β†’ Raises firms' costs, especially in manufacturing and export industries β†’ Reduces international price competitiveness β†’ Can lead to job losses and lower productive capacity πŸ” 4. Cost-Push Inflation β†’ Lower Real Incomes β†’ Wage-Price Spiral Risk Tax-induced price increases (e.g., VAT hikes) raise the general price level β†’ Real incomes fall as wages lag behind price rises β†’ May trigger wage demands, increasing costs for businesses again β†’ Leads to persistent inflation and economic instability
40
what is VAT
an indirect tax which is regressive. is at 20%
41
corporation tax rate capital gains tax
19%, lowered from 20% 32% from apr 2025
42
other factors affecting levels of FDI
πŸ’· 1. Wage Rates Lower wage rates reduce production costs for labour-intensive firms β†’ Increases profit margins for MNCs in sectors like textiles or manufacturing β†’ Makes host country more attractive for FDI seeking cost-efficiency β†’ Leads to relocation of production from high-wage to low-wage economies 🧠 2. Labour Skills / Human Capital A skilled workforce improves productivity and quality of output β†’ Attracts FDI in high-tech or knowledge-intensive industries (e.g., IT, biotech) β†’ Reduces training costs and risk of operational inefficiency β†’ Encourages long-term investment in human capital-rich economies 🏦 3. Tax Rates Lower corporation tax increases post-tax profitability of investment β†’ Acts as a financial incentive for MNCs to locate in low-tax jurisdictions β†’ Can create tax competition between countries to attract FDI β†’ Too low, however, may raise concerns over sustainability or fairness πŸ›£οΈ 4. Transport and Infrastructure Efficient infrastructure (roads, ports, telecoms) reduces logistical delays β†’ Enables smoother supply chains and access to domestic & global markets β†’ Increases investor confidence in operational efficiency β†’ Poor infrastructure can deter FDI due to higher delivery costs and delays πŸ“ˆ 5. Size of Economy / Growth Potential Large or rapidly growing economies offer greater market size β†’ Increases demand for goods/services β†’ higher expected returns on investment β†’ Attracts FDI aiming to access consumer markets (e.g., India, Brazil) β†’ Small or stagnant economies may be overlooked by market-seeking FDI πŸ—³οΈ 6. Political Stability / Property Rights Political instability increases risk of expropriation or abrupt policy changes β†’ Undermines investor confidence and deters long-term FDI β†’ Strong legal systems and enforceable property rights build trust β†’ Countries with rule of law attract more consistent and higher-value FDI ⛏️ 7. Availability of Commodities / Natural Resources Resource-rich countries attract FDI in extraction industries (oil, minerals) β†’ Offers secure access to vital inputs for global production β†’ However, may lead to "resource curse" if poorly managed β†’ Strategic resource access can drive vertical integration of MNCs πŸ’± 8. Exchange Rate Stability and Value Stable exchange rates reduce currency risk for foreign investors β†’ Depreciated local currency reduces relative cost of investment β†’ But fear of further depreciation may increase repatriation risk β†’ Volatile or overvalued currencies may deter FDI due to uncertainty 🏭 9. Clustering and Agglomeration Economies FDI is attracted to areas with existing industry clusters (e.g., Silicon Valley) β†’ Benefits from shared suppliers, labour pools, and innovation spillovers β†’ Reduces start-up risks and encourages collaboration β†’ Lack of clusters may increase operational and recruitment difficulties 🌍 10. Access to Free Trade / Trade Agreements Being in a customs union or FTA (e.g., EU, USMCA) gives access to wider markets β†’ Encourages "tariff-jumping" FDI seeking to bypass trade barriers β†’ Facilitates export-oriented investment and supply chain integration β†’ Protectionist regimes may discourage FDI due to restricted market access
43
what is transfer pricing
refers to the practice of determining the price at which goods or services are bought and sold between related companies, such as subsidiaries of the same multinational corporation operating in different countries
44
whats the objective of transfer pricing
to allocate the profits earned by the multinational corporation among its different subsidiaries, based on the value they contribute to the overall business.
45
Measures to Control Global Companies’ Operations – Chains of Analysis
1️⃣ Governments can enforce antitrust laws to prevent monopolies or abusive practices by large global firms β†’ Protects local SMEs from being driven out of the market β†’ Encourages competition, innovation, and efficient resource allocation β†’ Promotes long-term inclusive development and economic diversification πŸ“Œ Evaluation: Some MNCs operate in multiple jurisdictions, making enforcement of competition laws difficult without global cooperation. 2️⃣ Tax Regulations & Corporate Taxation β†’ Reduce Profit Shifting β†’ Ensure Fair Tax Contributions β†’ Boost Government Revenue Global companies often shift profits to low-tax countries (e.g., through transfer pricing). Governments implement minimum corporate tax rates (e.g., OECD’s Global Minimum Tax at 15%) to prevent tax avoidance. This increases government revenue, which can be reinvested into public services and infrastructure. Reducing tax avoidance also creates a level playing field between MNCs and domestic businesses. πŸ“Œ Evaluation: If tax rates are too high, firms may relocate headquarters to tax-friendly jurisdictions, reducing the effectiveness of such policies. 3️⃣ Environmental & Labour Regulations β†’ Prevent Exploitation β†’ Improve Working & Environmental Standards β†’ Enhance Sustainability Governments impose stricter labour laws to prevent poor working conditions and exploitation in factories. Environmental laws (e.g., carbon taxes, pollution limits) ensure companies reduce negative externalities like emissions. This leads to more ethical and sustainable business practices, benefiting both workers and the environment. Companies that comply with these regulations may benefit from stronger brand reputation and consumer loyalty. πŸ“Œ Evaluation: If regulations are too strict, MNCs may offshore production to countries with weaker environmental and labour laws. 4️⃣ Trade Policies & Tariffs β†’ Limit Market Dominance β†’ Protect Domestic Industries β†’ Maintain Economic Sovereignty Governments impose tariffs and quotas to prevent MNCs from undercutting domestic firms through low-cost production. This protects local industries, ensuring job security and economic stability in certain sectors. It prevents over-reliance on global companies, reducing risks associated with foreign control of key industries. Ensuring economic sovereignty allows nations to shape their own industrial policies without excessive foreign influence. πŸ“Œ Evaluation: Overprotection can lead to reduced competition, making domestic firms inefficient and less innovative. 5️⃣ International Agreements & Cooperation β†’ Strengthen Global Oversight β†’ Prevent Exploitation β†’ Standardise Regulations Bodies like the United Nations (UN), WTO, and IMF enforce international agreements to regulate MNC behaviour. Agreements on corporate responsibility, climate change, and fair trade prevent companies from exploiting regulatory loopholes. This ensures global fairness, reducing the race to the bottom, where countries compete by lowering standards. Standardised regulations make it harder for MNCs to bypass rules through legal loopholes. πŸ“Œ Evaluation: International cooperation can be slow, as different nations have conflicting economic interests.
46
what is a bilateral agreement
when aid is given from one government to another government
47
what is a multilateral agreement
when aid is diverted through an international organisation eg IMF - theyll then decide who needs aid the most then the aid will be distributed between those who need it the most
48
why are taxes used
πŸ’° 1. Raise government revenue Governments impose taxes on goods, income, or profits β†’ This provides the state with essential funding β†’ Revenue is used to finance public goods like healthcare, education, and defence β†’ Improves social welfare and economic stability πŸ₯πŸ“š 🧾 2. Correct market failure (e.g. negative externalities) A tax can be placed on demerit goods like cigarettes or petrol β†’ This internalises the external cost of consumption/production β†’ Leads to higher prices and lower quantity demanded β†’ Helps bring the market closer to the socially optimum level βš–οΈ πŸ’Έ 3. Redistribute income and reduce inequality Progressive taxes take a higher proportion from higher incomes β†’ Allows redistribution through welfare payments and public services β†’ Reduces income and wealth inequality β†’ Promotes social cohesion and inclusive growth πŸ§β€β™€οΈπŸ§β€β™‚οΈ πŸ“‰ 4. Manage demand in the economy (fiscal policy) Higher taxes reduce disposable income β†’ Consumption falls, reducing aggregate demand β†’ Helps control demand-pull inflation during boom periods β†’ Used as a stabilisation tool in macroeconomic management πŸ“Š
49
advantages of TNCs
πŸ’Ό 1. Job creation TNCs set up production plants or offices in host countries β†’ Local workers are employed across various skill levels β†’ Incomes rise, improving living standards β†’ Reduces unemployment and stimulates local economies πŸ’Έ 2. Increased investment and infrastructure TNCs often invest in roads, energy, and communications to support their operations β†’ Improves national infrastructure for both firms and citizens β†’ Attracts further foreign and domestic investment β†’ Boosts long-term economic growth potential πŸ“ˆ 3. Technology and skill transfer TNCs introduce advanced production techniques and training β†’ Local workers and firms gain knowledge and skills β†’ Increases labour productivity and innovation β†’ Supports the development of human capital in the long run 🌍 4. Improved access to global markets TNCs integrate host countries into global supply chains β†’ Domestic firms can become suppliers or partners β†’ Encourages specialisation and export-led growth β†’ Improves the balance of payments over time
50
disadvantages of TNCs
βš–οΈ 1. Exploitation of labour TNCs may seek to lower costs by paying low wages in poorer countries β†’ Workers may face poor working conditions and limited rights β†’ Increases income inequality and worker dissatisfaction β†’ Limits long-term social and economic development πŸ’° 2. Repatriation of profits Profits made in the host country are often sent back to the TNC’s home country β†’ Reduces the money circulating within the domestic economy β†’ Limits tax revenue and reinvestment in local development β†’ Hinders sustainable economic growth 🏭 3. Environmental degradation TNCs may exploit natural resources with limited regulation β†’ Leads to pollution, deforestation, and habitat destruction β†’ Harms public health and long-term ecological sustainability β†’ Increases the burden on governments to clean up damage 🧠 4. Limited technology diffusion TNCs might use technology without sharing key expertise β†’ Local firms struggle to compete or innovate independently β†’ Host country remains dependent on foreign knowledge β†’ Slows down industrial and technological development
51
features of the Nordic model
πŸ›οΈ 1. Strong welfare state The government provides universal benefits like healthcare, education, and pensions β†’ Improves human capital and reduces inequality β†’ Increases labour productivity and social cohesion β†’ Boosts long-term economic growth and stability 🀝 2. High union density and cooperation Strong trade unions cooperate with employers and government in wage-setting β†’ Leads to wage compression and reduced income inequality β†’ Maintains industrial peace and labour market flexibility β†’ Increases trust and resilience during economic shocks πŸ’Ό 3. Active labour market policies Government provides retraining, job search support, and unemployment insurance β†’ Reduces structural unemployment and helps workers transition between jobs β†’ Increases workforce adaptability to economic changes β†’ Maintains high employment levels and productivity πŸ’Έ 4. High taxation to fund public services Progressive taxes on income and consumption fund generous public services β†’ Redistributes income and funds high-quality infrastructure β†’ Encourages social mobility and reduces poverty β†’ Can increase long-run efficiency by correcting market failures
52
USA vs Nordic model
πŸ§‘β€βš•οΈ 1. Welfare Provision Nordic: Universal welfare services like healthcare, education, and childcare β†’ Increases human capital and equality of opportunity β†’ Reduces poverty and improves living standards β†’ Boosts long-run growth through a healthier, educated workforce USA: Targeted welfare and largely private healthcare β†’ Lower public spending but higher inequality β†’ May reduce access to healthcare/education for low-income groups β†’ Could harm long-term productivity and social mobility πŸ’° 2. Taxation Nordic: High progressive taxes on income and consumption β†’ Funds generous welfare programs β†’ Reduces post-tax income inequality β†’ But may disincentivise high earners or FDI if taxes are seen as excessive USA: Lower taxes and more tax competition β†’ Encourages entrepreneurship and higher post-tax income β†’ But limited public funding for social programs β†’ Greater income inequality and underinvestment in public goods πŸ§‘β€πŸ”§ 3. Labour Market Structure Nordic: Coordinated wage bargaining and strong unions β†’ Wage compression and low inequality β†’ High trust and fewer strikes β†’ May reduce reward for top talent or innovation USA: Flexible labour markets with weaker unions β†’ Greater wage differentials and β€œhire and fire” culture β†’ Encourages competition and high rewards β†’ But can increase job insecurity and working poverty πŸ“Š 4. Income Inequality & Social Mobility Nordic: Low income inequality and high social mobility β†’ Strong safety nets and access to services β†’ Reduces crime and increases social cohesion USA: High income inequality and lower social mobility β†’ Education and healthcare often depend on income β†’ Can entrench poverty across generations
53
disadvantages of high national debt
πŸ’Έ 1. Higher Interest Payments As national debt increases, the government must pay more interest on its debt β†’ These interest payments become a larger portion of government expenditure β†’ Leaving less room for public investment in areas like infrastructure, healthcare, and education β†’ Limiting long-term economic growth and the government’s ability to stimulate the economy. 🏦 2. Crowding Out of Private Investment When the government borrows heavily, it competes with the private sector for loanable funds β†’ This increases interest rates, making borrowing more expensive for businesses β†’ Firms may reduce investment in capital, R&D, or expansion β†’ Slowing down productivity growth and economic development. βš–οΈ 3. Reduced Fiscal Flexibility A high national debt limits the government’s ability to respond to future economic crises (e.g. recessions or natural disasters) β†’ With large debt obligations, governments may be forced to implement austerity measures β†’ Cutting essential public services or increasing taxes β†’ Reducing social welfare and potentially causing public unrest. 🏚️ 4. Risk of Sovereign Debt Crisis If national debt becomes unsustainable, investors may lose confidence and demand higher interest rates β†’ This increases the likelihood of a sovereign debt crisis, where the government cannot meet its debt obligations β†’ Leading to defaults or restructuring, damaging the country’s credit rating β†’ Spelling further economic instability, loss of investor confidence, and potential for recession.
54
structural and cyclical reasons for a deficit
STRUCTURAL: 🏭 1. High Government Spending Some governments have a high level of expenditure on welfare, public services, and infrastructure β†’ Structural factors like an aging population can lead to increased spending on pensions and healthcare β†’ This creates a persistent gap between government revenue and expenditure β†’ Leading to a structural budget deficit that doesn’t disappear even during periods of economic growth. πŸ’Έ 2. Insufficient Tax Revenue If a country’s tax system is inefficient or poorly designed, it may fail to generate sufficient revenue β†’ For example, high levels of tax evasion, low tax rates on capital, or informal economies β†’ This leads to a chronic shortfall in government income β†’ Contributing to a structural deficit as the government continually spends more than it collects. 🏚️ 3. Dependence on Borrowing Some governments rely heavily on borrowing to finance long-term projects or cover gaps in income β†’ This dependence on debt may stem from historical budget deficits or a lack of alternative funding sources β†’ Over time, interest payments on debt can become a significant part of government expenditure β†’ Sustaining a structural deficit as borrowing to finance the deficit becomes a routine method of operation. πŸ›οΈ 4. Economic Structure and Development Model In some economies, there’s a structural reliance on industries or sectors with low profitability or limited tax revenue potential β†’ For instance, reliance on agriculture or basic manufacturing in developing economies may result in lower tax yields β†’ This can perpetuate low revenue generation, contributing to a consistent structural budget deficit β†’ Which is hard to resolve without major structural shifts in the economy. CYCLICAL: πŸ“‰ 1. Economic Recession During a recession, economic output falls, and unemployment rises β†’ This leads to lower tax revenues as businesses earn less and fewer people are employed β†’ Simultaneously, government spending on welfare, unemployment benefits, and stimulus increases β†’ Creating a cyclical budget deficit that typically improves once the economy recovers. πŸ’Ό 2. Reduced Consumer and Business Confidence In times of economic uncertainty, both consumers and businesses cut back on spending β†’ This results in lower demand for goods and services, leading to lower tax receipts β†’ At the same time, government spending may rise to stimulate the economy (e.g., stimulus packages, public works) β†’ Causing a temporary cyclical budget deficit until confidence is restored and the economy picks up. 🏚️ 3. Falling Tax Revenue During Economic Downturns Economic downturns result in reduced incomes and corporate profits β†’ This reduces the overall tax base, leading to lower government revenue from income tax, VAT, and corporate tax β†’ In contrast, government spending on social benefits and support programs often rises β†’ Leading to a cyclical deficit that is expected to resolve once economic growth resumes. πŸ›οΈ 4. Increased Government Spending on Stabilization Measures Governments may increase public spending during economic slowdowns to stimulate demand (e.g., through infrastructure projects or social support) β†’ These measures are intended to boost economic activity and reduce unemployment β†’ However, they often lead to higher short-term government expenditure, especially if tax revenue is falling β†’ Resulting in a cyclical budget deficit that is expected to close once the economy recovers.
55
problems facing policymakers when making policies
πŸ“Š 1. Inaccurate Information Governments base policy decisions on economic data such as GDP, inflation, and unemployment β†’ If data is outdated, misreported, or incomplete, it can lead to poor policy choices β†’ For example, underestimating inflation might result in interest rates being kept too low β†’ This could overstimulate demand and worsen inflation, undermining macroeconomic stability ⚠️ 2. Risks and Uncertainties Economic agents may behave unpredictably in response to policy changes β†’ For instance, consumers might save instead of spending after a tax cut if confidence is low β†’ This uncertainty limits the effectiveness of demand-side policies like fiscal stimulus β†’ It makes it harder for governments to achieve desired outcomes, such as boosting AD or employment 🌍 3. Inability to Control External Shocks Policymakers often can’t prevent global events like oil price spikes, financial crises, or pandemics β†’ Such shocks can cause supply-side inflation or reduce exports and investment flows β†’ For example, an oil price shock may raise production costs and inflation, making monetary policy less effective β†’ This reduces the ability of domestic policies to maintain stable growth, employment, and living standards
56
factors affecting size of fiscal deficit
πŸ’° Economic Growth Rate β†’ Fiscal Deficit Slower economic growth reduces tax revenues from income, profits, and consumption β†’ Government collects less revenue but may need to spend more on welfare and stimulus β†’ Budget deficit widens as expenditure exceeds revenue β†’ Fiscal deficit size increases πŸ“‰ Government Spending Levels β†’ Fiscal Deficit Higher government spending on public services, welfare, or infrastructure β†’ Increases total government expenditure without immediate revenue increase β†’ Budget deficit grows if tax revenue doesn’t rise correspondingly β†’ Larger fiscal deficit results πŸ”Ί Interest Rates on Government Debt β†’ Fiscal Deficit Rising interest rates increase the cost of servicing existing government debt β†’ More government revenue diverted to interest payments rather than public services β†’ Higher expenditure without revenue growth widens budget deficit β†’ Fiscal deficit expands πŸ”„ Automatic Stabilizers (Unemployment Benefits, Welfare) β†’ Fiscal Deficit In economic downturns, more people claim benefits, increasing government spending automatically β†’ Tax revenues fall due to lower incomes and profits β†’ Automatic stabilizers increase expenditure and reduce revenue simultaneously β†’ Fiscal deficit naturally grows during recessions
57
factors affecting size of national debt
πŸ’Έ Persistent Fiscal Deficits β†’ National Debt If a government runs frequent or large budget deficits β†’ It must borrow to cover the shortfall, usually by issuing government bonds β†’ Each year’s deficit adds to the total stock of debt β†’ Over time, the national debt increases πŸ“ˆ Interest Rates on Existing Debt β†’ National Debt Rising interest rates increase the cost of servicing existing government debt β†’ Government must borrow more to meet interest payments if revenues don't increase β†’ This adds to the debt stock, especially with compound interest β†’ National debt grows faster πŸ₯ Aging Population β†’ National Debt Older populations increase pressure on public pensions and healthcare services β†’ Government spending rises without matching tax revenue β†’ Leads to long-term structural deficits and more borrowing β†’ National debt increases steadily over time 🌍 Economic Growth Rate β†’ National Debt (as % of GDP) Slower or negative economic growth reduces tax revenues β†’ Government struggles to reduce deficits or pay off debt β†’ Debt-to-GDP ratio rises even if borrowing stays constant β†’ National debt appears larger relative to economic output πŸ’Ό Bailouts, Crises, and Emergency Spending β†’ National Debt Financial crises or wars often require huge, unplanned spending (e.g. COVID-19) β†’ Governments borrow heavily to fund stimulus, healthcare, or bailouts β†’ Short-term spikes in borrowing lead to large increases in national debt β†’ National debt rises sharply in the aftermath of crises
58
what are direct controls
government interventions that directly impact specific goods, services, or Examples of Direct Controls: Price controls: Maximum prices (price ceilings) or minimum prices (price floors) on goods or services. Quotas: Limits on the amount of goods that can be imported or exported. Regulations: Rules and guidelines that govern the production, pricing, and distribution of goods. Minimum wage laws: Setting a minimum wage for labor. Objectives of Direct Controls: Preventing inflation: Direct controls can be used to control prices and prevent excessive price increases. Correcting market failures: Direct controls can be used to address issues like externalities (e.g., pollution) or to ensure a more equitable distribution of resources. Promoting specific industries: Direct controls can be used to encourage investment in particular sectors or to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Examples of situations where direct controls might be used: Controlling inflation during a crisis: Governments might impose price controls on essential goods to prevent price gouging during a crisis like a natural disaster. Protecting consumers: Minimum wage laws aim to protect low-wage workers by setting a minimum acceptable wage. Addressing environmental concerns: Regulations on pollution emissions can help protect the environment. Potential Drawbacks of Direct Controls: Distortions in the market: Direct controls can create inefficiencies and disincentives for producers and consumers. Black markets: Price ceilings, for example, can lead to the development of black markets if the price is set too low. Bureaucracy: Implementing and enforcing direct controls can be costly and bureaucratic.
59
what is transfer pricing
Transfer pricing is when TNCs manipulate prices of intra-firm transactions to shift profits to low-tax countries. Governments regulate this using transparency rules and audits.
60
impacts on high national debt
1️⃣ πŸ“ˆ Higher Debt Interest Payments β†’ Opportunity Cost Large national debt β†’ government must allocate more revenue to interest payments β†’ UK debt interest hit ~Β£100bn in 2023 (ONS) β†’ less available for public services (e.g., NHS, education) β†’ Reduced investment in human capital/infrastructure β†’ long-term development hindered β†’ Slower improvements in living standards 2️⃣ πŸ“‰ Crowding Out of Private Investment To finance debt, government borrows by selling bonds β†’ increases demand for loanable funds β†’ Raises interest rates in capital markets (especially if demand is inelastic) β†’ Private firms face higher borrowing costs β†’ reduced investment in productive capacity β†’ Long-run growth and job creation fall 3️⃣ 🧾 Pressure to Raise Taxes or Cut Spending Persistent high debt β†’ government may raise taxes or reduce spending to balance budget β†’ Higher taxes reduce disposable income and consumption β†’ AD falls β†’ Cuts to welfare or education worsen inequality and reduce long-term development outcomes 4️⃣ ⚠️ Reduced Fiscal Space During Crises A country with large debt may lack flexibility in emergencies (e.g., pandemics, wars) β†’ Less room to borrow and stimulate economy without risking investor confidence β†’ Slower or weaker crisis response β†’ greater long-term economic and social damage 5️⃣ 🧨 Risk of Sovereign Debt Crisis Very large debt (e.g., >120% of GDP) may raise fears of default β†’ Investors demand higher bond yields or stop lending altogether β†’ Currency falls, capital flight increases, and economy may need bailout (e.g., Greece 2010s) β†’ Severe cuts to spending worsen development 6️⃣ πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Weaker Credit Rating Credit agencies (e.g., Moody’s, S&P) may downgrade government bonds if debt seen as unsustainable β†’ Increases cost of borrowing further due to higher yields demanded β†’ Vicious cycle of rising debt servicing β†’ budget cuts β†’ reduced growth 7️⃣ πŸ” Debt Overhang β†’ Reduced Confidence Large debt creates expectations of future austerity or tax rises β†’ Firms delay investment and households reduce consumption β†’ Slower growth and productivity gains β†’ worsens debt-to-GDP ratio further β†’ Development progress stagnates 8️⃣ πŸͺ™ Potential for Inflation (Especially if Debt Monetised) If central bank is pressured to finance debt (monetary financing or QE used irresponsibly) β†’ Too much money chasing fewer goods β†’ inflation rises β†’ Real incomes fall, especially hurting the poor β†’ worsens inequality and development indicators 9️⃣ 🌍 External Vulnerability in Emerging Markets Developing countries often borrow in foreign currencies β†’ large debt exposes them to FX risk β†’ If local currency depreciates, cost of repayments soars β†’ Can lead to IMF bailouts with strict conditions β†’ cuts in health, education, subsidies β†’ Negative impact on HDI and long-term development
61
Evaluate the impact of a large fiscal deficit and national debt on a country’s economy
πŸ”— Chain 1: Higher Borrowing β†’ Higher Interest Payments β†’ Opportunity Cost A large fiscal deficit requires more government borrowing β†’ National debt increases β†’ interest payments rise β†’ Less money available for investment in infrastructure or education β†’ Slower long-run growth and development πŸ”— Chain 2: Increased Borrowing β†’ Crowding Out β†’ Lower Private Investment Government sells more bonds to finance deficit β†’ Raises interest rates in financial markets β†’ Private firms find it more expensive to borrow β†’ investment falls β†’ Slower productivity growth and employment creation πŸ”— Chain 3: Debt and Deficit β†’ Risk to Investor Confidence β†’ Currency Depreciation Investors worry about fiscal sustainability β†’ May sell off assets β†’ capital flight β†’ Exchange rate falls β†’ imported inflation β†’ Lower real incomes β†’ reduced consumer confidence and development πŸ”— Chain 4: Higher Deficit β†’ Pressure to Raise Taxes or Cut Spending Governments may respond to large deficits by raising taxes or cutting welfare β†’ Higher taxes reduce disposable income β†’ AD falls β†’ Cuts to education and health undermine human capital β†’ Negative long-term development impacts πŸ”— Chain 5: Debt β†’ Reduced Fiscal Space β†’ Weak Emergency Response If debt is already high, governments have limited capacity to respond to future crises β†’ Delayed stimulus during recessions (e.g., pandemic) β†’ Longer economic downturns, more unemployment and poverty πŸ”— Chain 6: Large Deficits β†’ Rating Downgrades β†’ Higher Borrowing Costs Credit rating agencies may downgrade the country’s bonds β†’ Investors demand higher yields to compensate for risk β†’ Further increases debt servicing burden β†’ feedback loop πŸ”— Chain 7: Persistent Deficits β†’ Inflation Risk (in some contexts) If government uses central bank financing (QE/printing money), money supply rises β†’ More demand without supply-side increase β†’ demand-pull inflation β†’ Damages real incomes and price stability πŸ”— Chain 8: External Debt β†’ Foreign Exchange Pressure in Developing Countries Many EMDEs borrow in USD β†’ if local currency weakens, repayments become costlier β†’ Risk of default or IMF intervention with austerity conditions β†’ Hurts education/health spending β†’ worsens HDI πŸ”— Chain 9: Deficits Can Be Positive If Used for Productive Investment (Evaluation chain) If borrowing funds are used for growth-enhancing infrastructure (e.g. HS2, broadband) β†’ Boosts LRAS and productivity β†’ tax revenues rise over time β†’ Debt/GDP falls in the long run β†’ sustainable development