Year 1 micro - market failure Flashcards
(44 cards)
What are merit goods
goods that are under consumed, have positive externalities and consumers fail to recognise the full benefits of consumption
What are demerit goods
Goods deemed more harmful to consumers than they realise, often will generate negative externalities
Examples of imperfect information
- Information failure, consumers may be choosing to ignore information, information may not be clear, information may not be present
- asymmetric information - information is available, but is not shared equally between the two parties
examples of demerit goods
- cigarettes
- alcohol
- overconsumed and overproduced by free market
characteristics of pure public goodd
- non excludable
- non rival
meaning of non excludable and why
- everybody has access to it
- the benefits of consuming the good cannot be confined to the individual that has paid
- there is no cost efficient way to price
meaning of non rival
the quantity available of the good doesn’t diminish upon consumption
examples of public goods
- flood defences
- defences
- road signs
- street lights
what is the free rider problem
where individuals have the incentive not to contribute anything at all to the provision of public goods because they will wait for others to contribute , and benefit off that
why is the free rider problem bad
- leads to the under provision of public goods in the free market
- because nobody will want to pay towards the provision of public goods, so there will be no private motive to supply them, no chance of profit
what are quasi public good
a good that sometimes shows the characteristics of a pure public good, but sometimes will show characteristics of a private good
examples of quasi public goods
- roads - toll roads, excludable, congestion times diminish quantity available, making it rivalrous
- beaches - eg if a hotel can own a beach, that makes it excludable. during peak times, it can also be rival
what are common access resources
natural resources over which no private ownership has been established
examples of common access resources
- forests, which provide timber and pulp for us to make paper
- seas , providing us with seafood and minerals
- air, providing us with o2
why isn’t there private ownership of common access resources
🌊 1. Non-excludability makes ownership difficult
Common access resources (CARs) are non-excludable, meaning it’s hard to stop people from using them →
This makes defining and enforcing property rights very difficult or costly →
Without excludability, private firms can’t charge for use or control access →
So there’s little incentive for private ownership since they can’t profit.
🪵 2. High monitoring and enforcement costs
Even if ownership is possible (e.g. part of a forest), monitoring illegal use (like poaching or logging) is expensive →
High enforcement costs reduce the appeal of private investment →
Governments or local communities often can’t afford effective policing →
As a result, private ownership doesn’t emerge or isn’t sustained.
🧍♂️ 3. Tragedy of the commons
CARs are often overused because individuals act in self-interest, leading to overconsumption and depletion →
Without ownership, no one has the incentive to conserve or manage the resource →
Private firms may avoid ownership due to bad reputational and sustainability risks →
So, these resources are left in public/common hands.
🏛️ 4. Equity and public good concerns
Many believe CARs should belong to everyone, not just the wealthy or powerful →
Privatisation could limit access for poorer communities (e.g. water, grazing land) →
This creates social and ethical opposition to private ownership →
So, governments often keep these resources as public or communal goods.
what is the tragedy of the commons
where the private producers will act according to their self interest and unsustainably keep exploiting common access resources, eventually leading to depletion of that resource
examples of producers acting by self interest
- profit motive - private producers may keep fishing/cutting down trees if the resources that they get can be used to increase their profit
- new producers may come and take more resources after old producers stop
impacts of resource depletion
Economic Costs
- Resource depletion, such as the exhaustion of fossil fuels or minerals, leads to rising extraction costs as resources become harder to access.
- This increases production costs for businesses reliant on these resources.
- Higher prices for goods and services, potentially reducing consumer spending and slowing economic growth.
Reduced Economic Growth
- Depleted resources can limit industrial productivity, especially in resource-dependent economies. This may reduce GDP growth and weaken long-term economic prospects.
- Hampers development and lowers living standards in affected regions.
Environmental Degradation
- Overextraction often damages ecosystems, causing biodiversity loss, deforestation, or water pollution. Depleted natural environments reduce the planet’s ability to regenerate resources.
- Long-term harm to the environment undermines sustainable development and increases costs for environmental restoration.
Energy Scarcity
- Depletion of energy resources like oil and gas can cause energy shortages and price volatility, especially in economies heavily reliant on these sources.
- Creates uncertainty for businesses and households, increasing costs and reducing disposable income.
Social Inequality
- Resource depletion can disproportionately affect low-income populations, as they often rely on natural resources for livelihoods, such as farming or fishing.
- Worsens poverty and income inequality, particularly in developing countries.
Trade Imbalances
- Resource depletion in a country may force it to import essential materials, increasing dependency on foreign markets and creating trade deficits.
- Weakens the balance of payments, potentially leading to currency depreciation and economic instability.
Risk to Future Generations
- Unsustainable resource use depletes reserves that future generations would rely on, reducing their ability to meet economic and social needs.
- Undermines intergenerational equity and sustainability, limiting long-term global development prospects
what is government failure
when government intervention leads to a misallocation of scarce resources, harming social welfare
what is government failure an argument for
not having any government intervention, even if there is a market failure
Causes of government failure - Information failure
📉 Government Misallocates Resources Due to Incomplete Information
Governments rely on information to allocate resources efficiently in sectors like healthcare, education, or public goods
➡️ If the government lacks complete or accurate information about the needs or preferences of citizens, it may over-allocate resources to some areas and under-allocate to others
➡️ This misallocation of resources results in inefficient outcomes, where taxpayers’ money is not used optimally
➡️ Ultimately, this can lead to government failure as the desired public objectives are not met
🔄 Information Asymmetry Leads to Poor Policy Design
In many sectors, there can be an information gap between the government and the private sector (e.g., healthcare providers or industries)
➡️ If the government does not have access to the full scope of relevant data, it may enact policies that do not align with the real needs of the market or society
➡️ For instance, if the government fails to understand the full impact of certain regulations or interventions on businesses, it may impose burdens that harm the economy or reduce productivity
➡️ This can result in policy inefficiencies and unintended consequences, contributing to government failure
🤷♂️ Citizens’ Lack of Information Leads to Poor Choices
Governments often rely on citizens making informed decisions when designing policies (e.g., taxes, health initiatives, or voting for leaders)
➡️ If citizens are not provided with adequate information or if they misunderstand key issues (e.g., due to misleading media or lack of transparency), they may vote or act in ways that do not reflect their best interests
➡️ This misinformed public behavior can push the government towards policies that do not serve the majority’s welfare
➡️ As a result, the government may implement policies that are either too popular but inefficient or too unpopular and ineffective, causing government failure
📚 Difficulty in Measuring the Effectiveness of Policies
Governments often find it difficult to measure the effectiveness of their policies due to a lack of reliable data or inaccurate feedback mechanisms
➡️ This makes it challenging to assess whether a policy is meeting its objectives (e.g., reducing poverty, improving public health)
➡️ As a result, the government may continue to implement ineffective policies for extended periods, wasting resources and achieving minimal positive outcomes
➡️ This failure to adapt policies based on accurate feedback leads to government failure because the intended benefits are not realized
🏛️ Interest Groups and Lobbying Distort Information
Special interest groups or powerful industries can sometimes provide misleading or selective information to the government
➡️ These interest groups might lobby for policies that favor their sector, even if those policies are detrimental to the wider economy or society
➡️ If the government does not verify or cross-check the information, it may base decisions on biased or inaccurate data
➡️ This results in suboptimal policy outcomes and contributes to government failure, as public policies are distorted by private interests
Causes of government failure - costs
- High administrative, enforcement, or implementation costs can outweigh the benefits of a policy.
- For example, subsidies for renewable energy projects might involve significant financial support and administrative overheads.
- These high costs can strain government budgets, leading to reduced funding for other essential areas such as healthcare or education, (high opp cost)
Causes of government failure - unintended consequences
- black markets
- negative impacts on people not part of the policy, eg regressive taxes/min price
- impact on firms, overstrict regulation on tax, may shut down, leading to unemployment
- firms may become dependent/ wasteful on their subsidies (x inefficiency)
- state provision could lead to excess demand
- Policies can have unexpected side effects. - For instance, imposing rent controls to make housing affordable may discourage landlords from maintaining or investing in properties, leading to a decline in housing quality.
- The original problem (e.g., affordable housing) might not only persist but also worsen, leading to further intervention and inefficiencies.
causes of government failure - regulatory capture
- Regulators may become influenced by the industries they are supposed to oversee, prioritizing the interests of firms over the public.
- For instance, energy regulators might approve price increases that disproportionately benefit providers.
- Regulatory capture distorts policy objectives, leading to inefficiencies, reduced consumer welfare, and potentially higher prices.
- when governments try to regulate monopoly power
- occurs when the interests of society are overlooked for the interest of CEOS
- so CEOs can influence regulators to reduce the extent of regulation