Test 1 Readings Flashcards
what do positivists assume about social realities?
they already exist and are just waiting to be discovered
how do positivists measure social realities?
quantitatively
what do interpretivists assume about social realities?
they’re subjectively constructed and based on history, culture and society
what do interpretivists emphasize about studying social realities?
meaning and motive
how do interpretivists measure social realities?
qualitatively
which method of reasoning is top down and which is bottom up?
top down: deductive
bottom up: inductive
deductive reasoning
starting with a general idea and testing its validity on specific cases
which reasoning is quantitative and which is qualitative
deductive: quant
inductive: qual
inductive reasoning
identify multiple concrete cases and identify a general pattern/idea that fits them all
objectivity
when independent researchers examine the same subject and produce consistent observations
4 basic principles of canadian ethics in sociology
- voluntary participation
- harm minimization
- right to privacy
- authenticity (don’t decieve participants; if necessary they need to be debriefed)
3 criteria needed to establish a causal relationship
- a relationship exists
- the IV occurs before the DV
- the IV is responsible for the change in DV
validity vs reliability
validity: degree that results are reflected accurately
reliability: consistency of results
what theory does the interpretivist approach correlate with?
symbolic interactionism
what theories does the positivist approach correlate with?
SF/conflict theory
3 levels of social structures
microstructures, macrostructures & global structures
unintrusive measures
do not require active cooperation of respondents and don’t contaminate results
3 ways of knowing
casual observation, relying on tradition and relying on authority
casual observation
regular human observation done without much thought
what is one disadvantage of relying on tradition?
some traditional knowledge is invalid
3 common errors in inquiry
overgeneralization, selective observation and illogical reasoning
overgeneralization
treating an exception as the rule
selective observation
unconsciously ignoring evidence that challenges our beliefs/cherry-picking evidence
illogical reasoning
ignoring the fact that sometimes things happen by chance