Theory and Methods Debates Flashcards
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
What is a science?
The objective and systematic study that relies on empirical evidence to aquire knowledge of the natural world.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
What is empiricism?
5 Components of science
An approach that emphasises the collection and analysis of data from direct observation, measurement or experimentation.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
What is testable?
5 Components of science
When a hypothesis or research question can be examined and evaluated through investigation.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
What is theoretical?
5 Components of science
The use of theories to expalin and understandsocial phenomena.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
What is cumulative?
5 Components of science
Building on existing knowledge through the collection of evidence.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
What is objective?
5 Components of science
minimising bias when conducting research.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Why can sociology be considered a science?
It meets several key criteria that define a science.
Sociology relies on systematic observation of social phenomena: The use of various research methods, such as analysis of existing data.
Sociologists propose hypotheses based on theories and test them through empirical research.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Why can sociology not be considered a science?
Sociology lacks the ability to make precise predictions about human behavior and social phenomena because they are influenced by a wide range of complex factors that are difficult to predict. Whereas natural sciences often deal with deterministic and predictable phenomena.
Sociology deals with subjective experiences that vary across individuals and cultures therefore it can be difficult to establish objective and universally valid explanations.
Sociology often deals with sensitive and morally charged topics, such as inequality which may make it difficult to maintain objectivity - a key principles of scientific inquiry.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Explain the positivist view on whether sociology should be considered a science.
Positivists argue that sociology is a science and should employ scientific methodologies, such as measurement, and experimentation, to study social phenomena because they provide empirical evidence to generate reliable and objective knowledge about society.
Positivists assert that sociology, as a science, should aim to predict and control social phenomena.
Through systematic observation and analysis of data, sociologists can identify patterns in social behavior and establish general principles that apply to society as a whole.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Durkheim is a positivist.
How does his study of suicide 1897 relate to the argument that sociology is a science?
He used quantitative data from official statistics on suicide rates, which allowed him to analyze patterns and correlations across different social groups and contexts.
Durkheim identified two key social factors that influence suicide rates: social integration and social regulation.
Durkheim classified different types of suicide based on the levels of social integration and regulation. e.g. Egoistic suicide occurs when individuals feel detached from society.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Explain the interpretivist view on whether sociology should be considered a science.
Interpretivists argue that sociology should not be a science because of its subjective nature - They argue that social reality is constructed through the meanings and interpretations that individuals attach to their actions and social structures.
A science would not allow a researcher to find the cultural meanings, and social interactions that shape human behavior.
Interpretivists emphasise the importance of empathetic understanding (Verstehen) - by appreciating the subjective experiences and interpretations of individuals, social phenomena can be understood.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Becker is an interpretivist
How does his study “Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance” relate to the argument that sociology should not be a science?
Becker explores how certain individuals or groups are labeled as deviant by society and how this labeling process affects their identities and social interactions.
The study employs qualitative research methods such as participant observation, to understand the experiences and perspectives of individuals involved in deviant behavior.
This highlights the importance of understanding the subjective meanings attached to behaviors and the social dynamics involved.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Explain popper’s falsification view on whether sociology should be considered a science.
Popper argues that a theory is scientific if it is falsifiable - it can be disproved. For example, it must be possible to encounter evidence that would contradict or refute it.
When a theory is falsified, it is rejected or modified which leads to the development of new theories that are more accurate. This iterative process improves scientific knowledge over time.
For example, in the study “The Effect of Parental Divorce on Children’s Academic Achievement” Contrary to the hypothesis, the study finds no significant difference in academic achievement between children from divorced families and those from intact families.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Explain keat and urry’s realism view on whether sociology should be considered a science.
They argue that sociology should be seen as a science, but one that is distinct from the natural sciences.
They are an advocate for ontological realism - this is the idea that there is an external social reality that is beyond human perception and interpretation.
Therefore, sociology should adopt scientific methodology - empirical observation and measurement - to recognise the subjective aspects of social life.
SOCIOLOGY AND SCIENCE
Explain Kuhn’s paradigm view on whether sociology should be considered a science.
Kuhn defines a scientific paradigm as a set of shared beliefs, assumptions and methods that provide a framework for scientists to understand and investigate phenomena.
Normal science refers to the phase where scientists conduct research, refine theories, and solve puzzles which may lead to anomalies or unexpected findings that challenge the paradigm’s ability to explain certain phenomena.
This may trigger a scientific revolution where a new paradigm emerges that provides a different framework for understanding and explaining the phenomena that the old paradigm could not account for.
In sociology new findings within society can lead to the establishment of new perspectives - The conflict theory paradigm emphasises the conflicts between different social groups whereas the functionalism paradigm focuses on the interrelationships and functions of different social institutions within society.
Sociology and values
What are values?
The beliefs, opinions and prejudices that everyone holds and are influenced by the social structures we belong to.
Sociology and values
Why should sociology be value free?
Objectivity requires minimising personal biases which allows for a more generalizable and unbiased study of social phenomena.
Values and ideologies can shape our perceptions and interpretations of social phenomena. By striving for value neutrality it prevents the distortion of findings and interpretations.
Sociology and values
Why should sociology be value-led?
Sociology emphasizes the importance of collaborating with communities and involving them in the research process.
This approach recognises the value of local knowledge, experiences, and perspectives.
Sociology and values
Explain the positivist view on whether sociology should be value free.
They argue that sociology should be value-free by by adopting objective methods to study social facts which are empirical.
Collecting empirical data will allow the researcher to eliminate bias that may influence the research process and the interpretation of data.
The lack of bias in research will produce reproducible valid data that is credible.
E.g. In the 1970s, Safilios-Rothschild conducted a quantitative study examining discrimination against women in hiring practices and found clear evidence that female applicants experienced lower callback rates compared to male applicants, demonstrating employment discrimination.
Sociology and values
Explain Weber’s view on whether sociology should be value free.
Weber argues that sociology should not strive to be completely value-free but should instead embrace a methodological value neutrality.
Weber acknowledges that values play a crucial role in shaping social life and so will inevitably influence the research process. Therefore, researchers cannot completely separate their personal values from their work, as their values shape their choice of research topics and the interpretation of data.
He believes researchers should strive for a balanced analysis that takes into account both empirical observations and the subjective meanings attributed to social actions.
Sociology and values
Explain the interpretivist view on whether sociology should be value free.
They argue that sociology cannot and should not be value-free, as values shape social reality.
They argue that understanding social phenomena requires examining the subjective experiences, cultural contexts, and symbolic meanings attributed to them by individuals therefore, values cannot be separated from the research process.
They argue that researchers should embrace their own values as part of the research process and engage in value-laden discussions to understand diverse perspectives and social realities better.
E.g. in Goldberg’s (2006) study of the effects of welfare reform in the U.S, she openly criticized the reforms, arguing they threatened to entrench deeper poverty. - demonstrates how research might shed light on social justice issues.
Sociology and values
Explain Becker’s view on whether sociology should be value free.
He argues that complete value neutrality is an unrealistic goal for sociology because they guide the research process e.g. choosing topics Therefore, he advocates for critical awareness of these values.
By acknowledging values or biases, sociologists can engage in more honest and accountable research, promoting transparency and intellectual integrity.
Sociology and values
Explain the Value Laden Approach on whether sociology should be value free.
This approach argues that sociology should embrace and engage with values.
Sociologists cannot separate themselves from their own values and biases, as these shape their perspectives and influence their understanding of social phenomena.
They emphasise the need for sociologists to engage with diverse perspectives in their research to provide a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of social phenomena.
E.g. In the 1970s, sociologist Sara Evans deliberately chose to focus her research on the burgeoning feminist movement because she supported their aims of achieving greater equality and empowerment for women.
Sociology and social policy
What is social policy?
The laws and acts made by the government which aim to improve society or deal with a social problem.
They reflect the actions undertaken by governments to address social issues.