Trait Approach Flashcards
Trait Approach
- “Great Person” theory – focused on identifying the inherent characteristics and qualities of leaders who were considered to be great
Inherent characteristics
Historical shifts in Trait perspectives
Early 1900s
“Great person” theory
Research focused on the inherent characteristics and qualities of leaders considered to be great that universally differentiated them from non-leaders
How habits leade to succession
1930-50s
Traits interact with situational demands
Stogdill (1948) –
* Leadership reconceptualised as relationships among individuals in social situations
* Some traits more important than others in certain situations
Mann (1959) –
* Less emphasis on situations
* Suggested personality traits could differentiate leaders from non-leaders
1970s – early 90s
Revival of critical role of traits in leader effectiveness
Stogdill (1974) –
* 10 traits associated with leadership in a positive way
Lord, DeVader & Alliger (1986) –
* Personality traits can be used to distinguish leaders
Kirkpatrick & Locke (1991) –
* 6 traits that leaders and non-leaders differ on
Today Five major leadership traits
- Intelligence
- Self-confidence
- Determination
- Integrity
- Sociability
Intelligence
- Intellectual ability including verbal, perceptual, and reasoning ability.
- Leaders have higher levels of intelligence than non-leaders.
- Allows leaders to more effectively develop social judgment and complex problem-solving.
- May be counterproductive if leader’s intelligence is much higher than followers’ intelligence.
- Too advanced in their thinking to effectively communicate and be understood or accepted by followers.
Ability to solve problems
Converse on how we convey that problem
Ability to talk and offer the information
Highly intelligent and convey as such, ditstant followers
–> being more intelligent doesn’t not mean we can connect at our followers level
Crystallised intelligence: knowledge we acquire
Fluid: ability to solve UNIQUE problems , I haven’t seen
Could you do what I am doing ?
Self-confidence
- Positive perspective on their ability to make judgments, make decisions and to develop ideas.
- Be assured of your skills, knowledge, abilities and competencies.
- Important to be able to express that confidence to followers.
- E.g. being calm, cool, and collected in a crisis situation
Ability to look confident.
Trust to follow that leader
Confident vs arrogance
Narcissism and confidence
Deep understanding on who you are to have self-confidence
Genuine self-confidence
Determination
- Task orientation – A desire to get the job done.
- Be willing to be assertive, proactive and to persevere when the going gets tough.
Just keep going for those who want to succeed
Integrity
- Being trustworthy and honest, and take responsibility for one’s actions and holding fast to strong principles.
- Consistency between what you believe, think, say and do.
Drucker: Management theory
○ Consistent in their approach
○ Ability for others to say this is what this person said and do
Sociability
- Inclination to seek out pleasant social relationships.
- Empathetic to the concerns and needs of others.
- Exhibit friendliness, courtesy, tactfulness, diplomacy and an outgoing personality.
- Above average interpersonal skills, and they develop a higher level of cooperation with and among their followers.
Converse with others
Not singular traits
Behaviour also comes in handy
Emotional Intelligence Ability
EI as having the ability:
* To perceive and express emotions
* To control our own emotions while behaving with integrity and honesty
* To be empathetic towards others
* To effectively manage our own and others’ emotions
Goleman (1995,1998) EI encompasses:
Origins of the 5-Factor Model
• Analyses of dictionary derived adjectives by Thurstone (1934, Allport & Odbert (1936), and to the re-analyses of Catell’s (1947) by Fiske (1949) and Tupes and Christal (1958).
• Based on idea that the factors underlying personality can be uncovered through the study of language, i.e. the lexical hypothesis
• ‘of the myriad of ways that humans differ from one another…the most important have eventually become encoded in our language as trait descriptive terms’ (Peabody & Goldberg, 1989 p1)
Criticisms of the 5-Factor Model
• There is much beyond the 5-Factor Model, e.g. it doesn’t seem to account for honesty particularly well.
• Some feel another number between 3 and 7 better summarizes personality.
• Be aware of Hogan Personality Inventory and HEXACO models.
• It is really a taxonomy, it is purely descriptive, and is not a ‘theory’ of personality.
• However, as Occupational psychologists you need to be able to relate what you do with personality to 5-Factor Model as much of what we know about personality in the world of work is expressed in 5-Factor Model terms.
5-Factor Model and leadership
Big 5 and leadership
• Meta-analysis by Judge et. al. (2002)
• Strong relationship between personality traits and leadership.
• Extraversion: Most strongly positively associated with effective leadership Extraversion relates to leadership…don’t blow out of proportion o It might only be accountable by 1 or 2 % • Conscientiousness: 2nd most related factor Its not always the big stuff but the operational stuff that matters • Openness: Next most related • Neuroticism: Ranked 3rd with openness but negatively associated with leadership • Agreeableness: only weakly positively associated with leadership ○ One trait that doesn’t really matter ○ It is very situational.
All these relationships are really small
Correlation is really small
Uncorrected are really small
Motivation to Lead (Chan & Drasgow, 2001)
• A theoretical framework for understanding the role of individual differences in leadership behaviours, namely the leader development process and leader performance process.
• Differentiates leadership performance vs emergence.
• MTL defined as an individual differences construct that affects a leader’s or leader-to-be’s decision to assume leadership training, roles, and responsibilities, and that affect his or her intensity of effort at leading and persistence as a leader.
• Individual differences in MTL may interact with the person’s vocational or life-domain interests and abilities to predict leadership behaviours within a specific domain of work or life activity.
• The study
• Conducted on a sample of 1594 male enlisted military recruits in Singapore
There was behaviour outcome being measured.
• Aimed to develop a self-report measure of MTL and to build and test a model of antecedents of MTL • 3-month longitudinal within-culture study to establish the predictive and convergent validity of the self-report measure with two behavioural measures of leadership potential • Study published in Journal of Applied Psychology
Motivation To Lead
• Affective MTL: like to lead others
• Social-normative MTL: lead for reasons such as sense of duty or responsibility • Noncalculative MTL: lead if not calculative of the costs of leading relative to the benefits Focus on the benefits
• Antecedents of MTL (and its measures)
• Personality (the Big Five)
• Sociocultural values (Individualism-Collectivism measure) • Leadership self-efficacy (leadership self-efficacy measure) • Past leadership experience (biographical and self-report)
Interaction of traits and personal value = leadership
Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism (Singelis, Triandis, Bhawuk, & Gelfand, 1995)
Vertical collectivism
• Perceiving the self as part of a collective, and accepting inequalities within the collective
○ Part of a clique, Confucious, Singapore, seeks inequality
Vertical collectivism
• Perceiving the self as part of a collective, and accepting inequalities within the collective
○ Part of a clique, Confucious, Singapore, seeks inequality
• Horizontal collectivism
• Perceiving the self as part of the collective, but seeing all members of the collective as the same; Equality is stressed
○ Communist
• Vertical individualism
• Conception of an autonomous individual and acceptance of inequality
○ Seek inequality
○ Hongkong
• Horizontal individualism
• Conception of an autonomous individual and emphasis on equality
○ New Zealand , Denmark, Scandinavian
Past experiences give us a benchmark of what leadership is
Get to be the decision maker
Affective-identity MTL
• Directly related to extraversion, vertical individualism, past leadership experience, and leadership self-efficacy.
• Openness to experience indirectly related through past leadership experience.
• People who like to lead and who see themselves as having leadership qualities tend to be outgoing and sociable in nature, value competition and achievement, generally have more past leadership experience than their peers, and are confident in their own leadership abilities
Noncalculative MTL
Positively related to agreeableness, emotional stability, and collectivist values (both vertical and horizontal).
• Individualistic values (both vertical and horizontal) were negatively related.
• People high in noncalculative MTL do not expect rewards or privileges for leading but agree to lead because of their agreeable nature and because they tend to value harmony and are nonconfrontational in their relationships with others, irrespective of their own leadership experience or self-efficacy.
○ Agreeableness can lead to leadership ○ Have decisional power
Social-normative MTL
• Positively related to agreeableness, conscientiousness and both vertical individualism and vertical collectivism.
• Negatively related to horizontal individualism. • People high in social-normative MTL are motivated by a sense of duty and obligation and are also accepting of social hierarchies but rejecting of social equality. • Also tend to have more past leadership experience and are confident in their leadership abilities
Duty to lead
How does the trait approach work
• Focuses exclusively on the leader with no focus on followers or situations.
• What traits leaders exhibit, who has these traits. • Organisations use personality assessments to find “right” people • Personality assessment measures for fit. • Assumption that organisations will have better performance if they put people with specific traits into particular positions. What are those traits
Strengths of the Trait approach
• Intuitively appealing
• Perception that leaders are different in that they possess special traits. • People “need” to view leaders as gifted.
• Credibility due to a century of research support.
• Highlights leadership component in the leadership process.
• Deeper level understanding of how leader/personality is related to the leadership process.
• Provides benchmarks for what to look for in a leader.
Criticisms of the Trait approach
• Fails to delimit a definitive list of leadership traits
• Endless lists have emerged
• Doesn’t take into account situational effects
• Leaders in one situation may not be leaders in another situation.
• List of most important leadership traits is highly subjective.
• Much subjective experience and observations serve a basis for identified leadership traits.
• Research fails to look at traits in relationship to leadership outcomes.
• Not useful for training and development
How personality itself..it’s dynamic
Not as static
Outcome measures
2 questionnaires and people make correlation about leadership
Don’t know much about peronsality, Know from biography on the personality
Behavioural preferences
Application
• Provides direction as to which traits are good to have if one aspires to a leadership position.
• Individuals can determine if they have the select leadership traits and can pinpoint their strengths and weaknesses through various tests and questionnaires.
• Can be used by managers to assess where they stand within their organisation and what is needed to strengthen their position.