Unblocking and schizophrenia Flashcards

(17 cards)

1
Q

2 ways to unblock according to RW

A
  1. Decrease ΣV (remove predictive cues).
  2. Increase the value of λ (more to learn about).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dickinson et al. (1976) changing US and RW model

A

Both an increase and decrease in outcome (US) renewed attention to CS. Learning unblocked by change in reward (violating prediction of RW).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

McDannald et al. (2014) unblocking through valueless change

A

Learning unblocked just by a change in flavour, even though the subjective value of the reward stayed the same.

OFC responds to feature (not just value) changes. Salience neurons responded to previously trained cue, blocked stimulus, US value, and US stimulus feature. Predictive neurons responded only to predictiveness of outcome (no difference between feature vs. size).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Innate releasing stimuli

A

Some stimuli can have strong impacts on behaviour without learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Tinbergen and Perdeck (1950) importance of parent’s bill for chick pecking behaviour

A

Baby chicks pecked at a pencil with 3 lines. Movement and contrast were important, but realism and colour were not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Latent inhibition

A

Reduced rate of learning about a CS after CS has had repeated exposure with no consequences (stimulus change from being unpredictive to being predictive).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Latent inhibition and habituation

A

They are not the same. In latent inhibition, animals learn about the cue and its association with a context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Miller et al. (2015) context specificity of extinction vs. latent inhibition

A

Context specificity of extinction is stronger than context specificity of latent inhibition. Both are context specific.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Mackintosh (1975) learning and salience

A

Salience is flexible rather than fixed. Salience (α) increases if CS predicts an otherwise unexpected event and decreases if CS predicts no change. Change in α is positive if CS is a better predictor than others (pay attention to what works).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2 types of salience

A
  1. Perceptual salience. (How much the cue stands out).
  2. Associability. (Learnt salience determined by past experience).

More salient cues are better remembered. A cue that reliably predicts an outcome will gain associability (attention).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Pearce-Hall and salience

A

Predicts the opposite to Mackintosh. Change in attention positive if it is surprising (pay attention to what is unexpected).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is amphetamine?

A

Dopamine agonist. Produces symptoms of schizophrenia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Treatment for schizophrenia

A

Antagonising (blocking) dopamine D2 receptors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Serra et al. (2001) latent inhibition and schizophrenia

A

Schizophrenic patients show reduced blocking and latent inhibition effects (learning about things that should be irrelevant; increased salience).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Jones et al. (1997) schizophrenia and attention

A

Schizophrenia patients (and relatives) show enhanced learning to normally unattended stimuli.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Brain region for blocking

A

Medial frontal gyrus. (Higher activation = worse blocking).

17
Q

Kutlu et al. (2021) role of dopamine

A

Dopamine tracks perceived saliency (physical salience + experience).

Dopamine only worked for RPE. In shock conditioning, there was learning but no dopamine signal.