Unit 1 Flashcards

(24 cards)

1
Q

What type of argument is the teleological argument

A
  • a posteriori: based on experience of the world, perception and interpretation
  • inductive reasoning: a form of proof based on previous experience
  • based on empirical basis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aquinas’ 5th way

A
  • A form of the design argument in which he argues that everything seems to work towards an ‘end’ or ‘telos’
  • these objects cannot achieve this end by themselves, so they’re guided by an intelligent being, just as ‘the arrow is directed by the archer’
  • order in the world cannot be self-explanatory, something that ‘lacks intelligence’ cannot act with intelligence
  • must be an intelligent being - god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Premises for the design argument

A

P1: man made things in the world have been created by a designer with a purpose in mind
P2: the world looks as though it has been designed for a purpose because it works so well and has many intricate, complex parts
C: the world must have had a designer, this designer must have been god, therefore god exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Paley

A
  • argument in response to humes criticism of Aquinas’ argument
  • uses the analogy of a watch, both the watch and the world show PURPOSE and DESIGN, which isn’t by accident
  • the watch has been designed to work towards an end (telos) and needs a designer
  • paley argues that the world works together towards the end of existence and therefore needs a designer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Swinburne - teleological

A
  • it is more probable that god exits than he doesn’t
  • the universe could be a brute factor or explained by science but god is a better explanation
  • CUMULATIVE ARGUMENT: accumulating evidence that makes gods existence more likely to be true (very existence of the universe, order of the universe, existence of consciousness, humans opportunity to do good, patterns of history, miracles, religious experience
  • co presence and regulation of succession (specifics and function)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

F R Tennant - teleological

A
  • there is a huge amount of beauty in the world that isn’t necessary for life (cannot be explained by science)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Humes criticisms for aquinas

A
  • casual fallacy
  • weak analogy
  • unknown cause
  • anthropomorphism
  • tells us nothing about the designer
  • based on part, not whole
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

J S Mill (teleological)

A

The existence of suffering and evil points to bad design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dawkins (teleological)

A
  • blind watchmaker
  • flawed universe
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Darwin (teleological)

A
  • theory of evolution
  • survival of the fittest
  • natural selection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aquinas cosmological argument

A
  • first 3 of his 5 ways (summa theologica)
  • first way: argument from motion: things are in motion and can’t move themselves, this forms a chain of ‘moved’ and ‘moving’, which cannot have an infinite regress, there must be an ‘unmoved mover’
  • second way: argument from efficient cause: everything has a cause, there must be a necessary ultimate cause
  • third way: argument from contingency and necessity: the world is made up of contingent beings, must’ve been created by a necessary being, this must be god
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Leibniz - principle of suffience reason

A

Only sufficient reason comes from outside our world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Kalam cosmological argument

A

P1: the world must have a cause just as everything has a cause
P2: the world can’t have been created out of nothing
P3; the world must have been created at a particular point in time
P4: the cause of the world must be something which isn’t caused itself
P5: this being must be god
C: therefore god exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Kants criticisms of the cosmological argument

A
  • Aquinas’ argument from motion is flawed as it is not universal
  • infinite regress is not necessarily illogical
  • why should it be the god of classical theism?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Russells criticisms (cosmological argument)

A
  • following this logic god must have a cause
  • it is possible the world could’ve always existed
  • no such thing as a necessary being
  • the universe just is, it is a BRUTE FACT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Humes criticisms of Aquinas’ argument

A
  1. Rejects necessary existence
  2. Cannot assume empirically that everything has a cause
  3. The world itself could be necessary
  4. Just because part appears caused doesn’t mean the whole world is
17
Q

Anselm

A
  • uses deductive reasoning, if premise are true, conclusion is logically necessary
    P1: god is the greatest conceivable being (in the mind)
    P2: to be the greatest conceivable being, god must exist in reality
    C: god exists, using a priori reasoning
    F: he has necessary existence
18
Q

Guanilo

A
  • applies Anselms logic to other things, like a perfect island, to highlight what he viewed as flaws
19
Q

Descartes

A

Descartes used ‘essence’ to mean something fundamental to what something is e.g. 3 angles are part of the essence of a triangle
P1: god is perfect
P2: existence is a perfection
C: therefore god exists

20
Q

Kant - ontological argument

A
  • rejects the argument as it treats existence as a predicate
  • a predicate is an attribute or quality of something
  • knowing something existence tells us nothing about the thing
  • non-existence of god is conceivable
21
Q

Russell - ontological

A
  • things should only be described as existing if we can see they exist
  • all ontological argument are ‘bad grammar’ and they make a ‘linguistic mistake’ without realising
22
Q

Malcolm

A
  • says there are 3 options: god is necessary, god doesn’t exist, or god is contingent, rejecting the last 2
23
Q

Plantinga

A
  • aimed to strengthen Malcom’s modal and restate it with ‘maximal greatness’
  • there is a possible world with a maximally great entity
  • a maximally great being would exist in all possible world
  • therefore this maximally great being exists in this world
24
Q

Humes criticisms

A
  • notion of necessity has no meaning
  • if it did - why just god?
  • other things could also be considered necessary