Unit 3 Flashcards
(14 cards)
1
Q
Types of evil
A
- moral: caused by humans actions
- natural: caused by occurrences in nature
2
Q
Inconsistent triad
A
- it seems inconsistent that evil can exists with an omnipotent and benevolent god
1. Evidence for evil cannot be denied
2. The omnipotence of god is central to Christian teaching
3. The benevolence is also central
3
Q
J L Mackie
A
- argues that these 3 principles are inconsistent and cannot be made compatible
- no valid solution has been found that does not compromise or remove one of them, most commonly gods omnipotence
4
Q
Hume
A
- problem of evil as a good argument against the existence of god
5
Q
General religious responses
A
- Punishment for sin (problem: suffering seems random, those who commit evil often seem to get away with it)
- Test from god (problem: if god is omniscient, why would he need to test a believers faith?)
- The devil (problem: if god is omnipotent, he should be able to stop the devil, and would’ve created the devil making him responsible for evil)
6
Q
Augustines theodicy
A
- argues that evil is a privation - a lack or absence of something. Evil is therefore not an actual phenomenon
- privation is the result of the fall, as recorded in genesis 3, when humans disobeyed god, causing origina sin to enter the world and cause corruption in humans and in natural order
7
Q
Strengths of Augustines theodicy
A
- consistent with classical theism
- responsibility for evil given to huamns
- free will as reason for suffering
- evil + suffering - price worth paying for freedom?
-explanation for natural evil
8
Q
Weakness of Augustine’s theodicy
A
- isn’t scientifically possible all of humanity was seminally present in Adam
- original sin not fair as we suffer from Adam’s actions
- if the world was created perfect, how did Adam find out about evil
- gods omnipotence + omniscience is still challenged by Augustine’s solution
9
Q
Irenaeus’ theodicy
A
- like Augustine, he believed evil was the result of free will - to allow us to develop MORAL AND SPIRITUAL PERFECTION - to become truly in the image of god
- having the choice betweeen good and evil was essential for this perfection. If god made it so that humans could only every choose good, then their morality would be as a result of COERCION and therefore not truly good
- ETERNITY IN HEAVEN would make up for the suffering humans experience, would achieve moral perfection
- if god created a world with no evil, good characteristics needed for perfection could not be developed e.g. courage, love, compassion
10
Q
Hicks soul making theodicy
A
- argued the existence of good and evil helps humans develop good attributes and characteristics (soul making)
- this makes the existence of evil justified, and slo relates to the idea of EPISTEMICALLY DISTANCE - god created humans at a distance so they could know god but also choose to believe in him
- ESCHATOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION: since this process is rarely completed in 1 lifetime it must continue into the afterlife
11
Q
Strengths of hicks soul making theodicy
A
- eases the experience of evil and suffering if there is a greater purpose
- we can confirm from experience humans have free will
- places the responsibility on us
12
Q
Weaknesses of hicks soul making theodicy
A
- doesn’t explain why it allows such extreme suffering
- why wouldn’t such a loving god give us longer than a human life to grow
- if Jesus was a perfect man, he would’ve been morally good before he suffered
13
Q
Process theodicy
A
- whitehead and hartshorn
- gods nature is somewhat limited, and so is in a way responsible for evil
- god is part of the world and a FELLOW SUFFERER, good occurs when the natural order works as it should + vice versa
- the world is always changing and there is natural order
14
Q
Leibniz
A
- theory of the best of all possible worlds
P1: god can conceive of infinite universes
P2: only one of these universes can exist
P3: god has a reason fro doing what he does
P4: god is good + benevolent
C1: therefore of all possible worlds, he would choose the best one
C2: this world is the best possible world, despite the existence of suffering