Unit 3 Flashcards
(54 cards)
clinical assessment
Systematic evaluation and
measurement of
psychological, biological,
and social factors in an
individual presenting with a
possible psychological
disorder.
diagnosis
Process of determining
whether particular problem
affecting the individual
meets criteria for a
psychological disorder,
usually based on the DSM-5-
TR
reliability and the 2 types
Degree to which a measurement is consistent
-interrater reliability:two different assessors should arrive at the same
result
-Test-retest reliability: the assessment results should be stable across time
-Reliable: Can the assessment provide the same answer each time?
validity and the 2 types
Whether something measures what it is supposed to measure
-Concurrent validity: Accurately estimate other measures that assess the
same thing
-Predictive validity: How well assessment predicts what would happen in
the future
-Validity: Can the assessment
predict behavioural and psychiatric disorders accurately?
standardization
Application of certain standards to ensure consistency
norms
Norms: Ability to compare results to other people similar in gender, age, cultural background
important things to learn in a clinical interview
Current and past behaviour, attitudes, and emotions
History of individual’s life in general
Presenting problem
Current and past interpersonal and social history
Family makeup
Individual’s upbringing
Educational history
Cultural and religious background and experiences
Sexual development and orientation
mental status exam: appearance and behaviour
-overt behaviour
-attire
-appearance, posture, expressions
mental status exam: though processes
-rate of speech
-continuity of speech
-content of speech
mental status exam: mood and affect
-predominant feeling state of the individual
-feeling state accompanying what individual says
mental status exam: intellectual functioning
-types of vocabulary
-use of abstractions and metaphors
mental status exam: sensorium
-awareness of surrounding in terms of person (self and clinician), time, and place
-oriented times three
unstructured interview
-open ended to follow patients lead
pros:
-talk about what they want to talk about
-more natural, normal conversation
cons:
-might not get the information needed
-wont be able to get there on their own
-could be biased
structured interview
-Prescribe wording of questions and interpretations of responses
pros:
-quicker
-impact of bias
-more reliable and valid
-recognize patterns
-anyone could give this interview
cons:
-might jeopardize
-miss information if you are stuck to a script
-inhibit the patient from giving information
semi structured interviews
▪ Clinician has leeway about
what questions to ask, what
order, and what wording
▪ However, must follow general outline
- best approach
behavioural assessment
Direct observation to assess thoughts, feelings, and
behaviour
○ Best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour
○ Provides useful insight for treatment
○ Particularly helpful for young children or non-verbal
individuals
behavioural naturalistic observation
Identify and define the problem behaviour
○ E.g., The number of times I say “um” during a lecture
Define the period of observation (e.g., 1 hour each week)
Observe and record (e.g., frequency of ums)
Usually done to assess progress in an intervention or assess where to target intervention
analogue observation
Replicate a real-world setting in the clinic
functional behavioural assessment
What is the function of
the problem behaviour?
ABC’s
○ Antecedent (when the child cant use ipad)
○ Behaviour (patient says okay and meltdown gets reinforced)
○ Consequence (child stays the same)
Very helpful to inform
treatment
self monitoring
Clients asked to observe their own behaviour
○ E.g., sleep diary
Behaviour Rating Scales and Checklists
○ E.g., Current Symptoms
Scale for Adult ADHD
cons:
behaviour changes because they might make more of an effort because they are self aware. can also increase the use of skills
pros:
-can increase the use of skills which then is basically helping them with this issue
personality tests: pro/cons
Pros:
-Standardized
-Have norms
-Reliable and valid
Cons:
-Could be prone to faking or social desirability
Minnesota Multi-phasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2)
Very popular
Strong psychometrics (reliability and validity)
Read 567 self-descriptive sentences, and mark as either true or false
○ Very long!
Created using empirical criterion keying
Began with 1000 items, narrowed to 550
▪ Used to help inform diagnoses
▪ Treatment placement and type
▪ Forensic settings, personnel testing
▪ Adolescent version (MMPI-A; 14-18
yo), and a short version (MMPI-2-RF)
▪ Cons
▪ Too lengthy
▪ Clients can still “fake”
▪ Focus of personality is pathology
intelligence testing
Developed by Alfred Binet in 1904
○ Goal: to predict who would do well in school
○ Revised to become the Stanford-Binet Test
○ Intelligence Quotient (IQ) = Mental age ÷ Chronological age ⨯ 100
Current IQ scores are deviation scores:
○ how much of a child’s performance will deviate from average
performance of others of the same age
IQ is not Intelligence
○ Other aspects of intelligence not measured with tests (e.g., creativity,
ability to adapt)
○ Mainly a predictor of how well someone might do in school
Wechsler scales IQ test: WAIS-IV
○ Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Organization,
Processing Speed, Working Memory
○ May not generalize to other cultural groups