UNIT 4: Dynamics and Processes in Motivation Flashcards
(14 cards)
Overview of Motivation Theories
Motivation theories can be categorized into:
- Classic Theories (Unit 3) - Focus on what motivates people (needs, factors, content).
- Modern Theories - Focus on how motivation works (expectations, perceptions, decision-making processes).
Self-Determination Theory (Ryan & Deci, 1985) Key Concepts
People are motivated when they feel they have control over their actions (Autonomy), are competent in their activities (Competence), and have meaningful social connections (Relatedness).
Self-Determination Theory: Our basic needs
- Autonomy: People need to feel in control of their own life, behaviours, and goals. This is about choice.
This fosters intrinsic motivation and self-direction.
Example: Choosing a project based on personal interest. - Competence: People need to gain mastery and control of their own lives & their environment. Essential to wellness.
This increases motivation when we feel we are mastering tasks.
Example: Completing a challenging task and gaining mastery. - Relatedness: People need to experience a sense of belonging and connection with other people. Feeling cared for by others & to care for others.
This enhances motivation when we feel part of a community.
Example: Collaborating with supportive colleagues.
Self-Determination Types of Motivation
- Intrinsic Motivation: Driven by internal satisfaction, enjoyment, and personal interest.
- Extrinsic Motivation: Driven by external rewards like money, recognition, or social pressure.
- Continuum of Motivation: Ranges from purely intrinsic (autonomous) to fully extrinsic motivation (controlled).
Self-Determination Implications in the Workplace
- Employers should promote autonomy by offering choice and flexibility for employees.
- Competence should be nurtured through challenges that are neither too easy nor too difficult.
- Relatedness should be promoted by caring about others and being cared for rather than ignoring feelings in the workplace.
- Satisfaction should be promoted through positive work relationships and meaningful goals, not money (relatedness, intrinsic vs extrinsic).
Introduction to Goal-Setting Theory
- Developed by Edwin Locke (1968) and later expanded with Gary Latham (2006).
- Proposes that setting specific, challenging goals significantly enhances performance and motivation.
- Goals serve as an internal stimulus that directs focus, effort, and persistence.
Why Goals Matter in Motivation
- People perform better when they have clear, structured objectives.
- Goals influence effort, persistence, and strategic planning.
- Clarity and challenge in goals drive motivation beyond simple effort alone.
Key Principles of Goal-Setting Theory
- Clarity/Specificity
Goals should be clear and well-defined rather than vague.
Example: Instead of “Improve fitness,” set “Run 10km under 1 hour within 2 months.”
- Challenge
Goals should be difficult yet achievable to push individuals beyond their comfort zones.
Example: A runner aiming to reduce their 5K race time by 30 seconds instead of simply “getting better.”
- Commitment
Employees must be personally invested in achieving the goal.
Commitment increases when goals align with personal values and job expectations.
- Feedback
Continuous feedback ensures individuals can adjust strategies to stay on track.
Example: Weekly progress meetings to review performance toward a sales target.
- Task Complexity
Goals should be challenging and achievable but not overwhelming.
Tasks should be broken down into manageable steps to avoid frustration and burnout.
The Power of Self-Efficacy (Bandura)
- Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s belief in their own ability to achieve a goal.
- High self-efficacy leads to:
- Greater persistence in the face of challenges.
- More ambitious self-set goals.
- Higher overall performance in achieving objectives.
- Example: Roger Bannister’s 4-minute mile (1954):
Before Bannister broke the barrier, it was widely believed to be impossible.
After his achievement, multiple athletes followed suit, proving that belief plays a critical role in motivation and success.
SMART Goals Framework
A structured approach to goal setting:
- Specific: Clear and precise.
- Measurable: Can be quantified and tracked.
- Attainable: Realistic and achievable.
- Relevant: Aligns with broader objectives.
- Timely: Has a set deadline for completion.
Goals focus attention and energy. They increase persistence—people work harder when they have a clear target. They boost self-confidence—achieving goals builds momentum for future success.
Practical Workplace Applications
- Employee Performance Management
- Setting clear goals helps employees understand expectations and measure progress.
- Example: A salesperson aiming to make 50 sales calls per week rather than a vague target like “increase outreach.” - Personal and Team Development
- Teams perform better when each member has defined objectives.
- Example: Instead of “Improve teamwork,” a company can set a goal like “Complete a cross-functional project within 3 months with bi-weekly team evaluations.” - Organizational Productivity
- Businesses improve efficiency by breaking down large objectives into smaller, time-bound goals.
- Example: A startup planning to “Develop a product prototype in 6 months, conduct market testing by Month 8, and launch by Month 12.”
Introduction to Equity Theory
- Developed by John Stacy Adams (1963), Equity Theory explains motivation based on perceived fairness in social and workplace settings.
- People compare their input (effort, skills, time) and output (pay, recognition, benefits) to those of others.
- If they perceive an imbalance, they adjust their behavior (work harder, reduce effort, or even leave the organization).
Key Principle Equity Theory
Key Principle: Social Comparison and Fairness
- People don’t just care about how much they get—they care about how it compares to others.
- Equity occurs when:
Individual’s input/output ratio is perceived as fair relative to others. - Inequity occurs when:
Over-reward: Individual receives more than what they perceive as fair.
Under-reward: Individual receives less than what they perceive as fair.
Example: Protests by Amazon warehouse workers regarding executive pay vs. employee compensation.
Example: Criticism of the NBA for the distribution of revenue between owners and players.
Behavioral Reactions to Perceived Inequity (Equity Theory)
- Under-rewarded individuals may:
- Reduce effort or productivity.
- Demand better compensation or recognition.
- Become dissatisfied and demotivated.
- Consider leaving the job. - Well-rewarded individuals:
- Perceive equity between their efforts and rewards with those of relevant others.
This maintains motivation and competitiveness.