Unit 4 Flashcards
(40 cards)
Behavioral Perspective
focuses on observable behaviors and how they are learned through interactions with the environment, emphasizing the role of rewards, punishments, and reinforcement
Classical conditioning
a type of learning where an organism learns to associate a neutral stimulus with a naturally occurring stimulus (unconditioned stimulus), leading to a learned response (conditioned response) to the previously neutral stimulus.
Acquisition
the initial stage of learning or conditioning, where a response is first established and gradually strengthened through repeated pairings of a neutral stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus.
Unconditioned stimulus
a stimulus that automatically and naturally triggers a specific response (the unconditioned response or UR) without any prior learning or conditioning.
Unconditioned response
an automatic, reflexive, and naturally occurring behavior that is elicited by a specific stimulus without prior learning or conditioning.
Conditioned stimulus
a previously neutral stimulus that, after repeated pairing with an unconditioned stimulus (UCS), elicits a conditioned response (CR).
Conditioned response
a learned reaction to a previously neutral stimulus that, through repeated pairings with an unconditioned stimulus, now elicits that response.
Extinction
the gradual weakening and eventual disappearance of a learned behavior (or conditioned response) when it is no longer reinforced or paired with the original stimulus.
Spontaneous recovery
the unexpected reappearance of a previously extinguished conditioned response after a rest period, even without further pairings of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US).
Stimulus discrimination
the ability of an organism to distinguish between a specific stimulus and similar stimuli, and respond only to the specific stimulus that has been paired with a particular outcome (like reinforcement or punishment).
Generalization
the tendency to respond to stimuli that are similar to the original conditioned stimulus, even if they are not identical. This means applying a learned behavior or response to new situations or stimuli that resemble the original learned situation.
Higher-order Conditioning
occurs when a previously neutral stimulus becomes associated with a conditioned stimulus, leading to a conditioned response, even without the original unconditioned stimulus being present.
Counter conditioning
a behavior therapy technique that uses classical conditioning to replace an unwanted response to a stimulus with a desired or more adaptive response.
Taste Aversion
a learned avoidance of a specific food or taste after experiencing a negative reaction, like illness, following its consumption, even if the food was not the actual cause of the illness.
Biological preparedness
the innate or natural predisposition of organisms to learn certain associations and responses, especially those that have been adaptive for survival, more easily than others.
One-trial learning
the acquisition of a behavior or association after a single exposure to a stimulus or experience, rather than through repeated trials.
One-trial learning, also known as “single-trial learning,” suggests that learning can occur immediately and effectively with minimal or even a single exposure to a situation or stimulus.
Habituation
a diminished or disappearing response to a stimulus after repeated or prolonged exposure to it. It’s a form of non-associative learning where an organism becomes accustomed to a stimulus, and the initial response to it weakens or ceases.
Operant Conditioning
a learning process where voluntary behaviors are modified by associating them with consequences, such as rewards or punishments, to increase or decrease their likelihood of occurrence.
Law of Effect
Edward Thorndike, states that behaviors followed by positive consequences (reinforcement) are more likely to be repeated, while those followed by negative consequences (punishment) are less likely to be repeated.
Core Principle:
The Law of Effect is a fundamental principle in learning theory, suggesting that behaviors are shaped by their consequences.
Thorndike’s Contribution:
Edward Thorndike, a prominent psychologist, first proposed this principle in his work on learning in animals.
Reinforcement and Punishment:
Reinforcement: Behaviors that lead to satisfying or positive outcomes are more likely to be repeated.
Punishment: Behaviors that lead to unsatisfying or negative outcomes are less likely to be repeated.
Examples:
Positive Reinforcement: A child who is praised for good grades is more likely to study hard in the future.
Negative Reinforcement: A person who uses an umbrella to stay dry is more likely to use an umbrella in the rain in the future.
Punishment: A student who fails a test may be less likely to study for the next test.
Connection to Operant Conditioning:
The Law of Effect laid the foundation for the principles of operant conditioning, which focuses on how behaviors are learned through consequences.
B.F. Skinner’s Work:
B.F. Skinner, a key figure in operant conditioning, built upon Thorndike’s ideas, using the “Skinner box” to study how animals learn through reinforcement and punishment.
Positive Reinforcement
adding a desirable stimulus after a behavior to increase the likelihood of that behavior occurring again.
Negative Reinforcement
removing an unpleasant stimulus to increase the likelihood of a desired behavior occurring in the future.
What it is:
Negative reinforcement is a type of operant conditioning where a behavior is strengthened by the removal of something undesirable.
How it works:
By removing an aversive (unpleasant) stimulus, the behavior that led to the removal is more likely to be repeated.
Examples:
Taking away chores: A child learns that good behavior leads to not having to do chores, reinforcing the good behavior.
Lessening leash tension: A dog learns that walking politely leads to the removal of tension on the leash, reinforcing the polite walking.
Turning off an alarm: A person learns that wearing a seatbelt stops the annoying beeping sound, reinforcing the seatbelt behavior.
Key difference from punishment:
While both involve removing something, punishment aims to decrease a behavior, while negative reinforcement aims to increase a behavior.
Not about “good” or “bad”:
The terms “positive” and “negative” in reinforcement don’t refer to the quality of the stimulus, but rather whether something is added or removed.
Positive Punishment
adding an unpleasant or aversive stimulus to decrease the likelihood of a behavior occurring again.
Operant Conditioning:
Positive punishment is a type of operant conditioning, where behaviors are learned through their consequences.
Adding an Aversive Stimulus:
The key characteristic of positive punishment is that an unpleasant stimulus is added after the unwanted behavior.
Decreasing Behavior:
The goal of positive punishment is to reduce the frequency or likelihood of the undesirable behavior occurring in the future.
Examples:
Examples of positive punishment include:
Giving a child extra chores for misbehaving.
Receiving a speeding ticket for driving over the speed limit.
Getting scolded for talking back.
Contrast with Negative Punishment:
It’s important to distinguish positive punishment from negative punishment, which involves removing a desirable stimulus to decrease behavior.
Negative Punishment
removing a desirable stimulus to decrease the likelihood of a particular behavior occurring again.
Definition:
Negative punishment, also known as punishment by removal, is a type of operant conditioning where a desirable or pleasant stimulus is taken away after a behavior occurs, leading to a decrease in the frequency of that behavior.
Key Concept:
The core idea is that removing something good or enjoyable makes an individual less likely to engage in the behavior that led to the removal.
Examples:
Taking away a child’s favorite toy after they misbehave.
Losing screen time privileges for not completing homework.
Being grounded for breaking a rule.
Losing reward tokens for not completing a task.
Contrast with Negative Reinforcement:
It’s important to distinguish negative punishment from negative reinforcement. While both involve removing something, negative reinforcement strengthens a behavior by removing an unpleasant stimulus, whereas negative punishment weakens a behavior by removing a desirable stimulus.
Example of Negative Reinforcement:
Removing chores for the weekend when a child keeps their room clean all week.
Primary Reinforcer
a stimulus that naturally satisfies a biological need, like food or water, and does not require learning to be reinforcing.
Definition:
Primary reinforcers are stimuli that are inherently rewarding and satisfying, meaning they don’t need to be learned or associated with other stimuli to be effective.
Examples:
Common examples include food, water, warmth, and relief from pain or discomfort.
Contrast with Secondary Reinforcers:
Secondary reinforcers, on the other hand, are stimuli that gain their reinforcing power through association with primary reinforcers (e.g., money, which can be used to buy food).
Operant Conditioning:
Primary reinforcers are a key concept in operant conditioning, which involves learning through the consequences of behavior.
Biological Need:
Primary reinforcers are effective because they satisfy basic biological needs, such as hunger, thirst, or the need for rest.
Example:
In a Skinner box experiment, a rat might be given a food pellet as a primary reinforcer for pressing a lever.