Week 1-4 Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What is emotivism?

A

Emotivism is the theory that ethical and value judgements are only expressions of feeling/attitude(as opposed to objective truths)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did AJ Ayer have to say about moral disagreements?

A

They are about stating relevant facts in order to convince your opponent to adopt the same moral attitude as yours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to Ayer, value claims are _____

A

an expression of emotion, cannot be scientific/objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is error theory and from which philosopher does this idea come?

A

Error theory is an idea from J.L. Mackie that all moral claims are false

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why does Mackie believe moral facts to be strange to exist?

A

If moral facts did exist, they would provide an overriding reason to act on them, independent of context. No other facts function to provide motive to do something, thus moral facts are strange.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Spectator Theory of Knowledge and from which philosopher does this idea come?

A

If we want to learn about reality we simply need to observe it (and reflect it without regards to our desires). John Dewey.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Lepley say about the distinction of facts and values?

A

Verifiability of Value: All factual statements are translatable into valuative ones & all valuative statements are translatable into factual ones.. i.e. Facts and values are NOT distinct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the distinction between what is valued and what is valuable?

A

This idea, coming from Dewey, is that we can test the effects of valuing something to determine where what is being valued is in fact valued. That is, all things considered, what is initially valued does not interfere with our other desires (is this is best decision to be made?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consequentialism

A

The moral theory that something is morally right based on the outcome it produces (consequences>intention)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Deontology

A

The moral theory that things are morally right based on if it is done with the intention of following moral duties (intention>consequences)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Divine Command Theory

A

Something is morally right if it is what god commands us to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Euthyphro problem?

A

The issue that results from divine command theory: is something wrong merely because it is what God says so?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the distinction between instrumental and inherent value?

A

Instrumental: valuable because it is useful
Inherent: valuable in of itself (e.g. “goodness”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Everything we do is for the sake of getting pleasure or avoiding pain. Which philosopher does this idea come from?

A

Jeremy Bentham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the principle of utility?

A

An action is moral if it increases happiness, it is immoral if it decreases happiness. (also known as Utilitarianism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What problems did Mill have with Bentham’s Utilitarian philosophy?

A

Mill believes that there are higher and lower pleasures (quality>quantity). Bentham’s philosophy does not distinguish this.
-Believes intellectual pleasures are higher pleasures

17
Q

Act Utilitarianism

A

Judging an ACT based on its capacity to bring out the greatest amount of happiness

18
Q

Rule Utilitarianism

A

Judging a RULE based on its capacity to bring about greatest amount of happiness

19
Q

Is Kant’s philosophy consequential or deontological?

A

Deontological

20
Q

What is a good in itself according to Kant?

21
Q

Hypothetical Imperative

A

Determines what to do as a means to an end

22
Q

Categorical Imperative

A

Determines what to do as an end-in-itself

23
Q

What is the Humanity Principle?

A

Acting to treat humanity as an end, never merely as a means (e.g. using someone for your own gains goes against the humanity principle.)

24
Q

According to Kant, moral facts must be _____ and context is _____

A

moral facts must be UNIVERSAL and context is IRRELEVANT

25
What issues does Anscombe have with Kantian ethics?
- The idea of "legislating for oneself" is absurd (How can we meaningfully obligate ourselves?) - The idea of morality as a law comes from Christian ethics.
26
What is teleology?
The theory that everything has a purpose, and something is good if it fulfills that purpose. (e.g. a knife is good if it cuts well)
27
Eudaimonia
To live a virtuous life according to reason
28
According to Aristotle, what makes a virtuous character trait?
A character trait is virtuous if it is the middle ground between two extremes. (e.g. Courageousness is the middle ground between Rashness and Cowardliness)
29
Virtue Theory
The moral theory that emphasizes virtuous character - to be virtuous, requires wisdom and understanding - it must make you happy to act in a virtuous way
30
Sandler suggested a "Natural Goodness Approach" to virtue ethics to address some of its issues. Explain.
The Natural Goodness Approach is the idea that what is good for humans is similar to what is good for other living beings. There are traits that support our biological ends, psychological ends, and rational ends. These can be seen as virtues.
31
The Natural Goodness Approach(of virtue ethics) is not about being ___ or ____, but being ____ or ____ as a _____.
Not about being GOOD or EVIL, but being BETTER or WORSE as a human being.
32
According to Hurthouse(virtue ethics), and act is morally right if and only if ____________.
iff it is what a virtuous person would do in those circumstances.
33
What is moral pluralism?
The idea that there are several values that can be correct and that they /can/ conflict with each other. That is... two different virtuous agents can make different decisions depending on a situation and both can be moral (there is no one right answer).
34
Which moral theory is compatible with moral pluralism? Which ones are not?
Virtue theory is compatible. Kant and UT ethics not.
35
What is the Ethics of Care?
The theory from Gilligan that there /is/ moral significance in our relationships in life. We need to promote the well being of our care givers/receivers.
36
According to Baier, how can we create a moral theory that accommodates both women's and men's moral intuitions?
a moral theory that makes TRUST its central problem could speak to men's and women's moral intuitions (can accommodate both love and obligation)
37
What issues did Held have with traditional moral theories?
Traditional moral theories are impartial to our personal relationships. According to Held, relationships are morally significant and should be given priority.
38
Who are the three feminist moral philosophers discussed in this class?
Baier, Held, Gilligan
39
Why does Lepley Believe facts and values are not distinct ?
1) Factual sentences can be misleading. We cannot understand them without context. (ex. "water is h20") 2) Factual statements are not independent of our interests (ex. "the ball is in the hole") 3) Both facts an values express relationships between events