Week 9-11 Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

Popper believes that science uses:

a) induction
b) deduction

A

Deduction (contrary to what many other scientists believed at the time)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Popper’s idea of falsification?

A

The idea that scientist never confirms anything, it simply rejects alternatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to Popper, for something to be scientific it must be _____

A

falsifiable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a crucial experiment?

A

a decisive experiment that determine which of competing theories is better, where one theory proves it is incorrect in its predictions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is verificationism?

A

The idea that a scientific theory is only meaningful if it can be verified (as opposed to falsification)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Duhem’s concern with the traditional view of theory verification?

A

The traditional view holds that we must “leave the theory out of the laboratory” when testing it, but Duhem states that this is not possible (in physics). When we test a theory, we implicitly make assumptions about the accuracy of a bunch of theories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Theory Ladeness of Observation

A

The inability to separate theory from observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Confirmation Holism

A

The view that science is a system that must be taken as a whole. It cannot function except when the parts that are most remote from it are called into play.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the two main points of Nancy Cartwright’s philosophy of science?

A

1) The laws of physics are not literally true. They only hold within specific, ideal conditions.
2) A false prediction only means that there is a problem with the system as a whole. It does not tell us where that problem is and so we are justified in keeping a theory if it proves to have false predictions so long as we make some other change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an Unexperimental Hypothesis?

A

Theories in science that cannot be contradicted by experiment because they are only definitions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to Duhem, how can we decide what scientific theories to keep and what conventions to use?

A

Use good sense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Underdetermination

A

When two theories both account for the same evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are background assumptions?

A

Ideas that link states of affairs to hypotheses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Epistemic Pluralism

A

There are multiple ways of knowing and describing the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Monoism

A

There is only one correct way of knowing and describing the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is incommensurability?

A

When two seemingly different theories don’t agree on common measures of things (ex. what counts as biological factors)

17
Q

What does the Harm Principle state (Mill)?

A

“The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.”

18
Q

What does the offense principle state?

A

The conduct of others may be curtailed if it causes offense to society.

19
Q

What is Mill’s view on free speech?

A

We should be given an “open arena”, through the combat of ideas, truth will eventually emerge.

20
Q

According to Mill, what should we do about those who say obnoxious things/act obnoxiously(as opposed to being “open minded”)?

A

We can

  • ignore them/choose the company of others
  • teach them
  • warn others of them
21
Q

According to Mill, we are only warranted of our beliefs when:

A

we allow for the conditions that could prove it wrong. We must be open to criticism of our beliefs.

22
Q

Why does Kitcher disagree with Mill?

A

Kitcher disagrees with Mill’s idea that freedom of expression should be absolute, because in the long run these freedoms can CONFLICT with other freedoms we consider more important.
(must we continually discuss discarded ideas? e.g. flat earth)

“The Millian arena where conflicting ideas battle for approval as epistemic equals and where bystanders are never hurt is a splendid ideal, but it is naïve to think this actually exists.”

23
Q

What is political asymmetry?

A

When evidence that confirms a belief leads to reversion(return) of that belief, but the negation of the belief would not lead to further eradication of it (the belief still persists).

24
Q

What is epistemic asymmetry?

A

Thinking the probability of a belief to be true is higher than evidence suggests, and the probability of a belief to be false is lower than evidence suggests

25
How can unlimited free speech harm free speech in the long run?
Having unlimited free speech can lead to the undermining of the intellectual development and acceptance of the underprivileged (some voices are heard more than others), and this might harm our long term goal of critical engagement.
26
What is the Streisand Effect?
a phenomenon where in an attempt to hide/censor a piece of information, it has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely.
27
Longino believes monism is not empirically supported. Why?
1) The things we know are only partial knowledge 2) Each approach offers partial understanding 3) The effects of causes and behaviour are represented in incommensurable ways
28
Moderate Pluralism
Pluralism can have compatible approaches to describing different aspects of an integrated overall account. Eventually, pluralism can be eliminated.
29
Reductive Pluralism
The idea that there can be a plurality of accounts, but they can all be reduced to a more fundamental account
30
Longino: While a complete model of integrated factors may be possible, we may learn more from ......
We may learn more from competing partial representations than trying to integrate all models into one account.
31
Strong Pluralism
There are multiple accounts that can be incompatible and not resolvable into a single account, but this is not a failure.
32
In what ways can we accept pluralism and still hold the objectivity of science? (Longino)
1) Recognized avenues for criticism (ex. conferences, peer review etc) 2) Shared standards (public standards to which science must be bound) 3) Community response/uptake (Beliefs of a scientific community as a whole should change over time in response to critical discussion taking place within it) 3) Equality of Intellectual Authorities (women, minorities etc)