Week 4 Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

Three Layers of Social Behavior

A

Universal

  • the human nature
  • universal values
  • commonly shared world review

Cultural
- human rely on culture i.e. extrasomatic means adaptiation for survival –> eskimo

Personal

  • individual biography and genetic predisposition form our personality
  • having the same cultural roots does not mean that one is identical in his/her behavior
  • every person is unique
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Culture at two levels

A
  1. psychological level
    - Focuses on internalized norms, attitudes, values and behaviors of individuals from a particular culture
  2. the institutional level
    - National or group culture embodied in institutions (i.e. government, education, economic institutions, & business organizations).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Commerce and government

A

are secondary, not primary institutions. They are derivative of the culture, not the progenitors of it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cross-Cultural competence is beeing?

A

is beeing SMART not beeing nice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

stereotyping

A
  • a common but oversimplified and fixed image or idea of a particular type of person or thing
  • tendency to group things together
  • often unconcious and in line with our own cultural programming
  • tend to exaggerate similarities of things with the same group and fifferences between groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why do we stereotype

A
  • cognitive economy

- in - group favorability bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cognitive Economy

A

Efficient categorization
- negates the need to re assess specific situations

Predictive ability
- assumes knowledge
of how an “other” group will act, behave, respond, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In Group Favorability Bias

A

Social identity
- a person’s sense of who they are based on their group membership

Group membership
- source of pride and self esteem, source of sense of belonging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Group identity

A

has emotional significance as a source of self-identification, self-esteem, and belonging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

competition and hostility

A

between groups results from competing for resources, and also as the result of competing identities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

pygmalion effect

A

Higher expectations (positive prejudice) lead to increased performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Golem effect

A

Lower expectations (biased, prejudice, etc.) lead to decreased performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stereotypes

A

Categorizing all members of a group as having the same characteristics

Selective and inflexible perception

Observations are subjective, judgmental

Clichés

not open for new infromation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Generalizations

A

Categorizing many members of a group as having similar characteristic tendencies

Flexible perception

Observations are neutral, objective

Tendencies

open for new informations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cultural Frameworks

A
  1. Hofstede Cultural Dimension
  2. GLOBE Studies
  3. Lewis Model
  4. Kluckhohn Strodtbeck Framework
  5. Trompenaars & Hampden Turner Cultural Dimensions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hofstede Cultural Dimensions

A

Culture’s consequences:

- Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations by Geert Hofstede 2001

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

GLOBE Studies

A

Culture, Leadership, and Organizations:

The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies by Robert J House, Paul J. Hanges, Mansour Javidan , Peter W. Dorfman, Vipin Gupta, 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Lewis Model

A

When Cultures Collide, Managing Successfully Across Cultures by Richard D. Lewis, 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Kluckhohn Strodtbeck Framework

A

Variations in Value

Orientations by Florence Kluckholn and Fred L. Strodtbeck , 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Trompenaars & Hampden Turner Cultural Dimensions :

A

Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business by FonsTrompenaars , & Charles Hampden Turner, 1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Hofstede

A

Individualism vs. Collectivism

power distance index

Masculinity vs. femininity

uncertainty avoidance index

long term orientation vs. short term orientation

indulgence vs. restraint

22
Q

GLOBE Studies

A
  1. Uncertainty avoidance
  2. Power distance
  3. In group collectivism
  4. Institutional collectivism
  5. Gender Equalitarianism
  6. Assertiveness
  7. Future Orientation
  8. Performance Orientation
  9. Human Orientation
23
Q

the world according to lews

A

linera-active

  • talsk half the time
  • does one thing at a time

multi-active

  • talkes most of the time
  • does several things at once

reactive

  • listens most of the time
  • reacts to partner’s action
24
Q

Kluckhohn Strodtbeck Framework

This framework compares cultures by answering the following six questions:

A
  1. Do people believe that their environment controls them, that they control the environment, or that they are part of nature?
  2. Do people focus on past events, on the present, or on the future implications of their actions?
  3. Are people easily controlled and not to be trusted, or can they be trusted to act freely and responsibly?
  4. Do people desire accomplishments in life, carefree lives, or spiritual and contemplative lives?
  5. Do people believe that individuals or groups are responsible for each person’s welfare?
  6. Do people prefer to conduct most activities in private or in public?
25
Identify cross-cultural risks: | Trompenaars & Hampden Turner
1. Universalism vs. Particularism (rules vs. relationships) 2. Individualism vs. Communitarianism (group vs. individual) 3. Specific vs. Diffusive (private vs. public life) 4. Neutral vs. Affective (emotive display) 5. Achievement vs. Ascription (status) 6. Past vs. Future (time orientation) 7. Internal vs. External Locus of Control (nature vs. nurture)
26
Universalism vs. Particularism (rules vs. relationships) | Example: lie for a friend or not
Universalism - Consistency - Rules and Systems - Clarity based on standards - Uniform procedures - Desire for structure - Letter of the Law Particularism - “It depends” - Pragmatic responses - Exceptions and Relationship - Flexibility based on relationships - Comfortable with ambiguity - Spirit of the Law (within the context of the relationship)
27
Pros and Cons Univeralism
Pros - Equality - rule of law - tolerance - consistency - reliability - clarity Cons: - Bureaucracy - Impersonality - Rigidity - Too many rules and regulations
28
Pros and Cons Particularism
Pros - Flexibility - Improvisation - Interpersonality - Responsiveness - Outcome oriented pragmatism Cons: - Discrimination - Favoritism - Corruption - Unreliability - Chaos
29
Individualism vs. Communitarianism | example: I only look at my self, or I think about the others
``` Individualism - “I” culture - Focus on the individual - Democratic decision making - Skill based selection - Pay for performance - Individual mandate - One representative ``` Communitarianism - “We” culture - Focus on the group - Consensus-based decision making - Culture-based selection - Team rewards - Group mandate - Delegation
30
Pros and Cons: Individualism
Pros - Competition - Self reliance - Personal growth and fulfillment - Independence - Autonomy - Freedom - Divergent thinking Cons - Greed - Waste - Egotism - Mercilessness - Victim blaming - Lack of social cohesion, social capital or common purpose
31
Pros and Cons: Communitarianism
Pros - Cooperation - Togetherness - Teamwork - Solidarity - Social concern - Public service - Societal legacy Cons - Mediocrity - Slow progress - Lack of individual initiative
32
Affective vs. Neutral | example: i show my emotions or i act like i'm happy even if i'm sad
Affective - Emotional - Humorous - Expressive - Verbally communicative - Close body space - Tactile Neutral - Detached - Serious - Controlled - Non-verbal communication - Larger body-space - Non tactile
33
Pros and Cons: Affective
Pros - Warm - Engaged - Spontaneous - Expressive Cons - Hysterical - Over reacting - Unmanageable - Emotionally unstable
34
Pros and Cons: Neutral
Pros - cold - detached - evasive Cons - balanced - reasonable - in-control - emotionally stable
35
Specific vs. Diffuse | example: my boss is only my boss at the company or i won't ignore my boss outside the work
Specific (Analytic, Differentiated) - Text / Task - Easy Contact - Open, direct communication - Analyzing, segmenting - Hard selling - Shareholders Diffuse (Holistic, Integrated) - Context, Relationship - Slower personal involvement - Polite, implicit communication - Connecting issues - Client relationship - Stakeholders
36
Pros and Cons: Specific
Pros - easy contact - task oriented cons - too direct - blunt
37
Pros and Cons: Diffuse
Pros - Personally involved - committed Cons - Evasive - indirect
38
Achievement vs. Ascription Example: respect is give based on what i do or what i am capable of doing vs. respect is given based on who i am or who my parents were
Achievement - What you do - Achievement - Performance Ascription - Who you are - Family background - Age - Gender - Education - Position
39
Pros and Cons: Achievement
Pros - top performing individuals - pushing or next performance - competition Cons - past performance doesn't count - no time for learning
40
Pros and Cons: Ascription
Pros - predictability - stability Cons - status quo unchallenged - steep hierarchy - rigidity - nepotism
41
Sequential vs. Synchronous Time | example: time is exact vs. time is relative
Sequential - Time is Linear - One activity at a time - Situations are subject to planning - Break time into separate blocks - Universalistic time Synchronous - Time is Cyclical - Parallel activities - More paths to reach the goal - Time horizons can blend together - Subjective time
42
Time Orientation
1. Past orientation : respect for ancestors, traditions, collective historical experiences 2. Present orientation : day by day experience directs people’s life, focus on doing and action 3. Future orientation : activities are directed toward future prospects, focus on planning
43
Pros & Cons: Sequential Time
Pros - efficient - punctual - predictable - reliable Cons - rigid - stressed about time - inflexible
44
Pros & Cons: Synchronous Time
Pros - Effective - Flexible - Good improvisation Cons - inefficient - unpunctual - unpredictable - unreliable
45
Inner vs. Outer Locus of Control | example: luck is not an important part of life vs. many things turn out to be a matter of good or bad fortune
Internal - Internal “push” - Focus on self and in control - Discomfort with being “out of control” - Dominance and aggressiveness - Preventative maintenance - Planning and control - “Stick to the plan” External - External “pull” - Focus on others and anticipate - Comfortable with ambiguity - Respond to the environment - Trouble shooting - Options and scenarios - “Go with the flow”
46
Pros & Cons: Internal Locus of Control
Pros - go-getter - movtivated - dirve - ambition Cons - aggressive - not invented here syndrome"
47
Pros & Cons: External Locus of Control
Pros - harmonious - goes with the flow Cons - no ambition - unmotivated - overreliance on "fate" or "luck"
48
Social behavior is based on three layers
- universal - cultural - personal
49
Culture unfolds on two levels
- psychological level | - institutional level
50
Stereotypes can be helpful in making
generalization but beware that they don’t interfere with communication and understanding
51
Cultural dimension models help us
to identify, measure, and reconcile cultural differences